眼动追踪作为检测唐氏综合症患者阿尔茨海默病的工具。

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Brianna Piro-Gambetti, Sharon Krinsky-McHale, Cynthia Kovacs, Benjamin Handen, Bradley Christian, Charles M. Laymon, Davneet Minhas, Weiquan Luo, Dasoo Milton Yoon, Victoria L. Fleming, Emily Schworer, Heather Kirkorian, Sigan L. Hartley, Alzheimer Biomarkers Consortium-Down Syndrome
{"title":"眼动追踪作为检测唐氏综合症患者阿尔茨海默病的工具。","authors":"Brianna Piro-Gambetti,&nbsp;Sharon Krinsky-McHale,&nbsp;Cynthia Kovacs,&nbsp;Benjamin Handen,&nbsp;Bradley Christian,&nbsp;Charles M. Laymon,&nbsp;Davneet Minhas,&nbsp;Weiquan Luo,&nbsp;Dasoo Milton Yoon,&nbsp;Victoria L. Fleming,&nbsp;Emily Schworer,&nbsp;Heather Kirkorian,&nbsp;Sigan L. Hartley,&nbsp;Alzheimer Biomarkers Consortium-Down Syndrome","doi":"10.1111/jir.13214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Adults with Down syndrome (DS) experience an increased risk of Alzheimer's disease (<span>AD</span>). Valid cognitive assessments for adults with DS with severe/profound intellectual disability (ID) are needed. It is unclear whether eye tracking is feasible for detecting <span>AD</span> in DS.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Fifty-three adults with DS completed a visual paired comparison (VPC) task, a battery of cognitive measures, and underwent PET scanning. Study partners reported on the participant's dementia symptoms. Bivariate correlations assessed associations between eye-tracking metrics and <span>AD</span>-related pathology and symptomatology. Analyses included the full sample (<i>n</i> = 53) and a subgroup with an IQ ≤ 45 (<i>n</i> = 33).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Greater fixation duration during the habituation phase was associated with better cognitive performance on the Modified Cued Recall Test (mCRT) (intrusions: <i>r</i> = −0.39, <i>p</i> = 0.011) and less PET tau (<i>r</i> = −0.47, <i>p</i> = 0.014). Larger saccadic amplitudes during the test phase were associated with younger age (<i>r</i> = −0.45, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), better cognitive performance on the mCRT (total: <i>r</i> = 0.31, <i>p</i> = 0.041; intrusions: <i>r</i> = −0.33, <i>p</i> = 0.032) and less PET Aβ (<i>r</i> = −0.40, <i>p</i> = 0.025). Greater preference to fixate on the novel image was associated with fewer dementia symptoms (count: <i>r</i> = −0.44, <i>p</i> = 0.002; duration: <i>r</i> = −0.38, <i>p</i> = 0.009). This pattern of significance remained for the subgroup with lower IQ scores.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The VPC task is a potentially useful method for assessing <span>AD</span>-related cognitive impairments in adults with DS across varying ID levels.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16163,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","volume":"69 5","pages":"370-382"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jir.13214","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eye Tracking as a Tool for Detecting Alzheimer's Disease in People With Down Syndrome\",\"authors\":\"Brianna Piro-Gambetti,&nbsp;Sharon Krinsky-McHale,&nbsp;Cynthia Kovacs,&nbsp;Benjamin Handen,&nbsp;Bradley Christian,&nbsp;Charles M. Laymon,&nbsp;Davneet Minhas,&nbsp;Weiquan Luo,&nbsp;Dasoo Milton Yoon,&nbsp;Victoria L. Fleming,&nbsp;Emily Schworer,&nbsp;Heather Kirkorian,&nbsp;Sigan L. Hartley,&nbsp;Alzheimer Biomarkers Consortium-Down Syndrome\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jir.13214\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Adults with Down syndrome (DS) experience an increased risk of Alzheimer's disease (<span>AD</span>). Valid cognitive assessments for adults with DS with severe/profound intellectual disability (ID) are needed. It is unclear whether eye tracking is feasible for detecting <span>AD</span> in DS.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>Fifty-three adults with DS completed a visual paired comparison (VPC) task, a battery of cognitive measures, and underwent PET scanning. Study partners reported on the participant's dementia symptoms. Bivariate correlations assessed associations between eye-tracking metrics and <span>AD</span>-related pathology and symptomatology. Analyses included the full sample (<i>n</i> = 53) and a subgroup with an IQ ≤ 45 (<i>n</i> = 33).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Greater fixation duration during the habituation phase was associated with better cognitive performance on the Modified Cued Recall Test (mCRT) (intrusions: <i>r</i> = −0.39, <i>p</i> = 0.011) and less PET tau (<i>r</i> = −0.47, <i>p</i> = 0.014). Larger saccadic amplitudes during the test phase were associated with younger age (<i>r</i> = −0.45, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), better cognitive performance on the mCRT (total: <i>r</i> = 0.31, <i>p</i> = 0.041; intrusions: <i>r</i> = −0.33, <i>p</i> = 0.032) and less PET Aβ (<i>r</i> = −0.40, <i>p</i> = 0.025). Greater preference to fixate on the novel image was associated with fewer dementia symptoms (count: <i>r</i> = −0.44, <i>p</i> = 0.002; duration: <i>r</i> = −0.38, <i>p</i> = 0.009). This pattern of significance remained for the subgroup with lower IQ scores.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The VPC task is a potentially useful method for assessing <span>AD</span>-related cognitive impairments in adults with DS across varying ID levels.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research\",\"volume\":\"69 5\",\"pages\":\"370-382\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jir.13214\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jir.13214\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jir.13214","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:患有唐氏综合症(DS)的成年人患阿尔茨海默病(AD)的风险增加。需要对伴有严重/深度智力残疾(ID)的成人退行性痴呆患者进行有效的认知评估。目前尚不清楚眼动追踪在DS中检测AD是否可行。方法:53名成人DS患者完成了视觉配对比较(VPC)任务,一系列认知测量,并进行了PET扫描。研究伙伴报告了参与者的痴呆症状。双变量相关性评估眼动追踪指标与ad相关病理和症状之间的关联。分析包括全部样本(n = 53)和IQ≤45的亚组(n = 33)。结果:习惯化阶段注视时间越长,修正提示回忆测试(mCRT)的认知表现越好(干扰:r = -0.39, p = 0.011), PET tau越少(r = -0.47, p = 0.014)。结论:VPC任务是评估不同ID水平成人DS患者ad相关认知障碍的一种潜在有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Eye Tracking as a Tool for Detecting Alzheimer's Disease in People With Down Syndrome

Eye Tracking as a Tool for Detecting Alzheimer's Disease in People With Down Syndrome

Background

Adults with Down syndrome (DS) experience an increased risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Valid cognitive assessments for adults with DS with severe/profound intellectual disability (ID) are needed. It is unclear whether eye tracking is feasible for detecting AD in DS.

Method

Fifty-three adults with DS completed a visual paired comparison (VPC) task, a battery of cognitive measures, and underwent PET scanning. Study partners reported on the participant's dementia symptoms. Bivariate correlations assessed associations between eye-tracking metrics and AD-related pathology and symptomatology. Analyses included the full sample (n = 53) and a subgroup with an IQ ≤ 45 (n = 33).

Results

Greater fixation duration during the habituation phase was associated with better cognitive performance on the Modified Cued Recall Test (mCRT) (intrusions: r = −0.39, p = 0.011) and less PET tau (r = −0.47, p = 0.014). Larger saccadic amplitudes during the test phase were associated with younger age (r = −0.45, p < 0.001), better cognitive performance on the mCRT (total: r = 0.31, p = 0.041; intrusions: r = −0.33, p = 0.032) and less PET Aβ (r = −0.40, p = 0.025). Greater preference to fixate on the novel image was associated with fewer dementia symptoms (count: r = −0.44, p = 0.002; duration: r = −0.38, p = 0.009). This pattern of significance remained for the subgroup with lower IQ scores.

Conclusion

The VPC task is a potentially useful method for assessing AD-related cognitive impairments in adults with DS across varying ID levels.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: The Journal of Intellectual Disability Research is devoted exclusively to the scientific study of intellectual disability and publishes papers reporting original observations in this field. The subject matter is broad and includes, but is not restricted to, findings from biological, educational, genetic, medical, psychiatric, psychological and sociological studies, and ethical, philosophical, and legal contributions that increase knowledge on the treatment and prevention of intellectual disability and of associated impairments and disabilities, and/or inform public policy and practice. Expert reviews on themes in which recent research has produced notable advances will be included. Such reviews will normally be by invitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信