获得肯定:针对使用兴奋剂的性少数男性暴露前预防使用的动机增强干预的先导顺序多任务随机试验。

IF 3.1 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY
Leah Davis Ewart, Michaela E Larson, Delaram Ghanooni, Rachel Verhagen, Jennifer Manuel, Kathryn McCollister, Erminia Fardone, Britt DeVries, Samantha Dilworth, Makayla Blackstock, Susanne Doblecki-Lewis, Inbal Nahum-Shani, Christian Grov, Adam W Carrico
{"title":"获得肯定:针对使用兴奋剂的性少数男性暴露前预防使用的动机增强干预的先导顺序多任务随机试验。","authors":"Leah Davis Ewart, Michaela E Larson, Delaram Ghanooni, Rachel Verhagen, Jennifer Manuel, Kathryn McCollister, Erminia Fardone, Britt DeVries, Samantha Dilworth, Makayla Blackstock, Susanne Doblecki-Lewis, Inbal Nahum-Shani, Christian Grov, Adam W Carrico","doi":"10.1037/hea0001489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This pilot sequential multiple assignment randomized trial estimated the feasibility, acceptability, and scalability of telehealth motivational enhancement interventions for optimizing HIV prevention efforts in sexual minority men (SMM) who use stimulants.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Seventy SMM who use stimulants with nonreactive HIV results that were not taking preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) were randomized to: (a) a two-session motivational interviewing (MI) intervention focusing on PrEP use and concomitant risk behaviors; or (b) a contingency management (CM) intervention with financial incentives for PrEP clinical evaluation ($50) and filling a PrEP prescription ($50). After 3 months, participants who reported they had not filled a prescription for PrEP were randomized a second time to: (a) switch to a second-stage intervention (i.e., MI + CM); or (b) continue with assessments only.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a robust engagement in the interventions, which participants described as flexible and nonjudgmental. Participants reported using CM incentives to meet basic needs and indicated that MI sessions improved their understanding of PrEP. The estimated cost of intervention delivery per participant was $404 for MI, $236 for CM, and $475 for MI + CM. Across both randomizations, participants who received CM only were most likely to provide verified evidence of PrEP use over 6 months, and there were potential benefits for reducing concomitant risk behaviors in nonresponders receiving MI + CM. Prior PrEP use and increases in PrEP intentions were significantly associated with verified PrEP use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although more definitive trials are needed to examine effectiveness, telehealth motivational enhancement interventions are promising, scalable approaches for optimizing HIV prevention among SMM who use stimulants. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55066,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology","volume":"44 3","pages":"310-320"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Getting to yes: Pilot sequential multiple assignment randomized trial of motivational enhancement interventions targeting preexposure prophylaxis use in sexual minority men who use stimulants.\",\"authors\":\"Leah Davis Ewart, Michaela E Larson, Delaram Ghanooni, Rachel Verhagen, Jennifer Manuel, Kathryn McCollister, Erminia Fardone, Britt DeVries, Samantha Dilworth, Makayla Blackstock, Susanne Doblecki-Lewis, Inbal Nahum-Shani, Christian Grov, Adam W Carrico\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/hea0001489\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This pilot sequential multiple assignment randomized trial estimated the feasibility, acceptability, and scalability of telehealth motivational enhancement interventions for optimizing HIV prevention efforts in sexual minority men (SMM) who use stimulants.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Seventy SMM who use stimulants with nonreactive HIV results that were not taking preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) were randomized to: (a) a two-session motivational interviewing (MI) intervention focusing on PrEP use and concomitant risk behaviors; or (b) a contingency management (CM) intervention with financial incentives for PrEP clinical evaluation ($50) and filling a PrEP prescription ($50). After 3 months, participants who reported they had not filled a prescription for PrEP were randomized a second time to: (a) switch to a second-stage intervention (i.e., MI + CM); or (b) continue with assessments only.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a robust engagement in the interventions, which participants described as flexible and nonjudgmental. Participants reported using CM incentives to meet basic needs and indicated that MI sessions improved their understanding of PrEP. The estimated cost of intervention delivery per participant was $404 for MI, $236 for CM, and $475 for MI + CM. Across both randomizations, participants who received CM only were most likely to provide verified evidence of PrEP use over 6 months, and there were potential benefits for reducing concomitant risk behaviors in nonresponders receiving MI + CM. Prior PrEP use and increases in PrEP intentions were significantly associated with verified PrEP use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although more definitive trials are needed to examine effectiveness, telehealth motivational enhancement interventions are promising, scalable approaches for optimizing HIV prevention among SMM who use stimulants. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Psychology\",\"volume\":\"44 3\",\"pages\":\"310-320\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0001489\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0001489","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本试点顺序多任务随机试验评估远程医疗动机增强干预的可行性、可接受性和可扩展性,以优化使用兴奋剂的性少数男性(SMM)的艾滋病毒预防工作。方法:70例未采取暴露前预防(PrEP)的使用兴奋剂且HIV检测结果无反应的SMM随机分为:(a)两次动机访谈(MI)干预,重点关注PrEP的使用和伴随的风险行为;或(b)应急管理(CM)干预,为PrEP临床评估(50美元)和开具PrEP处方(50美元)提供财政激励。3个月后,报告未服用PrEP处方的参与者第二次随机分配:(a)切换到第二阶段干预(即MI + CM);或(b)继续只进行摊款。结果:在干预中有一个强有力的参与,参与者描述为灵活和非判断。参与者报告使用CM激励来满足基本需求,并表示MI会议提高了他们对PrEP的理解。MI每位参与者的干预费用估计为404美元,CM为236美元,MI + CM为475美元。在两种随机分组中,仅接受CM的参与者最有可能提供超过6个月的PrEP使用的验证证据,并且在接受MI + CM的无反应者中减少伴随的风险行为有潜在的益处。既往PrEP使用和PrEP意图的增加与证实的PrEP使用显著相关。结论:虽然需要更明确的试验来检验有效性,但远程医疗动机增强干预是有希望的,可扩展的方法,可以优化使用兴奋剂的SMM中艾滋病毒的预防。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Getting to yes: Pilot sequential multiple assignment randomized trial of motivational enhancement interventions targeting preexposure prophylaxis use in sexual minority men who use stimulants.

Objective: This pilot sequential multiple assignment randomized trial estimated the feasibility, acceptability, and scalability of telehealth motivational enhancement interventions for optimizing HIV prevention efforts in sexual minority men (SMM) who use stimulants.

Method: Seventy SMM who use stimulants with nonreactive HIV results that were not taking preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) were randomized to: (a) a two-session motivational interviewing (MI) intervention focusing on PrEP use and concomitant risk behaviors; or (b) a contingency management (CM) intervention with financial incentives for PrEP clinical evaluation ($50) and filling a PrEP prescription ($50). After 3 months, participants who reported they had not filled a prescription for PrEP were randomized a second time to: (a) switch to a second-stage intervention (i.e., MI + CM); or (b) continue with assessments only.

Results: There was a robust engagement in the interventions, which participants described as flexible and nonjudgmental. Participants reported using CM incentives to meet basic needs and indicated that MI sessions improved their understanding of PrEP. The estimated cost of intervention delivery per participant was $404 for MI, $236 for CM, and $475 for MI + CM. Across both randomizations, participants who received CM only were most likely to provide verified evidence of PrEP use over 6 months, and there were potential benefits for reducing concomitant risk behaviors in nonresponders receiving MI + CM. Prior PrEP use and increases in PrEP intentions were significantly associated with verified PrEP use.

Conclusion: Although more definitive trials are needed to examine effectiveness, telehealth motivational enhancement interventions are promising, scalable approaches for optimizing HIV prevention among SMM who use stimulants. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Psychology
Health Psychology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
170
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Psychology publishes articles on psychological, biobehavioral, social, and environmental factors in physical health and medical illness, and other issues in health psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信