Erin S Isbilen, Abigail Laver, Noam Siegelman, James S Magnuson, Richard N Aslin
{"title":"在文本的海洋中寻找单词:单词搜索作为对阅读统计规律敏感性的测量。","authors":"Erin S Isbilen, Abigail Laver, Noam Siegelman, James S Magnuson, Richard N Aslin","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Statistical learning (SL) is hypothesized to play a fundamental role in reading, yet the correlations between reading and SL are largely mixed. This inconsistency may result from the fact that most SL studies train participants to learn novel, nonlinguistic visual regularities, which overlooks two important factors: (a) SL performance varies across domains, and (b) most SL studies utilize tasks with short exposure phases with a limited set of novel structured stimuli. Rather than exposing participants to novel statistics, we explored how prior learning of the statistical regularities inherent in natural texts predicts individual differences in reading. We developed a novel measure of long-term orthographic SL by assessing participants' ability to chunk letter information based on its statistical properties. Adults were prompted to find high- and low-frequency English words (derived from written-language corpora) when a single target word was embedded in an array of background distractors comprising letters that do not form words. Performance on this task was compared against three established measures of component skills of reading: lexical decision, orthographic awareness, and spelling recognition. Participants were faster and more accurate at identifying high-frequency words, replicating classic psycholinguistic results. Performance was also impacted by semantic diversity-the variation of the semantic contexts a word appears in-independent of frequency. Critically, word search performance significantly predicted each reading subtest, suggesting that the task draws upon key reading-related skills. Sensitivity to orthographic statistical structure may serve as a crucial foundation that drives individual differences in reading, consistent with SL-based accounts of language. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Finding words in a sea of text: Word search as a measure of sensitivity to statistical regularities in reading.\",\"authors\":\"Erin S Isbilen, Abigail Laver, Noam Siegelman, James S Magnuson, Richard N Aslin\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/xlm0001412\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Statistical learning (SL) is hypothesized to play a fundamental role in reading, yet the correlations between reading and SL are largely mixed. This inconsistency may result from the fact that most SL studies train participants to learn novel, nonlinguistic visual regularities, which overlooks two important factors: (a) SL performance varies across domains, and (b) most SL studies utilize tasks with short exposure phases with a limited set of novel structured stimuli. Rather than exposing participants to novel statistics, we explored how prior learning of the statistical regularities inherent in natural texts predicts individual differences in reading. We developed a novel measure of long-term orthographic SL by assessing participants' ability to chunk letter information based on its statistical properties. Adults were prompted to find high- and low-frequency English words (derived from written-language corpora) when a single target word was embedded in an array of background distractors comprising letters that do not form words. Performance on this task was compared against three established measures of component skills of reading: lexical decision, orthographic awareness, and spelling recognition. Participants were faster and more accurate at identifying high-frequency words, replicating classic psycholinguistic results. Performance was also impacted by semantic diversity-the variation of the semantic contexts a word appears in-independent of frequency. Critically, word search performance significantly predicted each reading subtest, suggesting that the task draws upon key reading-related skills. Sensitivity to orthographic statistical structure may serve as a crucial foundation that drives individual differences in reading, consistent with SL-based accounts of language. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001412\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001412","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
统计学习(SL)被假设在阅读中起着基本的作用,然而阅读和SL之间的相关性在很大程度上是混合的。这种不一致可能是由于大多数SL研究训练参与者学习新颖的、非语言的视觉规律,这忽略了两个重要因素:(a) SL表现在不同领域有所不同,(b)大多数SL研究使用的任务是短暴露阶段和有限的新颖结构化刺激。我们不是让参与者接触新颖的统计数据,而是探索自然文本中固有的统计规律的先验学习如何预测阅读中的个体差异。我们开发了一种新的长期正字法语言的测量方法,通过评估参与者基于其统计特性的大块字母信息的能力。当一个单一的目标单词被嵌入一组由不构成单词的字母组成的背景干扰物中时,成年人被提示去寻找高频和低频的英语单词(来自书面语言语料库)。这项任务的表现与三项既定的阅读组成技能的衡量标准进行了比较:词汇决定、正字法意识和拼写识别。参与者在识别高频词方面更快、更准确,复制了经典的心理语言学结果。语义多样性(一个单词出现的语义上下文的变化)也会影响性能,而这与频率无关。关键的是,单词搜索性能显著地预测了每个阅读子测试,这表明该任务需要关键的阅读相关技能。对正字法统计结构的敏感性可能是驱动阅读个体差异的重要基础,这与基于语言的语言描述一致。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
Finding words in a sea of text: Word search as a measure of sensitivity to statistical regularities in reading.
Statistical learning (SL) is hypothesized to play a fundamental role in reading, yet the correlations between reading and SL are largely mixed. This inconsistency may result from the fact that most SL studies train participants to learn novel, nonlinguistic visual regularities, which overlooks two important factors: (a) SL performance varies across domains, and (b) most SL studies utilize tasks with short exposure phases with a limited set of novel structured stimuli. Rather than exposing participants to novel statistics, we explored how prior learning of the statistical regularities inherent in natural texts predicts individual differences in reading. We developed a novel measure of long-term orthographic SL by assessing participants' ability to chunk letter information based on its statistical properties. Adults were prompted to find high- and low-frequency English words (derived from written-language corpora) when a single target word was embedded in an array of background distractors comprising letters that do not form words. Performance on this task was compared against three established measures of component skills of reading: lexical decision, orthographic awareness, and spelling recognition. Participants were faster and more accurate at identifying high-frequency words, replicating classic psycholinguistic results. Performance was also impacted by semantic diversity-the variation of the semantic contexts a word appears in-independent of frequency. Critically, word search performance significantly predicted each reading subtest, suggesting that the task draws upon key reading-related skills. Sensitivity to orthographic statistical structure may serve as a crucial foundation that drives individual differences in reading, consistent with SL-based accounts of language. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition publishes studies on perception, control of action, perceptual aspects of language processing, and related cognitive processes.