对最近选择的地点的注意力偏向有多不灵活?

IF 2.2 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY
Daniel Toledano, Dominique Lamy
{"title":"对最近选择的地点的注意力偏向有多不灵活?","authors":"Daniel Toledano, Dominique Lamy","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Attention is strongly biased toward the location where a previous target was recently found. This priming-of-location (PoL) effect is taken to indicate that selecting an object automatically and proactively enhances the attentional priority at its location. This account predicts that PoL should be unaffected by changes in task context. Here, we tested this prediction. In Experiments 1 and 2, we manipulated task context by interleaving <i>search</i> trials (2/3) where participants searched for a shape target, <i>search-probe</i> trials where they reported letters briefly superimposed on the search display after a short delay, and <i>probe</i> trials where only the to-be-reported letters appeared. We measured PoL on probe reports when the task context repeated (search → search-probe sequences) and when it changed (search → probe sequences). We found PoL to be insensitive to task changes, indicating that attention is proactively guided to previously selected locations by default, even in variable task environments. We then examined whether expectations about the upcoming task modulate PoL by inverting the task probabilities (2/3 probe trials and 1/3 search trials) in Experiment 3 and by informing participants with 100% validity as to what their next task would be, in Experiment 4. We found PoL to decline sharply as the expectation of a task change increased. We conclude that PoL is proactive but flexible. We discuss two possible mechanisms to explain these findings: proactive attenuation and proactive retrieval, both of which entail that priorities from previous selections are reduced as a by-product of participants' reconfiguring their task set. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How inflexible is the attentional bias toward recently selected locations?\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Toledano, Dominique Lamy\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/xlm0001452\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Attention is strongly biased toward the location where a previous target was recently found. This priming-of-location (PoL) effect is taken to indicate that selecting an object automatically and proactively enhances the attentional priority at its location. This account predicts that PoL should be unaffected by changes in task context. Here, we tested this prediction. In Experiments 1 and 2, we manipulated task context by interleaving <i>search</i> trials (2/3) where participants searched for a shape target, <i>search-probe</i> trials where they reported letters briefly superimposed on the search display after a short delay, and <i>probe</i> trials where only the to-be-reported letters appeared. We measured PoL on probe reports when the task context repeated (search → search-probe sequences) and when it changed (search → probe sequences). We found PoL to be insensitive to task changes, indicating that attention is proactively guided to previously selected locations by default, even in variable task environments. We then examined whether expectations about the upcoming task modulate PoL by inverting the task probabilities (2/3 probe trials and 1/3 search trials) in Experiment 3 and by informing participants with 100% validity as to what their next task would be, in Experiment 4. We found PoL to decline sharply as the expectation of a task change increased. We conclude that PoL is proactive but flexible. We discuss two possible mechanisms to explain these findings: proactive attenuation and proactive retrieval, both of which entail that priorities from previous selections are reduced as a by-product of participants' reconfiguring their task set. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001452\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001452","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们的注意力强烈地偏向于上一个目标最近被发现的地点。这种位置启动效应表明,自动和主动地选择一个物体会增强其在该位置的注意优先级。该帐户预测PoL应该不受任务上下文更改的影响。在这里,我们测试了这个预测。在实验1和2中,我们通过交错的搜索试验(2/3)来操纵任务上下文,在搜索试验中,参与者搜索形状目标,搜索-探针试验中,他们在短时间延迟后报告在搜索显示上短暂叠加的字母,以及探针试验中,只出现待报告的字母。当任务上下文重复(搜索→搜索-探测序列)和当它改变(搜索→探测序列)时,我们测量了探测报告上的PoL。我们发现PoL对任务变化不敏感,这表明即使在可变的任务环境中,注意力也会被默认地主动引导到先前选择的位置。然后,我们通过在实验3中反转任务概率(2/3探查试验和1/3搜索试验)以及在实验4中以100%的有效性告知参与者他们的下一个任务将是什么,来检查对即将到来的任务的期望是否会调节PoL。我们发现,随着任务变化预期的增加,PoL急剧下降。我们的结论是,PoL是主动的,但也很灵活。我们讨论了两种可能的机制来解释这些发现:主动衰减和主动检索,这两种机制都需要从先前的选择中减少优先级,作为参与者重新配置任务集的副产品。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How inflexible is the attentional bias toward recently selected locations?

Attention is strongly biased toward the location where a previous target was recently found. This priming-of-location (PoL) effect is taken to indicate that selecting an object automatically and proactively enhances the attentional priority at its location. This account predicts that PoL should be unaffected by changes in task context. Here, we tested this prediction. In Experiments 1 and 2, we manipulated task context by interleaving search trials (2/3) where participants searched for a shape target, search-probe trials where they reported letters briefly superimposed on the search display after a short delay, and probe trials where only the to-be-reported letters appeared. We measured PoL on probe reports when the task context repeated (search → search-probe sequences) and when it changed (search → probe sequences). We found PoL to be insensitive to task changes, indicating that attention is proactively guided to previously selected locations by default, even in variable task environments. We then examined whether expectations about the upcoming task modulate PoL by inverting the task probabilities (2/3 probe trials and 1/3 search trials) in Experiment 3 and by informing participants with 100% validity as to what their next task would be, in Experiment 4. We found PoL to decline sharply as the expectation of a task change increased. We conclude that PoL is proactive but flexible. We discuss two possible mechanisms to explain these findings: proactive attenuation and proactive retrieval, both of which entail that priorities from previous selections are reduced as a by-product of participants' reconfiguring their task set. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
163
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition publishes studies on perception, control of action, perceptual aspects of language processing, and related cognitive processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信