EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ), Ana Allende, Valeria Bortolaia, Sara Bover-Cid, Wietske Dohmen, Lapo Mughini-Gras, Laurent Guillier, Lieve Maria Herman, Liesbeth Jacxsens, Maarten Nauta, Jakob Ottoson, Luisa Peixe, Fernando Perez-Rodriguez, Panagiotis Skandamis, Elisabetta Suffredini, Alessandra De Cesare, Pablo Fernandez Escamez, Romolo Nonno, Kamela Kryemadhi, Angel Ortiz-Pelaez, Avelino Alvarez-Ordóñez
{"title":"常压下1类动物副产品碱性水解方法的评价","authors":"EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ), Ana Allende, Valeria Bortolaia, Sara Bover-Cid, Wietske Dohmen, Lapo Mughini-Gras, Laurent Guillier, Lieve Maria Herman, Liesbeth Jacxsens, Maarten Nauta, Jakob Ottoson, Luisa Peixe, Fernando Perez-Rodriguez, Panagiotis Skandamis, Elisabetta Suffredini, Alessandra De Cesare, Pablo Fernandez Escamez, Romolo Nonno, Kamela Kryemadhi, Angel Ortiz-Pelaez, Avelino Alvarez-Ordóñez","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A new alternative method for the processing of entire bodies or body parts of pet animals (Category 1 animal by-products (ABPs)) was assessed. The method consists of an alkaline hydrolysis process under atmospheric pressure carried out in a batch system within a stainless-steel container at temperatures higher than 95.5°C for more than 14 h. Prions are the most resistant biological hazards potentially present in the material to be treated. The proposed method was assessed by the BIOHAZ Panel for its efficacy in achieving a reduction in prion infectivity by at least 6 log<sub>10</sub> to be considered equivalent to the processing method laid down in Point A Section 2 Chapter IV Annex IV of Commission Regulation (EU) No 142/2011. The application focusses on demonstrating the capacity of the alternative method to inactivate prions by providing evidence from two studies applying matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation time of flight (MALDI–TOF) mass spectrometry to show the absence of peptides larger than 3 kDa after the treatment. The BIOHAZ Panel considers that these studies do not provide direct or indirect experimental evidence that the quantitative reduction of prion infectivity is achieved by the alternative method. Therefore, in the absence of quantitative estimation of prion infectivity reduction, the alternative method cannot be considered equivalent to the approved alkaline hydrolysis process.</p>","PeriodicalId":11657,"journal":{"name":"EFSA Journal","volume":"23 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9272","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of an alkaline hydrolysis method under atmospheric pressure for Category 1 animal by-products\",\"authors\":\"EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ), Ana Allende, Valeria Bortolaia, Sara Bover-Cid, Wietske Dohmen, Lapo Mughini-Gras, Laurent Guillier, Lieve Maria Herman, Liesbeth Jacxsens, Maarten Nauta, Jakob Ottoson, Luisa Peixe, Fernando Perez-Rodriguez, Panagiotis Skandamis, Elisabetta Suffredini, Alessandra De Cesare, Pablo Fernandez Escamez, Romolo Nonno, Kamela Kryemadhi, Angel Ortiz-Pelaez, Avelino Alvarez-Ordóñez\",\"doi\":\"10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9272\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A new alternative method for the processing of entire bodies or body parts of pet animals (Category 1 animal by-products (ABPs)) was assessed. The method consists of an alkaline hydrolysis process under atmospheric pressure carried out in a batch system within a stainless-steel container at temperatures higher than 95.5°C for more than 14 h. Prions are the most resistant biological hazards potentially present in the material to be treated. The proposed method was assessed by the BIOHAZ Panel for its efficacy in achieving a reduction in prion infectivity by at least 6 log<sub>10</sub> to be considered equivalent to the processing method laid down in Point A Section 2 Chapter IV Annex IV of Commission Regulation (EU) No 142/2011. The application focusses on demonstrating the capacity of the alternative method to inactivate prions by providing evidence from two studies applying matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation time of flight (MALDI–TOF) mass spectrometry to show the absence of peptides larger than 3 kDa after the treatment. The BIOHAZ Panel considers that these studies do not provide direct or indirect experimental evidence that the quantitative reduction of prion infectivity is achieved by the alternative method. Therefore, in the absence of quantitative estimation of prion infectivity reduction, the alternative method cannot be considered equivalent to the approved alkaline hydrolysis process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EFSA Journal\",\"volume\":\"23 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9272\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EFSA Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9272\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EFSA Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9272","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
评估了一种处理宠物动物全身或身体部分(1类动物副产品)的新替代方法。该方法包括在不锈钢容器内的间歇式系统中,在高于95.5°C的温度下,在常压下进行碱性水解过程,时间超过14小时。朊病毒是待处理材料中可能存在的最具抗性的生物危害。BIOHAZ小组对提议的方法进行了评估,评估其将朊病毒传染性降低至少6 log10的有效性,被认为相当于委员会法规(EU) No 142/2011附件IV IV章第2节a点规定的处理方法。该申请的重点是通过提供两项研究的证据来证明替代方法灭活朊病毒的能力,这些研究应用基质辅助激光解吸/电离飞行时间(MALDI-TOF)质谱法来显示治疗后不存在大于3 kDa的肽。BIOHAZ小组认为,这些研究没有提供直接或间接的实验证据,证明替代方法可以定量降低朊病毒的传染性。因此,在缺乏对朊病毒感染性降低的定量估计的情况下,替代方法不能被认为等同于已批准的碱性水解工艺。
Evaluation of an alkaline hydrolysis method under atmospheric pressure for Category 1 animal by-products
A new alternative method for the processing of entire bodies or body parts of pet animals (Category 1 animal by-products (ABPs)) was assessed. The method consists of an alkaline hydrolysis process under atmospheric pressure carried out in a batch system within a stainless-steel container at temperatures higher than 95.5°C for more than 14 h. Prions are the most resistant biological hazards potentially present in the material to be treated. The proposed method was assessed by the BIOHAZ Panel for its efficacy in achieving a reduction in prion infectivity by at least 6 log10 to be considered equivalent to the processing method laid down in Point A Section 2 Chapter IV Annex IV of Commission Regulation (EU) No 142/2011. The application focusses on demonstrating the capacity of the alternative method to inactivate prions by providing evidence from two studies applying matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation time of flight (MALDI–TOF) mass spectrometry to show the absence of peptides larger than 3 kDa after the treatment. The BIOHAZ Panel considers that these studies do not provide direct or indirect experimental evidence that the quantitative reduction of prion infectivity is achieved by the alternative method. Therefore, in the absence of quantitative estimation of prion infectivity reduction, the alternative method cannot be considered equivalent to the approved alkaline hydrolysis process.
期刊介绍:
The EFSA Journal covers methods of risk assessment, reports on data collected, and risk assessments in the individual areas of plant health, plant protection products and their residues, genetically modified organisms, additives and products or substances used in animal feed, animal health and welfare, biological hazards including BSE/TSE, contaminants in the food chain, food contact materials, enzymes, flavourings and processing aids, food additives and nutrient sources added to food, dietetic products, nutrition and allergies.