在四个国家的老年人中,潜在分类分析确定了四种不同的患者处方类型。

IF 4.9 3区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Innovation in Aging Pub Date : 2025-01-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/geroni/igaf002
Kristie Rebecca Weir, Vincent D Marshall, Sarah E Vordenberg
{"title":"在四个国家的老年人中,潜在分类分析确定了四种不同的患者处方类型。","authors":"Kristie Rebecca Weir, Vincent D Marshall, Sarah E Vordenberg","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igaf002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Polypharmacy, the concurrent use of multiple medicines, is a growing concern among older adults and those with chronic conditions. Deprescribing through dose reduction or discontinuing selected medicines is a strategy for reducing medicine-related harm. The Patient Deprescribing Typology was developed using qualitative methods to describe the varying factors that are important to older adults when they consider deprescribing. The objective of this study was to use quantitative methods to define distinct classes of older adults via the Patient Deprescribing Typology.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This study used a cross-sectional experimental design in which data was collected via an online survey from participants 65 years and older in Australia, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States. A latent class analysis was performed using the 4-item Patient Deprescribing Typology that collected data about the beliefs about the importance of medicines, how older adults learn about medicines, medicine decision-making preferences, and attitudes towards stopping medicines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Older adults (<i>n</i> = 2,250) were a median of 70 years and 2-thirds reported that their highest level of education was an associate's degree or trade school or less. We identified 4 distinct Patient Deprescribing Typology classes: Class 1 \"Trusts their doctor\" (41.6%), Class 2 \"Makes own decisions\" (30.2%), Class 3 \"Avoids deprescribing\" (15.5%), and Class 4 'Medicines not important' (12.7%).</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Older adults report diverse perspectives about deprescribing, emphasizing the need for tailored communication strategies in clinical settings. Additional research is needed to examine older adults' preferences in real-world contexts to refine and improve deprescribing interventions.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>NCT04676282.</p>","PeriodicalId":13596,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Aging","volume":"9 2","pages":"igaf002"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11851471/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Latent Class Analysis Identifies Four Distinct Patient Deprescribing Typologies Among Older Adults in Four Countries.\",\"authors\":\"Kristie Rebecca Weir, Vincent D Marshall, Sarah E Vordenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/geroni/igaf002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Polypharmacy, the concurrent use of multiple medicines, is a growing concern among older adults and those with chronic conditions. Deprescribing through dose reduction or discontinuing selected medicines is a strategy for reducing medicine-related harm. The Patient Deprescribing Typology was developed using qualitative methods to describe the varying factors that are important to older adults when they consider deprescribing. The objective of this study was to use quantitative methods to define distinct classes of older adults via the Patient Deprescribing Typology.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This study used a cross-sectional experimental design in which data was collected via an online survey from participants 65 years and older in Australia, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States. A latent class analysis was performed using the 4-item Patient Deprescribing Typology that collected data about the beliefs about the importance of medicines, how older adults learn about medicines, medicine decision-making preferences, and attitudes towards stopping medicines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Older adults (<i>n</i> = 2,250) were a median of 70 years and 2-thirds reported that their highest level of education was an associate's degree or trade school or less. We identified 4 distinct Patient Deprescribing Typology classes: Class 1 \\\"Trusts their doctor\\\" (41.6%), Class 2 \\\"Makes own decisions\\\" (30.2%), Class 3 \\\"Avoids deprescribing\\\" (15.5%), and Class 4 'Medicines not important' (12.7%).</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Older adults report diverse perspectives about deprescribing, emphasizing the need for tailored communication strategies in clinical settings. Additional research is needed to examine older adults' preferences in real-world contexts to refine and improve deprescribing interventions.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>NCT04676282.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovation in Aging\",\"volume\":\"9 2\",\"pages\":\"igaf002\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11851471/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovation in Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf002\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:多重用药,即同时使用多种药物,在老年人和慢性病患者中日益受到关注。通过减少剂量或停药来减少处方是减少药物相关危害的一种策略。患者处方解除类型学是采用定性方法来描述老年人考虑处方解除时重要的各种因素。本研究的目的是使用定量方法通过患者处方类型学来定义不同类别的老年人。研究设计和方法:本研究采用横断面实验设计,通过在线调查从澳大利亚、荷兰、英国和美国的65岁及以上的参与者中收集数据。使用4项患者处方解除类型学进行潜在类分析,收集有关药物重要性的信念、老年人如何了解药物、药物决策偏好和对停药的态度的数据。结果:老年人(n = 2250)的中位数为70岁,三分之二的人报告说他们的最高教育水平是副学士学位或职业学校或更低。我们确定了4种不同的患者开处方类型:第1类“信任医生”(41.6%),第2类“自己做决定”(30.2%),第3类“避免开处方”(15.5%),第4类“药物不重要”(12.7%)。讨论和启示:老年人报告了关于处方的不同观点,强调了在临床环境中定制沟通策略的必要性。需要进一步的研究来检查老年人在现实环境中的偏好,以完善和改进处方干预措施。临床试验注册:NCT04676282。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Latent Class Analysis Identifies Four Distinct Patient Deprescribing Typologies Among Older Adults in Four Countries.

Background and objectives: Polypharmacy, the concurrent use of multiple medicines, is a growing concern among older adults and those with chronic conditions. Deprescribing through dose reduction or discontinuing selected medicines is a strategy for reducing medicine-related harm. The Patient Deprescribing Typology was developed using qualitative methods to describe the varying factors that are important to older adults when they consider deprescribing. The objective of this study was to use quantitative methods to define distinct classes of older adults via the Patient Deprescribing Typology.

Research design and methods: This study used a cross-sectional experimental design in which data was collected via an online survey from participants 65 years and older in Australia, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States. A latent class analysis was performed using the 4-item Patient Deprescribing Typology that collected data about the beliefs about the importance of medicines, how older adults learn about medicines, medicine decision-making preferences, and attitudes towards stopping medicines.

Results: Older adults (n = 2,250) were a median of 70 years and 2-thirds reported that their highest level of education was an associate's degree or trade school or less. We identified 4 distinct Patient Deprescribing Typology classes: Class 1 "Trusts their doctor" (41.6%), Class 2 "Makes own decisions" (30.2%), Class 3 "Avoids deprescribing" (15.5%), and Class 4 'Medicines not important' (12.7%).

Discussion and implications: Older adults report diverse perspectives about deprescribing, emphasizing the need for tailored communication strategies in clinical settings. Additional research is needed to examine older adults' preferences in real-world contexts to refine and improve deprescribing interventions.

Clinical trial registration: NCT04676282.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Innovation in Aging
Innovation in Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Innovation in Aging, an interdisciplinary Open Access journal of the Gerontological Society of America (GSA), is dedicated to publishing innovative, conceptually robust, and methodologically rigorous research focused on aging and the life course. The journal aims to present studies with the potential to significantly enhance the health, functionality, and overall well-being of older adults by translating scientific insights into practical applications. Research published in the journal spans a variety of settings, including community, clinical, and laboratory contexts, with a clear emphasis on issues that are directly pertinent to aging and the dynamics of life over time. The content of the journal mirrors the diverse research interests of GSA members and encompasses a range of study types. These include the validation of new conceptual or theoretical models, assessments of factors impacting the health and well-being of older adults, evaluations of interventions and policies, the implementation of groundbreaking research methodologies, interdisciplinary research that adapts concepts and methods from other fields to aging studies, and the use of modeling and simulations to understand factors and processes influencing aging outcomes. The journal welcomes contributions from scholars across various disciplines, such as technology, engineering, architecture, economics, business, law, political science, public policy, education, public health, social and psychological sciences, biomedical and health sciences, and the humanities and arts, reflecting a holistic approach to advancing knowledge in gerontology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信