由于缺乏预期的普遍空间视图,路径整合后方向中断。

IF 2.2 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY
Yue Chen, Weimin Mou
{"title":"由于缺乏预期的普遍空间视图,路径整合后方向中断。","authors":"Yue Chen, Weimin Mou","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Two previous studies indicated that removing expected landmarks disrupts homing, a new phenomenon concerning the interplay between path integration and landmark-based navigation. This study systematically investigated when this disruption occurs, which spatial representations are disrupted, and whether lessening landmark prevalence mitigates this disruption. In immersive virtual environments, against three landmarks, participants learned the location of a home object (Experiments 2 and 3), plus two additional objects (Experiment 1), or plus four additional objects (Experiments 4 and 5). They then navigated an outbound path originating from the home object. After participants' views were blocked, landmarks were revealed for nine standard paths/trials but removed in a subsequent catch trial, except in Experiment 3 where a curtain kept landmarks concealed. In Experiment 5, landmarks were rotated instead of being removed in the second catch trial. Participants replaced the home object in standard trials but all objects in catch trials. Baseline trials, which were identical to the catch trials except for no landmarks throughout the trials, followed catch trials. The results showed larger homing errors in first catch trials than baseline trials when landmarks were removed (Experiment 2) but not when the curtain concealed the landmarks (Experiment 3). For experiments with multiple objects, participants' represented position and heading were calculated based on the replaced and correct locations. Experiment 1 showed disrupted homing and heading estimates but intact position estimates, while Experiments 4 and 5 showed no disruption. Additionally, participants followed rotated landmarks in Experiment 5. These findings provide a comprehensive picture of the interplay between path integration and landmarks in familiar environments. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disrupted orientation after path integration by absence of anticipated prevalent spatial views.\",\"authors\":\"Yue Chen, Weimin Mou\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/xlm0001439\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Two previous studies indicated that removing expected landmarks disrupts homing, a new phenomenon concerning the interplay between path integration and landmark-based navigation. This study systematically investigated when this disruption occurs, which spatial representations are disrupted, and whether lessening landmark prevalence mitigates this disruption. In immersive virtual environments, against three landmarks, participants learned the location of a home object (Experiments 2 and 3), plus two additional objects (Experiment 1), or plus four additional objects (Experiments 4 and 5). They then navigated an outbound path originating from the home object. After participants' views were blocked, landmarks were revealed for nine standard paths/trials but removed in a subsequent catch trial, except in Experiment 3 where a curtain kept landmarks concealed. In Experiment 5, landmarks were rotated instead of being removed in the second catch trial. Participants replaced the home object in standard trials but all objects in catch trials. Baseline trials, which were identical to the catch trials except for no landmarks throughout the trials, followed catch trials. The results showed larger homing errors in first catch trials than baseline trials when landmarks were removed (Experiment 2) but not when the curtain concealed the landmarks (Experiment 3). For experiments with multiple objects, participants' represented position and heading were calculated based on the replaced and correct locations. Experiment 1 showed disrupted homing and heading estimates but intact position estimates, while Experiments 4 and 5 showed no disruption. Additionally, participants followed rotated landmarks in Experiment 5. These findings provide a comprehensive picture of the interplay between path integration and landmarks in familiar environments. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001439\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001439","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

先前的两项研究表明,移除预期的地标会破坏导航,这是一种关于路径整合和基于地标的导航之间相互作用的新现象。本研究系统地调查了这种破坏何时发生,哪些空间表征被破坏,以及减少地标性流行是否会减轻这种破坏。在沉浸式虚拟环境中,针对三个地标,参与者了解了家居物品的位置(实验2和3),加上两个额外的物体(实验1),或者加上四个额外的物体(实验4和5)。然后,他们导航一条从家居物品出发的出站路径。在参与者的视线被遮挡后,在9个标准路径/试验中,地标被显示出来,但在随后的捕捉试验中被删除,除了在实验3中,窗帘将地标隐藏起来。在实验5中,标记物在第二次捕获试验中不被移除,而是被旋转。参与者在标准试验中替换了家里的东西,但在捕捉试验中替换了所有的东西。基线试验与捕获试验相同,但在整个试验过程中没有里程碑,随后进行捕获试验。结果表明,当路标被移除(实验2)时,首次捕获试验的寻的误差大于基线试验(实验3),而当窗帘隐藏路标时,寻的误差大于基线试验(实验3)。对于多目标实验,参与者的代表位置和航向是基于替换位置和正确位置计算的。实验1显示归向和航向估计中断,但位置估计完整,而实验4和5未显示中断。此外,在实验5中,参与者遵循旋转的地标。这些发现为熟悉环境中路径整合和路标之间的相互作用提供了一个全面的图景。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disrupted orientation after path integration by absence of anticipated prevalent spatial views.

Two previous studies indicated that removing expected landmarks disrupts homing, a new phenomenon concerning the interplay between path integration and landmark-based navigation. This study systematically investigated when this disruption occurs, which spatial representations are disrupted, and whether lessening landmark prevalence mitigates this disruption. In immersive virtual environments, against three landmarks, participants learned the location of a home object (Experiments 2 and 3), plus two additional objects (Experiment 1), or plus four additional objects (Experiments 4 and 5). They then navigated an outbound path originating from the home object. After participants' views were blocked, landmarks were revealed for nine standard paths/trials but removed in a subsequent catch trial, except in Experiment 3 where a curtain kept landmarks concealed. In Experiment 5, landmarks were rotated instead of being removed in the second catch trial. Participants replaced the home object in standard trials but all objects in catch trials. Baseline trials, which were identical to the catch trials except for no landmarks throughout the trials, followed catch trials. The results showed larger homing errors in first catch trials than baseline trials when landmarks were removed (Experiment 2) but not when the curtain concealed the landmarks (Experiment 3). For experiments with multiple objects, participants' represented position and heading were calculated based on the replaced and correct locations. Experiment 1 showed disrupted homing and heading estimates but intact position estimates, while Experiments 4 and 5 showed no disruption. Additionally, participants followed rotated landmarks in Experiment 5. These findings provide a comprehensive picture of the interplay between path integration and landmarks in familiar environments. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
163
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition publishes studies on perception, control of action, perceptual aspects of language processing, and related cognitive processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信