单侧黄斑营养不良-一个病例系列。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Documenta Ophthalmologica Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1007/s10633-025-10008-3
Dhanashree Ratra, Abhishek Karra
{"title":"单侧黄斑营养不良-一个病例系列。","authors":"Dhanashree Ratra, Abhishek Karra","doi":"10.1007/s10633-025-10008-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To report 2 cases with unilateral Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (VMD) and describe their multimodal investigations findings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two patients in their fifties who were misdiagnosed as central serous chorioretinopathy were carefully evaluated using multimodal imaging and electrooculography (EOG) investigations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both patients showed neurosensory elevation at the macula in one eye only leading to reduced vision. The optical coherence tomography showed subretinal hyperreflective material lining the undersurface of the elevated retina with thinning of the overlying photoreceptor layer. There was no choroidal thickening or pachy vessels. There was no leakage seen on fluorescein angiography nor any choroidal hyperpermeability on indocyanine green angiography. There was no choroidal neovascular membrane noted. The left eye was clinically unaffected for both. The EOG showed a reduced light peak to dark trough (LP:DT) ratio in both the eyes of these patients confirming the diagnosis of Best VMD. No change was seen in the eye condition over 2 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Best VMD can present in unilateral fashion in rare instances. EOG can be confirmatory along with genetic testing. It can be misdiagnosed as CSCR where multimodal imaging and EOG can help differentiate it as Best VMD.</p>","PeriodicalId":11207,"journal":{"name":"Documenta Ophthalmologica","volume":" ","pages":"111-116"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unilateral best vitelliform macular dystrophy- a case series.\",\"authors\":\"Dhanashree Ratra, Abhishek Karra\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10633-025-10008-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To report 2 cases with unilateral Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (VMD) and describe their multimodal investigations findings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two patients in their fifties who were misdiagnosed as central serous chorioretinopathy were carefully evaluated using multimodal imaging and electrooculography (EOG) investigations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both patients showed neurosensory elevation at the macula in one eye only leading to reduced vision. The optical coherence tomography showed subretinal hyperreflective material lining the undersurface of the elevated retina with thinning of the overlying photoreceptor layer. There was no choroidal thickening or pachy vessels. There was no leakage seen on fluorescein angiography nor any choroidal hyperpermeability on indocyanine green angiography. There was no choroidal neovascular membrane noted. The left eye was clinically unaffected for both. The EOG showed a reduced light peak to dark trough (LP:DT) ratio in both the eyes of these patients confirming the diagnosis of Best VMD. No change was seen in the eye condition over 2 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Best VMD can present in unilateral fashion in rare instances. EOG can be confirmatory along with genetic testing. It can be misdiagnosed as CSCR where multimodal imaging and EOG can help differentiate it as Best VMD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Documenta Ophthalmologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"111-116\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Documenta Ophthalmologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-025-10008-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Documenta Ophthalmologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-025-10008-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:报告2例单侧最佳黄斑营养不良(VMD),并描述其多模式检查结果。方法:对2例50多岁误诊为中枢性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变的患者进行多模态成像和眼电检查。结果:两例患者均表现为单眼黄斑神经感觉升高,导致视力下降。光学相干断层扫描显示视网膜下高反射物质衬在升高的视网膜下表面,其上的感光层变薄。未见脉络膜增厚或血管肿痛。荧光素血管造影未见渗漏,吲哚菁绿血管造影未见脉络膜高通透性。未见脉络膜新生血管膜。左眼在临床上均未受影响。EOG显示两眼的光峰暗谷比(LP:DT)降低,证实了最佳VMD的诊断。在2年多的时间里,眼睛状况没有变化。结论:在极少数情况下,最佳VMD可以单侧表现。EOG可以与基因检测一起证实。它可能被误诊为CSCR,而多模态成像和EOG可以帮助区分为最佳VMD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unilateral best vitelliform macular dystrophy- a case series.

Purpose: To report 2 cases with unilateral Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (VMD) and describe their multimodal investigations findings.

Methods: Two patients in their fifties who were misdiagnosed as central serous chorioretinopathy were carefully evaluated using multimodal imaging and electrooculography (EOG) investigations.

Results: Both patients showed neurosensory elevation at the macula in one eye only leading to reduced vision. The optical coherence tomography showed subretinal hyperreflective material lining the undersurface of the elevated retina with thinning of the overlying photoreceptor layer. There was no choroidal thickening or pachy vessels. There was no leakage seen on fluorescein angiography nor any choroidal hyperpermeability on indocyanine green angiography. There was no choroidal neovascular membrane noted. The left eye was clinically unaffected for both. The EOG showed a reduced light peak to dark trough (LP:DT) ratio in both the eyes of these patients confirming the diagnosis of Best VMD. No change was seen in the eye condition over 2 years.

Conclusions: Best VMD can present in unilateral fashion in rare instances. EOG can be confirmatory along with genetic testing. It can be misdiagnosed as CSCR where multimodal imaging and EOG can help differentiate it as Best VMD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Documenta Ophthalmologica
Documenta Ophthalmologica 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
21.40%
发文量
46
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Documenta Ophthalmologica is an official publication of the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision. The purpose of the journal is to promote the understanding and application of clinical electrophysiology of vision. Documenta Ophthalmologica will publish reviews, research articles, technical notes, brief reports and case studies which inform the readers about basic and clinical sciences related to visual electrodiagnosis and means to improve diagnosis and clinical management of patients using visual electrophysiology. Studies may involve animals or humans. In either case appropriate care must be taken to follow the Declaration of Helsinki for human subject or appropriate humane standards of animal care (e.g., the ARVO standards on Animal Care and Use).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信