{"title":"对减少医疗环境足迹的干预措施进行范围审查。","authors":"Anna-Veera Seppänen, Zeynep Or","doi":"10.1016/j.jval.2025.01.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The healthcare sector contributes significantly to global warming, yet strategies for reducing its impact are not well integrated into health policy. This scoping review aimed to identify the range of effective interventions that can reduce the environmental footprint of healthcare, and to provide an overview of their impact.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched for peer-reviewed articles published in English, French or Swedish between 2010 and September 2024 in Medline and Web of Science, following the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines and the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews. Publications were selected by two researchers and a documentalist. Data from included studies were extracted and synthesized in tables and described in a narrative synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified seven systematic reviews and 44 original research articles. Most of the effective interventions targeted hospitals and varied from energy saving practices and reducing potent anaesthetic gases to changing care protocols and improving waste management. The measured impact of interventions was context-specific and depended on national energy sources. Only a few studies reported on the impact of structural and strategic changes in healthcare provision, across care settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is an urgent need for better understanding the costs and benefits of diffusing effective green interventions across care providers and developing more systemic approaches for optimising care provision and use, to achieve a meaningful impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":23508,"journal":{"name":"Value in Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A scoping review of interventions to reduce the environmental footprint of healthcare.\",\"authors\":\"Anna-Veera Seppänen, Zeynep Or\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jval.2025.01.021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The healthcare sector contributes significantly to global warming, yet strategies for reducing its impact are not well integrated into health policy. This scoping review aimed to identify the range of effective interventions that can reduce the environmental footprint of healthcare, and to provide an overview of their impact.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched for peer-reviewed articles published in English, French or Swedish between 2010 and September 2024 in Medline and Web of Science, following the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines and the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews. Publications were selected by two researchers and a documentalist. Data from included studies were extracted and synthesized in tables and described in a narrative synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified seven systematic reviews and 44 original research articles. Most of the effective interventions targeted hospitals and varied from energy saving practices and reducing potent anaesthetic gases to changing care protocols and improving waste management. The measured impact of interventions was context-specific and depended on national energy sources. Only a few studies reported on the impact of structural and strategic changes in healthcare provision, across care settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is an urgent need for better understanding the costs and benefits of diffusing effective green interventions across care providers and developing more systemic approaches for optimising care provision and use, to achieve a meaningful impact.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Value in Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Value in Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2025.01.021\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2025.01.021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
A scoping review of interventions to reduce the environmental footprint of healthcare.
Background: The healthcare sector contributes significantly to global warming, yet strategies for reducing its impact are not well integrated into health policy. This scoping review aimed to identify the range of effective interventions that can reduce the environmental footprint of healthcare, and to provide an overview of their impact.
Methods: We searched for peer-reviewed articles published in English, French or Swedish between 2010 and September 2024 in Medline and Web of Science, following the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines and the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews. Publications were selected by two researchers and a documentalist. Data from included studies were extracted and synthesized in tables and described in a narrative synthesis.
Results: We identified seven systematic reviews and 44 original research articles. Most of the effective interventions targeted hospitals and varied from energy saving practices and reducing potent anaesthetic gases to changing care protocols and improving waste management. The measured impact of interventions was context-specific and depended on national energy sources. Only a few studies reported on the impact of structural and strategic changes in healthcare provision, across care settings.
Conclusions: There is an urgent need for better understanding the costs and benefits of diffusing effective green interventions across care providers and developing more systemic approaches for optimising care provision and use, to achieve a meaningful impact.
期刊介绍:
Value in Health contains original research articles for pharmacoeconomics, health economics, and outcomes research (clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes/preference-based research), as well as conceptual and health policy articles that provide valuable information for health care decision-makers as well as the research community. As the official journal of ISPOR, Value in Health provides a forum for researchers, as well as health care decision-makers to translate outcomes research into health care decisions.