Joshua Roshal MD , Alec Max Bernard MD , Tejas Sathe MD , Jed Calata MD
{"title":"便士明智,英镑愚蠢:航空工业公司化和学术手术令人不安的相似之处","authors":"Joshua Roshal MD , Alec Max Bernard MD , Tejas Sathe MD , Jed Calata MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The passengers of Lion Air Flight 610 and Ethiopian Airways Flight 302 paid the ultimate price for decades of prioritizing profits over technical expertise at The Boeing Company. Now, American surgical education is showing similar signs of turbulence. While surgical training has long been known for its rigor and potency, corporatized medicine is compromising what was once a proud standard. The American Board of Surgery has recently overhauled graduation requirements from surgical residency, hoping to increase the trustworthiness of new surgeons to the public. However, we are at a tipping point where the decisions being made in hospitals mirror those that led to aviation failures. This is more than a professional issue; it's a public one. How we train the next generation of surgeons will determine the quality-of-care millions of people receive. This story is about systemic cracks—and how we can begin to repair them. Boeing's trajectory shifted from an engineering-first culture to a profit-driven one, and this shift has compromised safety and performance. Similarly, surgical education is undergoing a transformation driven by financial pressures. Hospitals are increasingly prioritizing revenue generation over the quality of training. The consequences? A lack of operative autonomy for residents, fewer opportunities for hands-on learning, and ultimately, a generation of surgeons less prepared for independent practice. Now surgeons are forced to meet productivity and “relative-value unit” demands that leave little time to train the next generation. While the field of surgery has initiated changes in surgical education from within, these efforts are not enough. We need funding and prioritization of educational endeavors. We aim to engage readers in this discussion because improving the quality of the next generation of surgeons is crucial to the quality of care they will receive. It's a conversation we need to have now—before the consequences become as visible as they have in the aviation industry.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Education","volume":"82 5","pages":"Article 103468"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Penny Wise, Pound Foolish: The Troubling Parallels of Corporatization in the Aviation Industry and Academic Surgery\",\"authors\":\"Joshua Roshal MD , Alec Max Bernard MD , Tejas Sathe MD , Jed Calata MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103468\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The passengers of Lion Air Flight 610 and Ethiopian Airways Flight 302 paid the ultimate price for decades of prioritizing profits over technical expertise at The Boeing Company. Now, American surgical education is showing similar signs of turbulence. While surgical training has long been known for its rigor and potency, corporatized medicine is compromising what was once a proud standard. The American Board of Surgery has recently overhauled graduation requirements from surgical residency, hoping to increase the trustworthiness of new surgeons to the public. However, we are at a tipping point where the decisions being made in hospitals mirror those that led to aviation failures. This is more than a professional issue; it's a public one. How we train the next generation of surgeons will determine the quality-of-care millions of people receive. This story is about systemic cracks—and how we can begin to repair them. Boeing's trajectory shifted from an engineering-first culture to a profit-driven one, and this shift has compromised safety and performance. Similarly, surgical education is undergoing a transformation driven by financial pressures. Hospitals are increasingly prioritizing revenue generation over the quality of training. The consequences? A lack of operative autonomy for residents, fewer opportunities for hands-on learning, and ultimately, a generation of surgeons less prepared for independent practice. Now surgeons are forced to meet productivity and “relative-value unit” demands that leave little time to train the next generation. While the field of surgery has initiated changes in surgical education from within, these efforts are not enough. We need funding and prioritization of educational endeavors. We aim to engage readers in this discussion because improving the quality of the next generation of surgeons is crucial to the quality of care they will receive. It's a conversation we need to have now—before the consequences become as visible as they have in the aviation industry.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Education\",\"volume\":\"82 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 103468\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720425000492\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720425000492","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
狮航610航班和埃塞俄比亚航空302航班的乘客为波音公司几十年来将利润置于技术专长之上的做法付出了最终代价。现在,美国的外科教育也出现了类似的动荡迹象。虽然外科训练长期以来以其严格和效力而闻名,但公司化的医疗正在损害曾经引以为豪的标准。美国外科委员会(American Board of Surgery)最近对外科住院医师的毕业要求进行了全面改革,希望提高公众对新外科医生的信任度。然而,我们正处于一个临界点,医院正在做出的决定反映了那些导致航空失败的决定。这不仅仅是一个专业问题;它是公共的。我们如何培训下一代外科医生将决定数百万人获得的医疗质量。这个故事是关于系统性的裂缝,以及我们如何开始修复它们。波音公司的发展轨迹从“工程第一”的文化转变为“利润驱动”的文化,这种转变损害了安全性和性能。同样,在财政压力的推动下,外科教育也在经历转型。医院越来越重视创收,而不是培训质量。后果呢?住院医生缺乏手术自主权,动手学习的机会减少,最终,一代外科医生对独立执业的准备不足。现在,外科医生被迫满足生产力和“相对价值单位”的要求,几乎没有时间培训下一代。虽然外科领域已经从内部开始了外科教育的变革,但这些努力还不够。我们需要资金和教育事业的优先次序。我们的目标是让读者参与到这个讨论中来,因为提高下一代外科医生的质量对他们将获得的护理质量至关重要。这是我们现在需要进行的对话——在后果变得像航空业那样明显之前。
Penny Wise, Pound Foolish: The Troubling Parallels of Corporatization in the Aviation Industry and Academic Surgery
The passengers of Lion Air Flight 610 and Ethiopian Airways Flight 302 paid the ultimate price for decades of prioritizing profits over technical expertise at The Boeing Company. Now, American surgical education is showing similar signs of turbulence. While surgical training has long been known for its rigor and potency, corporatized medicine is compromising what was once a proud standard. The American Board of Surgery has recently overhauled graduation requirements from surgical residency, hoping to increase the trustworthiness of new surgeons to the public. However, we are at a tipping point where the decisions being made in hospitals mirror those that led to aviation failures. This is more than a professional issue; it's a public one. How we train the next generation of surgeons will determine the quality-of-care millions of people receive. This story is about systemic cracks—and how we can begin to repair them. Boeing's trajectory shifted from an engineering-first culture to a profit-driven one, and this shift has compromised safety and performance. Similarly, surgical education is undergoing a transformation driven by financial pressures. Hospitals are increasingly prioritizing revenue generation over the quality of training. The consequences? A lack of operative autonomy for residents, fewer opportunities for hands-on learning, and ultimately, a generation of surgeons less prepared for independent practice. Now surgeons are forced to meet productivity and “relative-value unit” demands that leave little time to train the next generation. While the field of surgery has initiated changes in surgical education from within, these efforts are not enough. We need funding and prioritization of educational endeavors. We aim to engage readers in this discussion because improving the quality of the next generation of surgeons is crucial to the quality of care they will receive. It's a conversation we need to have now—before the consequences become as visible as they have in the aviation industry.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Surgical Education (JSE) is dedicated to advancing the field of surgical education through original research. The journal publishes research articles in all surgical disciplines on topics relative to the education of surgical students, residents, and fellows, as well as practicing surgeons. Our readers look to JSE for timely, innovative research findings from the international surgical education community. As the official journal of the Association of Program Directors in Surgery (APDS), JSE publishes the proceedings of the annual APDS meeting held during Surgery Education Week.