移民是否扩大了城乡之间的死亡率不平等?挪威农村滞留者、农村移民、城市移民和返回者的长期死亡风险

IF 2.6 2区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY
Monika Dybdahl Jakobsen, Knut Fylkesnes, Tonje Braaten
{"title":"移民是否扩大了城乡之间的死亡率不平等?挪威农村滞留者、农村移民、城市移民和返回者的长期死亡风险","authors":"Monika Dybdahl Jakobsen,&nbsp;Knut Fylkesnes,&nbsp;Tonje Braaten","doi":"10.1002/psp.70013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>In many countries, the main internal migration trend has been from rural to urban areas. However, there is little knowledge of whether internal migration from rural to urban areas contributes to widening geographical inequalities in health and survival. In the present study, we investigated differences in long-term mortality risk among stayers (individuals who did not move from their rural municipality), rural migrants (individuals who moved to other rural municipalities), urban migrants (individuals who moved to urban municipalities), and returners (individuals who first moved to urban municipalities and then returned to rural municipalities). Data from a population-based survey carried out among adults in Finnmark aged 30–62 years in 1987/88 was linked to the National Population Register and the Norwegian Cause of Death Registry to identify migration and deaths from recruitment to the health survey up to December 2017. Flexible parametric survival models were used to examine the age-varying associations between different migration careers and mortality. For both men and women, the estimated mortality risk was lower for all internal migrant groups when compared to stayers. However, for men, the findings only applied to ages under 85 years for rural migrants, 81 years for urban migrants, and 71 years for returners, while for women, the findings applied to ages under 75 years for rural migrants, 78 years for urban migrants, and the age range 46–86 years for returners. The lower mortality risk observed among migrants contributes to widening health inequalities between rural depopulation areas and areas with increasing populations. Migrants to rural areas may limit this effect.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48067,"journal":{"name":"Population Space and Place","volume":"31 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Migration Widen Mortality Inequalities Between Rural and Urban Areas? Long-Term Mortality Risk Among Rural Stayers, Rural Migrants, Urban Migrants, and Returners in Norway\",\"authors\":\"Monika Dybdahl Jakobsen,&nbsp;Knut Fylkesnes,&nbsp;Tonje Braaten\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/psp.70013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>In many countries, the main internal migration trend has been from rural to urban areas. However, there is little knowledge of whether internal migration from rural to urban areas contributes to widening geographical inequalities in health and survival. In the present study, we investigated differences in long-term mortality risk among stayers (individuals who did not move from their rural municipality), rural migrants (individuals who moved to other rural municipalities), urban migrants (individuals who moved to urban municipalities), and returners (individuals who first moved to urban municipalities and then returned to rural municipalities). Data from a population-based survey carried out among adults in Finnmark aged 30–62 years in 1987/88 was linked to the National Population Register and the Norwegian Cause of Death Registry to identify migration and deaths from recruitment to the health survey up to December 2017. Flexible parametric survival models were used to examine the age-varying associations between different migration careers and mortality. For both men and women, the estimated mortality risk was lower for all internal migrant groups when compared to stayers. However, for men, the findings only applied to ages under 85 years for rural migrants, 81 years for urban migrants, and 71 years for returners, while for women, the findings applied to ages under 75 years for rural migrants, 78 years for urban migrants, and the age range 46–86 years for returners. The lower mortality risk observed among migrants contributes to widening health inequalities between rural depopulation areas and areas with increasing populations. Migrants to rural areas may limit this effect.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Population Space and Place\",\"volume\":\"31 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Population Space and Place\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/psp.70013\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DEMOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Space and Place","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/psp.70013","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在许多国家,主要的国内移徙趋势是从农村到城市地区。然而,对于从农村到城市地区的内部移徙是否会加剧健康和生存方面的地域不平等,人们知之甚少。在本研究中,我们调查了停留者(未从农村城市迁移的个体)、农村移民(迁移到其他农村城市的个体)、城市移民(迁移到城市城市的个体)和回归者(首先迁移到城市城市然后返回农村城市的个体)之间长期死亡风险的差异。1987/88年在芬兰30-62岁的成年人中进行的一项基于人口的调查数据与国家人口登记册和挪威死亡原因登记册相关联,以确定从招募到截至2017年12月的健康调查的迁移和死亡情况。使用灵活的参数生存模型来检验不同迁移职业与死亡率之间随年龄变化的关联。就男性和女性而言,与滞留者相比,所有内部移民群体的估计死亡风险都较低。然而,对于男性,研究结果仅适用于年龄在85岁以下的农村流动人口、81岁以下的城市流动人口和71岁以下的返乡人口;而对于女性,研究结果适用于年龄在75岁以下的农村流动人口、78岁以下的城市流动人口和46-86岁的返乡人口。移徙者死亡风险较低,这加剧了农村人口减少地区与人口增加地区之间的健康不平等。向农村地区的移民可能会限制这种影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does Migration Widen Mortality Inequalities Between Rural and Urban Areas? Long-Term Mortality Risk Among Rural Stayers, Rural Migrants, Urban Migrants, and Returners in Norway

In many countries, the main internal migration trend has been from rural to urban areas. However, there is little knowledge of whether internal migration from rural to urban areas contributes to widening geographical inequalities in health and survival. In the present study, we investigated differences in long-term mortality risk among stayers (individuals who did not move from their rural municipality), rural migrants (individuals who moved to other rural municipalities), urban migrants (individuals who moved to urban municipalities), and returners (individuals who first moved to urban municipalities and then returned to rural municipalities). Data from a population-based survey carried out among adults in Finnmark aged 30–62 years in 1987/88 was linked to the National Population Register and the Norwegian Cause of Death Registry to identify migration and deaths from recruitment to the health survey up to December 2017. Flexible parametric survival models were used to examine the age-varying associations between different migration careers and mortality. For both men and women, the estimated mortality risk was lower for all internal migrant groups when compared to stayers. However, for men, the findings only applied to ages under 85 years for rural migrants, 81 years for urban migrants, and 71 years for returners, while for women, the findings applied to ages under 75 years for rural migrants, 78 years for urban migrants, and the age range 46–86 years for returners. The lower mortality risk observed among migrants contributes to widening health inequalities between rural depopulation areas and areas with increasing populations. Migrants to rural areas may limit this effect.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Population, Space and Place aims to be the leading English-language research journal in the field of geographical population studies. It intends to: - Inform population researchers of the best theoretical and empirical research on topics related to population, space and place - Promote and further enhance the international standing of population research through the exchange of views on what constitutes best research practice - Facilitate debate on issues of policy relevance and encourage the widest possible discussion and dissemination of the applications of research on populations - Review and evaluate the significance of recent research findings and provide an international platform where researchers can discuss the future course of population research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信