建立回避型限制性食物摄入障碍与儿童喂养障碍诊断联系的重要跳板。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
William G. Sharp, Jaclyn L. Pederson
{"title":"建立回避型限制性食物摄入障碍与儿童喂养障碍诊断联系的重要跳板。","authors":"William G. Sharp,&nbsp;Jaclyn L. Pederson","doi":"10.1002/eat.24393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Diagnostic ambiguity has surrounded the two primary diagnoses for dysfunctional feeding and eating in pediatric populations—that is, pediatric feeding disorder (PFD) and avoidant restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID). Recent expert consensus emphasized the need for diagnostic refinement to enhance understanding and improve clinical and research activities for both conditions. With the proposed revision of ARFID, Zickgraf and colleagues provide a research grounded springboard for beginning the revision process. The proposal centers upon a new Criterion A that emphasizes ARFID as a disorder driven by a negative, temporally proximate association with eating/food involving three distinct, yet potentially co-occurring responses of disgust/distaste, anhedonia/uncomfortable fullness, and acute fear/panic. In this commentary, we consider the potential benefits of the proposed framework from the PFD perspective and identify three additional areas—DSM text revisions, benefits of a shared feeding and eating disorder diagnosis, and a call for education and advocacy to complement future revisions—for further consideration during work to improve PFD and ARFID diagnostic systems.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51067,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":"58 5","pages":"853-856"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Important Springboard Toward Establishing Diagnostic Connection Between Avoidant Restrictive Food Intake Disorder and Pediatric Feeding Disorder\",\"authors\":\"William G. Sharp,&nbsp;Jaclyn L. Pederson\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/eat.24393\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Diagnostic ambiguity has surrounded the two primary diagnoses for dysfunctional feeding and eating in pediatric populations—that is, pediatric feeding disorder (PFD) and avoidant restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID). Recent expert consensus emphasized the need for diagnostic refinement to enhance understanding and improve clinical and research activities for both conditions. With the proposed revision of ARFID, Zickgraf and colleagues provide a research grounded springboard for beginning the revision process. The proposal centers upon a new Criterion A that emphasizes ARFID as a disorder driven by a negative, temporally proximate association with eating/food involving three distinct, yet potentially co-occurring responses of disgust/distaste, anhedonia/uncomfortable fullness, and acute fear/panic. In this commentary, we consider the potential benefits of the proposed framework from the PFD perspective and identify three additional areas—DSM text revisions, benefits of a shared feeding and eating disorder diagnosis, and a call for education and advocacy to complement future revisions—for further consideration during work to improve PFD and ARFID diagnostic systems.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Eating Disorders\",\"volume\":\"58 5\",\"pages\":\"853-856\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Eating Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eat.24393\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eat.24393","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在儿科人群中,两种主要的喂养和饮食功能失调的诊断存在歧义,即儿科喂养障碍(PFD)和回避性限制性食物摄入障碍(ARFID)。最近的专家共识强调需要改进诊断,以加强对这两种疾病的理解和改进临床和研究活动。通过ARFID的修订,Zickgraf及其同事为开始修订过程提供了一个研究基础跳板。该提案以新的标准a为中心,强调ARFID是一种由与饮食/食物的负面的、暂时的近似关联驱动的疾病,涉及三种不同的、但可能同时发生的反应:厌恶/厌恶、快感缺乏/不舒服的饱腹感和急性恐惧/恐慌。在这篇评论中,我们从PFD的角度考虑了拟议框架的潜在好处,并确定了三个额外的领域- dsm文本修订,共享喂养和饮食失调诊断的好处,以及呼吁教育和宣传补充未来的修订-在改进PFD和ARFID诊断系统的工作中进一步考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Important Springboard Toward Establishing Diagnostic Connection Between Avoidant Restrictive Food Intake Disorder and Pediatric Feeding Disorder

Diagnostic ambiguity has surrounded the two primary diagnoses for dysfunctional feeding and eating in pediatric populations—that is, pediatric feeding disorder (PFD) and avoidant restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID). Recent expert consensus emphasized the need for diagnostic refinement to enhance understanding and improve clinical and research activities for both conditions. With the proposed revision of ARFID, Zickgraf and colleagues provide a research grounded springboard for beginning the revision process. The proposal centers upon a new Criterion A that emphasizes ARFID as a disorder driven by a negative, temporally proximate association with eating/food involving three distinct, yet potentially co-occurring responses of disgust/distaste, anhedonia/uncomfortable fullness, and acute fear/panic. In this commentary, we consider the potential benefits of the proposed framework from the PFD perspective and identify three additional areas—DSM text revisions, benefits of a shared feeding and eating disorder diagnosis, and a call for education and advocacy to complement future revisions—for further consideration during work to improve PFD and ARFID diagnostic systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
12.70%
发文量
204
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Articles featured in the journal describe state-of-the-art scientific research on theory, methodology, etiology, clinical practice, and policy related to eating disorders, as well as contributions that facilitate scholarly critique and discussion of science and practice in the field. Theoretical and empirical work on obesity or healthy eating falls within the journal’s scope inasmuch as it facilitates the advancement of efforts to describe and understand, prevent, or treat eating disorders. IJED welcomes submissions from all regions of the world and representing all levels of inquiry (including basic science, clinical trials, implementation research, and dissemination studies), and across a full range of scientific methods, disciplines, and approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信