理论化学术:关注人类发展和家庭科学

IF 3.2 1区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Ramona Faith Oswald, Anisa M. Zvonkovic
{"title":"理论化学术:关注人类发展和家庭科学","authors":"Ramona Faith Oswald,&nbsp;Anisa M. Zvonkovic","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This special issue explores the positionality of feminist administrators within Human Development and Family Science (HDFS) and their efforts to enhance the discipline's visibility, value, and impact. Drawing from extensive administrative and leadership experiences, the contributors examine the status and boundaries of HDFS in higher education, addressing issues such as devaluation linked to masculinist ideologies, structural challenges, and the need for equitable power distribution. The collection also critiques neoliberalism in academia, advocating for human well-being as the core of HDFS programs. Key themes include the historical and societal contexts of HDFS, critical problems such as burnout and trauma, diverse contributions, and the intellectual work of administration. The issue calls for a transformation in higher education that prioritizes human dignity, inclusivity, and meaningful community engagement, aiming for a more just and effective academic system.</p>","PeriodicalId":47446,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","volume":"17 1","pages":"7-11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jftr.12615","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Theorizing academia: Focus on human development and family science\",\"authors\":\"Ramona Faith Oswald,&nbsp;Anisa M. Zvonkovic\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jftr.12615\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This special issue explores the positionality of feminist administrators within Human Development and Family Science (HDFS) and their efforts to enhance the discipline's visibility, value, and impact. Drawing from extensive administrative and leadership experiences, the contributors examine the status and boundaries of HDFS in higher education, addressing issues such as devaluation linked to masculinist ideologies, structural challenges, and the need for equitable power distribution. The collection also critiques neoliberalism in academia, advocating for human well-being as the core of HDFS programs. Key themes include the historical and societal contexts of HDFS, critical problems such as burnout and trauma, diverse contributions, and the intellectual work of administration. The issue calls for a transformation in higher education that prioritizes human dignity, inclusivity, and meaningful community engagement, aiming for a more just and effective academic system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Family Theory & Review\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"7-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jftr.12615\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Family Theory & Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jftr.12615\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jftr.12615","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本期特刊探讨了女性主义管理者在人类发展与家庭科学(HDFS)中的地位,以及她们为提高该学科的知名度、价值和影响力所做的努力。从广泛的管理和领导经验中,作者审视了HDFS在高等教育中的地位和边界,解决了诸如与男性主义意识形态相关的贬值、结构性挑战以及公平权力分配的需求等问题。该系列还批评了学术界的新自由主义,主张将人类福祉作为HDFS程序的核心。关键主题包括HDFS的历史和社会背景,关键问题,如倦怠和创伤,多样化的贡献,以及管理的智力工作。这个问题要求高等教育转型,优先考虑人的尊严、包容性和有意义的社区参与,旨在建立一个更公正、更有效的学术体系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Theorizing academia: Focus on human development and family science

This special issue explores the positionality of feminist administrators within Human Development and Family Science (HDFS) and their efforts to enhance the discipline's visibility, value, and impact. Drawing from extensive administrative and leadership experiences, the contributors examine the status and boundaries of HDFS in higher education, addressing issues such as devaluation linked to masculinist ideologies, structural challenges, and the need for equitable power distribution. The collection also critiques neoliberalism in academia, advocating for human well-being as the core of HDFS programs. Key themes include the historical and societal contexts of HDFS, critical problems such as burnout and trauma, diverse contributions, and the intellectual work of administration. The issue calls for a transformation in higher education that prioritizes human dignity, inclusivity, and meaningful community engagement, aiming for a more just and effective academic system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信