在坦桑尼亚基洛萨地区销售的肉类产品中使用hrm增强DNA条形码进行物种认证

IF 1.4 3区 农林科学 Q4 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Edward John Dule, Edson Kinimi, Gaymary George Bakari, Robert Arsen Max, Charles Moses Lyimo, James Richard Mushi
{"title":"在坦桑尼亚基洛萨地区销售的肉类产品中使用hrm增强DNA条形码进行物种认证","authors":"Edward John Dule,&nbsp;Edson Kinimi,&nbsp;Gaymary George Bakari,&nbsp;Robert Arsen Max,&nbsp;Charles Moses Lyimo,&nbsp;James Richard Mushi","doi":"10.1007/s00003-024-01532-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Species substitution in meat products is a common form of food fraud that raises ethical, religious, dietary, and conservation issues. Measures to monitor meat substitution are being implemented in many parts of the world. However, information on similar efforts in Tanzania is scarce. This study aimed to assess species authenticity in kebabs sold in the Kilosa District. During 4 months (November 2023 to March 2024), 100 processed kebabs were purchased from fast food outlets across 3 wards: Dumila (<i>n</i> = 49), Kimamba (<i>n</i> = 24), and Mikumi (<i>n</i> = 27). Species authentication was conducted using High-resolution melting analysis and DNA barcoding, targeting two mitochondrial markers: cytochrome oxidase 1 (<i>COI</i>) and <i>16 S</i> rRNA. Out of 100 kebabs, 64 were misidentified. Notably, goat-based kebabs were the most substituted, with 36 out of 43 (83.7%) containing different species: cattle (30), chicken (2), impala (1), and warthog (3). Out of 40 cattle kebabs, 18 (45%) consisted of meat from different species: chicken (7), goat (8), 2 impala (2), and 1 warthog (1). Chicken kebabs had only 7 undeclared cattle species, and all 3 samples sold as mutton kebabs were substituted with cattle (2) and goat (1). The findings indicate a high prevalence of species substitution in meat products within the Kilosa District. Undeclared wildlife species might represent illegal bushmeat harvests in the conserved ecosystems. Extensive meat inspections and educational interventions are recommended to ensure the integrity of the meat market, consumer trust, and the conservation of wildlife.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":622,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety","volume":"20 1","pages":"41 - 52"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Species authentication in meat products sold in Kilosa District in Tanzania using HRM-enhanced DNA barcoding\",\"authors\":\"Edward John Dule,&nbsp;Edson Kinimi,&nbsp;Gaymary George Bakari,&nbsp;Robert Arsen Max,&nbsp;Charles Moses Lyimo,&nbsp;James Richard Mushi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00003-024-01532-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Species substitution in meat products is a common form of food fraud that raises ethical, religious, dietary, and conservation issues. Measures to monitor meat substitution are being implemented in many parts of the world. However, information on similar efforts in Tanzania is scarce. This study aimed to assess species authenticity in kebabs sold in the Kilosa District. During 4 months (November 2023 to March 2024), 100 processed kebabs were purchased from fast food outlets across 3 wards: Dumila (<i>n</i> = 49), Kimamba (<i>n</i> = 24), and Mikumi (<i>n</i> = 27). Species authentication was conducted using High-resolution melting analysis and DNA barcoding, targeting two mitochondrial markers: cytochrome oxidase 1 (<i>COI</i>) and <i>16 S</i> rRNA. Out of 100 kebabs, 64 were misidentified. Notably, goat-based kebabs were the most substituted, with 36 out of 43 (83.7%) containing different species: cattle (30), chicken (2), impala (1), and warthog (3). Out of 40 cattle kebabs, 18 (45%) consisted of meat from different species: chicken (7), goat (8), 2 impala (2), and 1 warthog (1). Chicken kebabs had only 7 undeclared cattle species, and all 3 samples sold as mutton kebabs were substituted with cattle (2) and goat (1). The findings indicate a high prevalence of species substitution in meat products within the Kilosa District. Undeclared wildlife species might represent illegal bushmeat harvests in the conserved ecosystems. Extensive meat inspections and educational interventions are recommended to ensure the integrity of the meat market, consumer trust, and the conservation of wildlife.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"41 - 52\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00003-024-01532-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00003-024-01532-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肉类产品中的物种替代是一种常见的食品欺诈形式,引发了道德,宗教,饮食和保护问题。世界许多地方正在实施监测肉类替代的措施。但是,关于坦桑尼亚类似努力的资料很少。本研究旨在评估基洛萨地区出售的烤肉串的物种真实性。在4个月内(2023年11月至2024年3月),从Dumila (n = 49)、Kimamba (n = 24)和Mikumi (n = 27) 3个区的快餐店购买了100根加工过的烤肉串。采用高分辨率熔融分析和DNA条形码技术进行物种鉴定,目标是两个线粒体标记:细胞色素氧化酶1 (COI)和16s rRNA。在100个烤肉串中,有64个被认错。值得注意的是,羊肉串被取代的最多,43个羊肉串中有36个(83.7%)含有不同的物种:牛(30)、鸡(2)、黑斑羚(1)和疣猪(3)。40个羊肉串中,18个(45%)由不同物种的肉组成。鸡(7),山羊(8),2只黑斑羚(2)和1只疣猪(1)。鸡肉串中只有7种未申报的牛,而作为羊肉串出售的3种样品都被牛(2)和山羊(1)代替。研究结果表明,Kilosa地区肉类产品中物种替代的发生率很高。未申报的野生动物物种可能代表了在受保护的生态系统中非法获取丛林肉。建议进行广泛的肉类检查和教育干预,以确保肉类市场的完整性、消费者的信任和野生动物的保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Species authentication in meat products sold in Kilosa District in Tanzania using HRM-enhanced DNA barcoding

Species substitution in meat products is a common form of food fraud that raises ethical, religious, dietary, and conservation issues. Measures to monitor meat substitution are being implemented in many parts of the world. However, information on similar efforts in Tanzania is scarce. This study aimed to assess species authenticity in kebabs sold in the Kilosa District. During 4 months (November 2023 to March 2024), 100 processed kebabs were purchased from fast food outlets across 3 wards: Dumila (n = 49), Kimamba (n = 24), and Mikumi (n = 27). Species authentication was conducted using High-resolution melting analysis and DNA barcoding, targeting two mitochondrial markers: cytochrome oxidase 1 (COI) and 16 S rRNA. Out of 100 kebabs, 64 were misidentified. Notably, goat-based kebabs were the most substituted, with 36 out of 43 (83.7%) containing different species: cattle (30), chicken (2), impala (1), and warthog (3). Out of 40 cattle kebabs, 18 (45%) consisted of meat from different species: chicken (7), goat (8), 2 impala (2), and 1 warthog (1). Chicken kebabs had only 7 undeclared cattle species, and all 3 samples sold as mutton kebabs were substituted with cattle (2) and goat (1). The findings indicate a high prevalence of species substitution in meat products within the Kilosa District. Undeclared wildlife species might represent illegal bushmeat harvests in the conserved ecosystems. Extensive meat inspections and educational interventions are recommended to ensure the integrity of the meat market, consumer trust, and the conservation of wildlife.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.20%
发文量
46
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The JCF publishes peer-reviewed original Research Articles and Opinions that are of direct importance to Food and Feed Safety. This includes Food Packaging, Consumer Products as well as Plant Protection Products, Food Microbiology, Veterinary Drugs, Animal Welfare and Genetic Engineering. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve Consumer Health Protection. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of Food and Feed Safety issues on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of Food and Feed Safety and Consumer Health Protection. Manuscripts – preferably written in English but also in German – are published as Research Articles, Reviews, Methods and Short Communications and should cover aspects including, but not limited to: · Factors influencing Food and Feed Safety · Factors influencing Consumer Health Protection · Factors influencing Consumer Behavior · Exposure science related to Risk Assessment and Risk Management · Regulatory aspects related to Food and Feed Safety, Food Packaging, Consumer Products, Plant Protection Products, Food Microbiology, Veterinary Drugs, Animal Welfare and Genetic Engineering · Analytical methods and method validation related to food control and food processing. The JCF also presents important News, as well as Announcements and Reports about administrative surveillance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信