与标准成像方式相比,乳腺短程MRI诊断致密乳腺乳腺癌的准确性。

IF 1.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Areej S Aloufi, Nuha Khoumais, Fayka Ahmed, Sara Hosawi, Sameera Sulimani, Deema Abunayyan, Fadiah Alghamdi, Samar Alshehri, Malak Alsaeed, Rasha Sahloul, Reem Sabir, Elaine F Harkness, Susan M Astley
{"title":"与标准成像方式相比,乳腺短程MRI诊断致密乳腺乳腺癌的准确性。","authors":"Areej S Aloufi, Nuha Khoumais, Fayka Ahmed, Sara Hosawi, Sameera Sulimani, Deema Abunayyan, Fadiah Alghamdi, Samar Alshehri, Malak Alsaeed, Rasha Sahloul, Reem Sabir, Elaine F Harkness, Susan M Astley","doi":"10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_58_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast density is an independent risk factor for breast cancer and affects the sensitivity of mammography screening. Therefore, new breast imaging approaches could benefit women with increased breast density in early cancer detection and diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the diagnostic performance of abbreviated breast MRI compared with mammography and other imaging modalities in screening and diagnosing breast cancer among Saudi women with dense breast tissue.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective diagnostic study was conducted using anonymized medical images and histopathology information from 55 women, aged ≥30 years, who had dense breasts (Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System [BI-RADS] breast density categories C and D) and an abnormal mammogram. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated for mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), synthetic mammography (SM) derived from DBT, ultrasound, and abbreviated breast MRI (ABMRI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 19 women had pathology-proven breast cancer. Among all methods, ABMRI showed the highest sensitivity (94.7%) and specificity (58.3%), while mammography showed the lowest (84.2% and 44.4%, respectively). AUC for ABMRI was higher than all the methods including mammography (0.751 vs. 0.643; <i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ABMRI appears to be more accurate in cancer diagnosis than mammography and other modalities for women with dense breast tissue. Further research is advised on a larger sample of Saudi women to confirm the benefit of ABMRI in breast cancer screening and diagnosis for women with increased breast density.</p>","PeriodicalId":21442,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Medicine & Medical Sciences","volume":"13 1","pages":"7-17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11809753/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of Abbreviated Breast MRI in Diagnosing Breast Cancer in Women with Dense Breasts Compared with Standard Imaging Modalities.\",\"authors\":\"Areej S Aloufi, Nuha Khoumais, Fayka Ahmed, Sara Hosawi, Sameera Sulimani, Deema Abunayyan, Fadiah Alghamdi, Samar Alshehri, Malak Alsaeed, Rasha Sahloul, Reem Sabir, Elaine F Harkness, Susan M Astley\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_58_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast density is an independent risk factor for breast cancer and affects the sensitivity of mammography screening. Therefore, new breast imaging approaches could benefit women with increased breast density in early cancer detection and diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the diagnostic performance of abbreviated breast MRI compared with mammography and other imaging modalities in screening and diagnosing breast cancer among Saudi women with dense breast tissue.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective diagnostic study was conducted using anonymized medical images and histopathology information from 55 women, aged ≥30 years, who had dense breasts (Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System [BI-RADS] breast density categories C and D) and an abnormal mammogram. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated for mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), synthetic mammography (SM) derived from DBT, ultrasound, and abbreviated breast MRI (ABMRI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 19 women had pathology-proven breast cancer. Among all methods, ABMRI showed the highest sensitivity (94.7%) and specificity (58.3%), while mammography showed the lowest (84.2% and 44.4%, respectively). AUC for ABMRI was higher than all the methods including mammography (0.751 vs. 0.643; <i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ABMRI appears to be more accurate in cancer diagnosis than mammography and other modalities for women with dense breast tissue. Further research is advised on a larger sample of Saudi women to confirm the benefit of ABMRI in breast cancer screening and diagnosis for women with increased breast density.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21442,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Saudi Journal of Medicine & Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"7-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11809753/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Saudi Journal of Medicine & Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_58_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Medicine & Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_58_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:乳腺密度是乳腺癌的独立危险因素,影响乳房x光检查的敏感性。因此,新的乳腺成像方法可以使乳腺密度增高的女性在早期癌症检测和诊断中受益。目的:评估在筛查和诊断沙特致密乳腺组织女性乳腺癌方面,短缩乳房MRI与乳房x光摄影和其他成像方式的诊断效果。方法:对55名年龄≥30岁、乳腺致密(乳腺成像和报告数据系统[BI-RADS]乳腺密度分类为C和D)且乳房x线检查异常的女性进行回顾性诊断研究。计算乳房x线摄影、数字乳房断层合成(DBT)、由DBT衍生的合成乳房x线摄影(SM)、超声和缩短乳房MRI (ABMRI)的敏感性、特异性和受者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)。结果:共有19名女性病理证实为乳腺癌。在所有方法中,ABMRI的敏感性最高(94.7%),特异性最高(58.3%),乳房x线摄影最低(分别为84.2%和44.4%)。ABMRI的AUC高于包括乳腺x线摄影在内的所有方法(0.751 vs. 0.643;P < 0.05)。结论:对于乳腺组织致密的女性,ABMRI似乎比乳房x光检查和其他方式更准确地诊断癌症。建议对更大的沙特妇女样本进行进一步研究,以确认ABMRI在乳腺癌筛查和诊断中对乳腺密度增加的妇女的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accuracy of Abbreviated Breast MRI in Diagnosing Breast Cancer in Women with Dense Breasts Compared with Standard Imaging Modalities.

Background: Breast density is an independent risk factor for breast cancer and affects the sensitivity of mammography screening. Therefore, new breast imaging approaches could benefit women with increased breast density in early cancer detection and diagnosis.

Objectives: To assess the diagnostic performance of abbreviated breast MRI compared with mammography and other imaging modalities in screening and diagnosing breast cancer among Saudi women with dense breast tissue.

Methods: A retrospective diagnostic study was conducted using anonymized medical images and histopathology information from 55 women, aged ≥30 years, who had dense breasts (Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System [BI-RADS] breast density categories C and D) and an abnormal mammogram. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated for mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), synthetic mammography (SM) derived from DBT, ultrasound, and abbreviated breast MRI (ABMRI).

Results: A total of 19 women had pathology-proven breast cancer. Among all methods, ABMRI showed the highest sensitivity (94.7%) and specificity (58.3%), while mammography showed the lowest (84.2% and 44.4%, respectively). AUC for ABMRI was higher than all the methods including mammography (0.751 vs. 0.643; P < 0.05).

Conclusion: ABMRI appears to be more accurate in cancer diagnosis than mammography and other modalities for women with dense breast tissue. Further research is advised on a larger sample of Saudi women to confirm the benefit of ABMRI in breast cancer screening and diagnosis for women with increased breast density.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Saudi Journal of Medicine & Medical Sciences
Saudi Journal of Medicine & Medical Sciences MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Saudi Journal of Medicine & Medical Sciences (SJMMS) is the official scientific journal of Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University. It is an international peer-reviewed, general medical journal. The scope of the Journal is to publish research that will be of interest to health specialties both in academic and clinical practice. The Journal aims at disseminating high-powered research results with the objective of turning research into knowledge. It seeks to promote scholarly publishing in medicine and medical sciences. The Journal is published in print and online. The target readers of the Journal include all medical and health professionals in the health cluster such as in medicine, dentistry, nursing, applied medical sciences, clinical pharmacology, public health, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信