解离症状现象学:解离性精神分裂症患者与高、低解离性精神分裂症谱系障碍患者的比较

IF 2.3 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
V.E. de Vries , R.J.C. Huntjens , B.E. Sportel , J.J. Arends , G.H.M. Pijnenborg
{"title":"解离症状现象学:解离性精神分裂症患者与高、低解离性精神分裂症谱系障碍患者的比较","authors":"V.E. de Vries ,&nbsp;R.J.C. Huntjens ,&nbsp;B.E. Sportel ,&nbsp;J.J. Arends ,&nbsp;G.H.M. Pijnenborg","doi":"10.1016/j.scog.2025.100348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The distinction between dissociative disorders (DDs) and schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs) in different categories since DSM-III presumes a clear-cut distinction between both disorders. However, empirical studies did not reveal a clear distinction between the disorders on a symptom level. The aim of the current study was to further examine the overlap and differences in symptoms between DDs and SSDs<strong>.</strong></div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Levels and types of dissociative and psychotic symptoms were compared between 27 DD patients and 51 SSD patients using MANOVA. For a more fine-grained insight, a subgroup analysis was performed with the DD group and 12 individuals with SSD who report many dissociative experiences (SSD-H). Finally, a discriminant analysis was performed to explore if there are symptoms discriminating between the DD group and both SSD groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Results showed that the DD group experienced higher levels of each type of dissociative symptoms than the total SSD group. The symptoms self-states alters, discontinuities of time, flashbacks, voices, and depersonalization were found to best discriminate between the groups. These differences did not hold in the subgroup analysis between the DD group and SSD-H group, where only differences on the validity scales rare symptoms, attention seeking and factitious behavior were found.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>It can be stated that none of the dissociative and psychotic symptoms is specific to DDs or SSDs. Therefore it is advisable to be cautious with classifying based on the presence of (certain) symptoms. A transdiagnostic approach towards assessment and treatment, regardless of classification, is indicated.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38119,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article 100348"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phenomenology of dissociative symptoms: A comparison between individuals with dissociative disorders and high and low dissociative schizophrenia spectrum disorders\",\"authors\":\"V.E. de Vries ,&nbsp;R.J.C. Huntjens ,&nbsp;B.E. Sportel ,&nbsp;J.J. Arends ,&nbsp;G.H.M. Pijnenborg\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.scog.2025.100348\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The distinction between dissociative disorders (DDs) and schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs) in different categories since DSM-III presumes a clear-cut distinction between both disorders. However, empirical studies did not reveal a clear distinction between the disorders on a symptom level. The aim of the current study was to further examine the overlap and differences in symptoms between DDs and SSDs<strong>.</strong></div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Levels and types of dissociative and psychotic symptoms were compared between 27 DD patients and 51 SSD patients using MANOVA. For a more fine-grained insight, a subgroup analysis was performed with the DD group and 12 individuals with SSD who report many dissociative experiences (SSD-H). Finally, a discriminant analysis was performed to explore if there are symptoms discriminating between the DD group and both SSD groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Results showed that the DD group experienced higher levels of each type of dissociative symptoms than the total SSD group. The symptoms self-states alters, discontinuities of time, flashbacks, voices, and depersonalization were found to best discriminate between the groups. These differences did not hold in the subgroup analysis between the DD group and SSD-H group, where only differences on the validity scales rare symptoms, attention seeking and factitious behavior were found.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>It can be stated that none of the dissociative and psychotic symptoms is specific to DDs or SSDs. Therefore it is advisable to be cautious with classifying based on the presence of (certain) symptoms. A transdiagnostic approach towards assessment and treatment, regardless of classification, is indicated.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition\",\"volume\":\"40 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100348\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215001325000058\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215001325000058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自DSM-III以来,分离性障碍(dd)和精神分裂症谱系障碍(ssd)在不同类别中的区别假设了两种疾病之间的明确区分。然而,实证研究并没有在症状水平上揭示疾病之间的明确区别。本研究的目的是进一步检查dd和ssd之间症状的重叠和差异。方法采用方差分析方法对27例DD患者和51例SSD患者的分离症状和精神症状的水平和类型进行比较。为了获得更细致的见解,我们对DD组和12名报告有许多分离性经历(SSD- h)的SSD患者进行了亚组分析。最后,进行判别分析以探索DD组和SSD组之间是否存在区别症状。结果DD组各类型解离症状均高于总SSD组。自我状态改变、时间不连续性、闪回、声音和人格解体被发现是区分两组的最佳症状。这些差异在DD组和SSD-H组之间的亚组分析中不成立,其中仅在效度量表上发现罕见症状,注意寻求和人为行为的差异。结论游离性和精神病性症状均不为dd或ssd所特有。因此,根据(某些)症状的存在进行分类是明智的。指出了一种跨诊断的评估和治疗方法,无论分类如何。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Phenomenology of dissociative symptoms: A comparison between individuals with dissociative disorders and high and low dissociative schizophrenia spectrum disorders

Background

The distinction between dissociative disorders (DDs) and schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs) in different categories since DSM-III presumes a clear-cut distinction between both disorders. However, empirical studies did not reveal a clear distinction between the disorders on a symptom level. The aim of the current study was to further examine the overlap and differences in symptoms between DDs and SSDs.

Methods

Levels and types of dissociative and psychotic symptoms were compared between 27 DD patients and 51 SSD patients using MANOVA. For a more fine-grained insight, a subgroup analysis was performed with the DD group and 12 individuals with SSD who report many dissociative experiences (SSD-H). Finally, a discriminant analysis was performed to explore if there are symptoms discriminating between the DD group and both SSD groups.

Results

Results showed that the DD group experienced higher levels of each type of dissociative symptoms than the total SSD group. The symptoms self-states alters, discontinuities of time, flashbacks, voices, and depersonalization were found to best discriminate between the groups. These differences did not hold in the subgroup analysis between the DD group and SSD-H group, where only differences on the validity scales rare symptoms, attention seeking and factitious behavior were found.

Conclusion

It can be stated that none of the dissociative and psychotic symptoms is specific to DDs or SSDs. Therefore it is advisable to be cautious with classifying based on the presence of (certain) symptoms. A transdiagnostic approach towards assessment and treatment, regardless of classification, is indicated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.70%
发文量
54
审稿时长
67 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信