{"title":"基于YOLOv8模型的机器学习和深度学习算法在膝关节关节炎检测中的比较分析。","authors":"Ilkay Cinar","doi":"10.1177/08953996241308770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Knee arthritis is a prevalent joint condition that affects many people worldwide. Early detection and appropriate treatment are essential to slow the disease's progression and enhance patients' quality of life. In this study, various machine learning and deep learning algorithms were used to detect knee arthritis. The machine learning models included k-NN, SVM, and GBM, while DenseNet, EfficientNet, and InceptionV3 were used as deep learning models. Additionally, YOLOv8 classification models (YOLOv8n-cls, YOLOv8s-cls, YOLOv8m-cls, YOLOv8l-cls, and YOLOv8x-cls) were employed. The \"Annotated Dataset for Knee Arthritis Detection\" with five classes (Normal, Doubtful, Mild, Moderate, Severe) and 1650 images were divided into 80% training, 10% validation, and 10% testing using the Hold-Out method. YOLOv8 models outperformed both machine learning and deep learning algorithms. k-NN, SVM, and GBM achieved success rates of 63.61%, 64.14%, and 67.36%, respectively. Among deep learning models, DenseNet, EfficientNet, and InceptionV3 achieved 62.35%, 70.59%, and 79.41%. The highest success was seen in the YOLOv8x-cls model at 86.96%, followed by YOLOv8l-cls at 86.79%, YOLOv8m-cls at 83.65%, YOLOv8s-cls at 80.37%, and YOLOv8n-cls at 77.91%.</p>","PeriodicalId":49948,"journal":{"name":"Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology","volume":" ","pages":"8953996241308770"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of machine learning and deep learning algorithms for knee arthritis detection using YOLOv8 models.\",\"authors\":\"Ilkay Cinar\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08953996241308770\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Knee arthritis is a prevalent joint condition that affects many people worldwide. Early detection and appropriate treatment are essential to slow the disease's progression and enhance patients' quality of life. In this study, various machine learning and deep learning algorithms were used to detect knee arthritis. The machine learning models included k-NN, SVM, and GBM, while DenseNet, EfficientNet, and InceptionV3 were used as deep learning models. Additionally, YOLOv8 classification models (YOLOv8n-cls, YOLOv8s-cls, YOLOv8m-cls, YOLOv8l-cls, and YOLOv8x-cls) were employed. The \\\"Annotated Dataset for Knee Arthritis Detection\\\" with five classes (Normal, Doubtful, Mild, Moderate, Severe) and 1650 images were divided into 80% training, 10% validation, and 10% testing using the Hold-Out method. YOLOv8 models outperformed both machine learning and deep learning algorithms. k-NN, SVM, and GBM achieved success rates of 63.61%, 64.14%, and 67.36%, respectively. Among deep learning models, DenseNet, EfficientNet, and InceptionV3 achieved 62.35%, 70.59%, and 79.41%. The highest success was seen in the YOLOv8x-cls model at 86.96%, followed by YOLOv8l-cls at 86.79%, YOLOv8m-cls at 83.65%, YOLOv8s-cls at 80.37%, and YOLOv8n-cls at 77.91%.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49948,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8953996241308770\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08953996241308770\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08953996241308770","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative analysis of machine learning and deep learning algorithms for knee arthritis detection using YOLOv8 models.
Knee arthritis is a prevalent joint condition that affects many people worldwide. Early detection and appropriate treatment are essential to slow the disease's progression and enhance patients' quality of life. In this study, various machine learning and deep learning algorithms were used to detect knee arthritis. The machine learning models included k-NN, SVM, and GBM, while DenseNet, EfficientNet, and InceptionV3 were used as deep learning models. Additionally, YOLOv8 classification models (YOLOv8n-cls, YOLOv8s-cls, YOLOv8m-cls, YOLOv8l-cls, and YOLOv8x-cls) were employed. The "Annotated Dataset for Knee Arthritis Detection" with five classes (Normal, Doubtful, Mild, Moderate, Severe) and 1650 images were divided into 80% training, 10% validation, and 10% testing using the Hold-Out method. YOLOv8 models outperformed both machine learning and deep learning algorithms. k-NN, SVM, and GBM achieved success rates of 63.61%, 64.14%, and 67.36%, respectively. Among deep learning models, DenseNet, EfficientNet, and InceptionV3 achieved 62.35%, 70.59%, and 79.41%. The highest success was seen in the YOLOv8x-cls model at 86.96%, followed by YOLOv8l-cls at 86.79%, YOLOv8m-cls at 83.65%, YOLOv8s-cls at 80.37%, and YOLOv8n-cls at 77.91%.
期刊介绍:
Research areas within the scope of the journal include:
Interaction of x-rays with matter: x-ray phenomena, biological effects of radiation, radiation safety and optical constants
X-ray sources: x-rays from synchrotrons, x-ray lasers, plasmas, and other sources, conventional or unconventional
Optical elements: grazing incidence optics, multilayer mirrors, zone plates, gratings, other diffraction optics
Optical instruments: interferometers, spectrometers, microscopes, telescopes, microprobes