IF 2.3 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Antonio Vita , Stefano Barlati , Roberto Cavallaro , Riccardo Cipelli , Giulio Corrivetti , Dario Delmonte , Eleonora Lusito , Elisabetta Maia , Maria Michela Marino , Giuseppe Nicolò , Paola Rocca , Silvana Galderisi
{"title":"The awareness, characterization, and burden of Cognitive Impairment Associated with Schizophrenia (CIAS) in clinical practice: Results from a nationwide survey in Italy","authors":"Antonio Vita ,&nbsp;Stefano Barlati ,&nbsp;Roberto Cavallaro ,&nbsp;Riccardo Cipelli ,&nbsp;Giulio Corrivetti ,&nbsp;Dario Delmonte ,&nbsp;Eleonora Lusito ,&nbsp;Elisabetta Maia ,&nbsp;Maria Michela Marino ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Nicolò ,&nbsp;Paola Rocca ,&nbsp;Silvana Galderisi","doi":"10.1016/j.scog.2025.100352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Cognitive Impairment (CIAS) is a core aspect of schizophrenia and one of the main obstacles to clinical and functional recovery in patients. People with CIAS have difficulties with learning and using information in real world. Despite its well-recognized role, it is not yet a diagnostic criterion in DSM-5 and ICD system. The effective management of CIAS represents a critical unmet need of schizophrenia treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>To evaluate the awareness of CIAS in the Italian landscape, we conducted a quantitative survey on psychiatrists highly specialized in schizophrenia, focused on its awareness, assessment, burden, and treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 152 participants, 139 (91.4 %) consider CIAS assessment important. The terminology most frequently used to describe CIAS is ‘cognitive impairment’. CIAS is assessed, clinically or with formal tools, in approximately 43 % of patients after stabilisation either during follow-up visits (<em>N</em> = 88, 67.7 %) or during hospital stay (<em>N</em> = 57, 43.8 %). 65 % of evaluated patients are considered affected by CIAS. Formal assessment tools (tests, questionnaires, interviews) are used in about 20 % of the centers. The Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) (<em>N</em> = 75, 72.1 %) and the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) (<em>N</em> = 62, 59.6 %) are the most frequently used tools for CIAS evaluation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The clinical characteristics of the patient, structural barriers like the lack of trained personnel or inadequate economic resources, and organizational problems influence the assessment rate. Despite this awareness, greater effort must be made to overcome the barriers, especially economic and organizational ones, which prevent the assessment and treatment of CIAS from becoming established in routine clinical care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38119,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article 100352"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215001325000095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言认知障碍(CIAS)是精神分裂症的核心问题,也是患者临床和功能康复的主要障碍之一。认知障碍患者在学习和使用现实世界的信息方面存在困难。尽管 CIAS 的作用已得到广泛认可,但它尚未成为 DSM-5 和 ICD 系统的诊断标准。为了评估意大利对 CIAS 的认识,我们对精神分裂症领域的专业精神科医生进行了一项定量调查,重点关注对 CIAS 的认识、评估、负担和治疗。描述 CIAS 最常用的术语是 "认知障碍"。约有 43% 的患者在病情稳定后的随访(88 人,67.7%)或住院期间(57 人,43.8%)通过临床或正规工具对 CIAS 进行了评估。在接受评估的患者中,有 65% 被认为受到 CIAS 的影响。约 20% 的中心使用正式的评估工具(测试、问卷、访谈)。结论:患者的临床特征、结构性障碍(如缺乏训练有素的人员或经济资源不足)以及组织问题都会影响评估率。尽管认识到了这一点,但仍需做出更大努力来克服障碍,尤其是经济和组织方面的障碍,因为这些障碍阻碍了 CIAS 的评估和治疗在常规临床护理中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The awareness, characterization, and burden of Cognitive Impairment Associated with Schizophrenia (CIAS) in clinical practice: Results from a nationwide survey in Italy

Introduction

Cognitive Impairment (CIAS) is a core aspect of schizophrenia and one of the main obstacles to clinical and functional recovery in patients. People with CIAS have difficulties with learning and using information in real world. Despite its well-recognized role, it is not yet a diagnostic criterion in DSM-5 and ICD system. The effective management of CIAS represents a critical unmet need of schizophrenia treatment.

Methods

To evaluate the awareness of CIAS in the Italian landscape, we conducted a quantitative survey on psychiatrists highly specialized in schizophrenia, focused on its awareness, assessment, burden, and treatment.

Results

Of 152 participants, 139 (91.4 %) consider CIAS assessment important. The terminology most frequently used to describe CIAS is ‘cognitive impairment’. CIAS is assessed, clinically or with formal tools, in approximately 43 % of patients after stabilisation either during follow-up visits (N = 88, 67.7 %) or during hospital stay (N = 57, 43.8 %). 65 % of evaluated patients are considered affected by CIAS. Formal assessment tools (tests, questionnaires, interviews) are used in about 20 % of the centers. The Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) (N = 75, 72.1 %) and the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) (N = 62, 59.6 %) are the most frequently used tools for CIAS evaluation.

Conclusions

The clinical characteristics of the patient, structural barriers like the lack of trained personnel or inadequate economic resources, and organizational problems influence the assessment rate. Despite this awareness, greater effort must be made to overcome the barriers, especially economic and organizational ones, which prevent the assessment and treatment of CIAS from becoming established in routine clinical care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.70%
发文量
54
审稿时长
67 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信