{"title":"人格障碍替代模型的稳定性:以Covid-19相关情况为例","authors":"Serge Combaluzier, Chloé Bourgoise","doi":"10.1016/j.encep.2024.11.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim and scope</h3><div>This article aims to explore the relationships between two key levels (Criteria A and B) in the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD). Specifically, it examines the articulation between the level of personality functioning (LPF) and the pathological personality dimensions (PPD) to understand their respective contributions to personality disorder (PD) diagnosis.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>We analyzed data collected through the LPFS-BR and PID-5-BF instruments from two randomized samples of non-clinical participants, gathered both before (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->124) and after (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->126) the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent lockdown. Mediation analyses were conducted to clarify how LPF and PPD interact in the assessment of PDs.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Findings indicate notable intensity differences in LPF levels (<em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.001, Cohen's d<!--> <!-->><!--> <!-->0.92), alongside high stability in both overall PD severity and PPD traits (<em>P</em> <!-->><!--> <!-->0.05). Regression analysis allowed us to examine the combined effects of Lockdown, Identity, and Detachment on PD severity through mediation modelling. Results suggest that Identity mediates the effects of both Lockdown and Detachment, with Detachment also having a direct impact.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>These results indicate that while certain aspects of the AMPD are context-sensitive, the PPD may offset these fluctuations through both direct and indirect mechanisms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51042,"journal":{"name":"Encephale-Revue De Psychiatrie Clinique Biologique et Therapeutique","volume":"51 5","pages":"Pages 526-531"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The stability of the alternative model of personality disorders: Example of the situation related to Covid-19\",\"authors\":\"Serge Combaluzier, Chloé Bourgoise\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.encep.2024.11.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim and scope</h3><div>This article aims to explore the relationships between two key levels (Criteria A and B) in the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD). Specifically, it examines the articulation between the level of personality functioning (LPF) and the pathological personality dimensions (PPD) to understand their respective contributions to personality disorder (PD) diagnosis.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>We analyzed data collected through the LPFS-BR and PID-5-BF instruments from two randomized samples of non-clinical participants, gathered both before (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->124) and after (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->126) the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent lockdown. Mediation analyses were conducted to clarify how LPF and PPD interact in the assessment of PDs.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Findings indicate notable intensity differences in LPF levels (<em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.001, Cohen's d<!--> <!-->><!--> <!-->0.92), alongside high stability in both overall PD severity and PPD traits (<em>P</em> <!-->><!--> <!-->0.05). Regression analysis allowed us to examine the combined effects of Lockdown, Identity, and Detachment on PD severity through mediation modelling. Results suggest that Identity mediates the effects of both Lockdown and Detachment, with Detachment also having a direct impact.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>These results indicate that while certain aspects of the AMPD are context-sensitive, the PPD may offset these fluctuations through both direct and indirect mechanisms.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Encephale-Revue De Psychiatrie Clinique Biologique et Therapeutique\",\"volume\":\"51 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 526-531\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Encephale-Revue De Psychiatrie Clinique Biologique et Therapeutique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013700625000090\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Encephale-Revue De Psychiatrie Clinique Biologique et Therapeutique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013700625000090","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
The stability of the alternative model of personality disorders: Example of the situation related to Covid-19
Aim and scope
This article aims to explore the relationships between two key levels (Criteria A and B) in the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD). Specifically, it examines the articulation between the level of personality functioning (LPF) and the pathological personality dimensions (PPD) to understand their respective contributions to personality disorder (PD) diagnosis.
Method
We analyzed data collected through the LPFS-BR and PID-5-BF instruments from two randomized samples of non-clinical participants, gathered both before (n = 124) and after (n = 126) the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent lockdown. Mediation analyses were conducted to clarify how LPF and PPD interact in the assessment of PDs.
Results
Findings indicate notable intensity differences in LPF levels (P < 0.001, Cohen's d > 0.92), alongside high stability in both overall PD severity and PPD traits (P > 0.05). Regression analysis allowed us to examine the combined effects of Lockdown, Identity, and Detachment on PD severity through mediation modelling. Results suggest that Identity mediates the effects of both Lockdown and Detachment, with Detachment also having a direct impact.
Discussion
These results indicate that while certain aspects of the AMPD are context-sensitive, the PPD may offset these fluctuations through both direct and indirect mechanisms.
期刊介绍:
Une revue française de renommée internationale.
- Un comite de rédaction représentant tous les aspects de la prise en charge psychiatrique du patient.
- Une sélection rigoureuse d''articles faisant l''objet de plusieurs expertises.
- Des travaux d''auteurs et de chercheurs de renommée internationale.
- Des indexations dans les grandes bases de données (Current Contents, Excerpta Medica, etc.).
- Un facteur d''impact qui témoigne de la grande notoriété de la revue.
La tribune des publications originales de haut niveau.
- Une très grande diversité des sujets traités, rigoureusement sélectionnés à travers des sommaires dynamiques :
- des éditoriaux de médecins référents,
- une revue de presse sur les actualités internationales,
- des articles originaux pour approfondir vos connaissances,
- des mises au point et des cas cliniques pour engager votre réflexion sur les indications et choix possibles au travers de mises en situation clinique,
- des dossiers thématiques pour faire le tour d''une question.
- L''actualité de l''AFPB : L''Encéphale publie régulièrement des comptes rendus de l''Association française de psychiatrie clinique.