绘制开源健康经济模型的景观:一个系统的数据库回顾和分析。

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Raymond H Henderson, Chris Sampson, Xavier G L V Pouwels, Stephanie Harvard, Ron Handels, Talitha Feenstra, Ramesh Bhandari, Aryana Sepassi, Renée Arnold
{"title":"绘制开源健康经济模型的景观:一个系统的数据库回顾和分析。","authors":"Raymond H Henderson, Chris Sampson, Xavier G L V Pouwels, Stephanie Harvard, Ron Handels, Talitha Feenstra, Ramesh Bhandari, Aryana Sepassi, Renée Arnold","doi":"10.1016/j.jval.2025.01.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Health economic models are crucial for health technology assessments to evaluate the value of medical interventions. Open-source models (OSMs), in which source code and calculations are publicly accessible, enhance transparency, efficiency, credibility, and reproducibility. This study systematically reviewed databases to map the landscape of available OSMs in health economics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic database review was conducted, informed by guidance from ISPOR's OSM Special Interest Group. Eleven databases and specific OSM repositories were searched using predefined terms. Identified models were screened and duplicates were removed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search yielded 8664 hits, resulting in 182 unique OSMs. GitHub hosted the majority (74%), followed by Zenodo (11%). R was the predominant software platform (64%). Infectious disease was the most common application domain (29%). Markov models were the most frequent model type (49%). Licensing with Creative Commons was typical. Government and academic institutions were the primary sponsors, although many models lacked clear sponsorship.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review highlights the diversity and availability of open-source models (OSMs) in health economics, predominantly hosted on GitHub and developed using R. The models span various medical fields, with a strong focus on infectious diseases, oncology, and neurology. Ensuring clear licensing and standardized reporting is crucial to maximizing their impact. A combined approach of repository searches and traditional literature reviews provides a comprehensive method for identifying OSMs. Future efforts should enhance search strategies, improve reporting standards, and leverage OSMs to inform health policy decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":23508,"journal":{"name":"Value in Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mapping the Landscape of Open Source Health Economic Models: A Systematic Database Review and Analysis: An ISPOR Special Interest Group Report.\",\"authors\":\"Raymond H Henderson, Chris Sampson, Xavier G L V Pouwels, Stephanie Harvard, Ron Handels, Talitha Feenstra, Ramesh Bhandari, Aryana Sepassi, Renée Arnold\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jval.2025.01.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Health economic models are crucial for health technology assessments to evaluate the value of medical interventions. Open-source models (OSMs), in which source code and calculations are publicly accessible, enhance transparency, efficiency, credibility, and reproducibility. This study systematically reviewed databases to map the landscape of available OSMs in health economics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic database review was conducted, informed by guidance from ISPOR's OSM Special Interest Group. Eleven databases and specific OSM repositories were searched using predefined terms. Identified models were screened and duplicates were removed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search yielded 8664 hits, resulting in 182 unique OSMs. GitHub hosted the majority (74%), followed by Zenodo (11%). R was the predominant software platform (64%). Infectious disease was the most common application domain (29%). Markov models were the most frequent model type (49%). Licensing with Creative Commons was typical. Government and academic institutions were the primary sponsors, although many models lacked clear sponsorship.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review highlights the diversity and availability of open-source models (OSMs) in health economics, predominantly hosted on GitHub and developed using R. The models span various medical fields, with a strong focus on infectious diseases, oncology, and neurology. Ensuring clear licensing and standardized reporting is crucial to maximizing their impact. A combined approach of repository searches and traditional literature reviews provides a comprehensive method for identifying OSMs. Future efforts should enhance search strategies, improve reporting standards, and leverage OSMs to inform health policy decisions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Value in Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Value in Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2025.01.019\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2025.01.019","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:卫生经济模型对卫生技术评估至关重要,以评估医疗干预措施的价值。开放源代码模型(osm),其中源代码和计算是可公开访问的,增强了透明度、效率、可信度和再现性。本研究系统地回顾了数据库,以绘制卫生经济学中可用osm的景观。方法:在ISPOR OSM特别兴趣小组的指导下,进行了系统的数据库审查。使用预定义的术语搜索11个数据库和特定的OSM存储库。筛选已识别的模型并删除重复的模型。结果:搜索产生8,664个结果,产生182个唯一的oms。GitHub托管了大多数(74%),其次是Zenodo(11%)。R是主要的软件平台(64%)。传染病是最常见的应用领域(29%)。马尔可夫模型是最常见的模型类型(49%)。使用知识共享授权就是典型的例子。政府和学术机构是主要的赞助者,尽管许多模式缺乏明确的赞助者。讨论:本综述确定了主要托管在GitHub上并使用r开发的各种osm。这些模型涵盖了广泛的医学领域,其中大多数集中在传染病上。许可的明确性和标准化报告对于最大化OSM的影响至关重要。将存储库搜索与传统文献搜索相结合,提供了一种识别osm的综合方法。结论:本综述强调了卫生经济学中osm的可获得性和多样性,主要利用R,重点关注传染病、肿瘤学和神经病学。未来的工作应加强搜索能力,规范模型报告,并利用管理信息系统对卫生政策的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mapping the Landscape of Open Source Health Economic Models: A Systematic Database Review and Analysis: An ISPOR Special Interest Group Report.

Objectives: Health economic models are crucial for health technology assessments to evaluate the value of medical interventions. Open-source models (OSMs), in which source code and calculations are publicly accessible, enhance transparency, efficiency, credibility, and reproducibility. This study systematically reviewed databases to map the landscape of available OSMs in health economics.

Methods: A systematic database review was conducted, informed by guidance from ISPOR's OSM Special Interest Group. Eleven databases and specific OSM repositories were searched using predefined terms. Identified models were screened and duplicates were removed.

Results: The search yielded 8664 hits, resulting in 182 unique OSMs. GitHub hosted the majority (74%), followed by Zenodo (11%). R was the predominant software platform (64%). Infectious disease was the most common application domain (29%). Markov models were the most frequent model type (49%). Licensing with Creative Commons was typical. Government and academic institutions were the primary sponsors, although many models lacked clear sponsorship.

Conclusions: This review highlights the diversity and availability of open-source models (OSMs) in health economics, predominantly hosted on GitHub and developed using R. The models span various medical fields, with a strong focus on infectious diseases, oncology, and neurology. Ensuring clear licensing and standardized reporting is crucial to maximizing their impact. A combined approach of repository searches and traditional literature reviews provides a comprehensive method for identifying OSMs. Future efforts should enhance search strategies, improve reporting standards, and leverage OSMs to inform health policy decisions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Value in Health
Value in Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
3064
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Value in Health contains original research articles for pharmacoeconomics, health economics, and outcomes research (clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes/preference-based research), as well as conceptual and health policy articles that provide valuable information for health care decision-makers as well as the research community. As the official journal of ISPOR, Value in Health provides a forum for researchers, as well as health care decision-makers to translate outcomes research into health care decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信