农场保存鹰嘴豆(Cicer arietinum L.)评价埃塞俄比亚中部的种子质量

Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Legume Science Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1002/leg3.70020
Abebe Sori, Zewdie Bishaw, Asnake Fikre, Mashilla Dejene, Karta Kaske
{"title":"农场保存鹰嘴豆(Cicer arietinum L.)评价埃塞俄比亚中部的种子质量","authors":"Abebe Sori,&nbsp;Zewdie Bishaw,&nbsp;Asnake Fikre,&nbsp;Mashilla Dejene,&nbsp;Karta Kaske","doi":"10.1002/leg3.70020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Limited information exists on the impact of current seed storage methods on seed quality in Central Ethiopia. The study aimed to assess the extent of the decline in seed quality of on-farm stored chickpeas. Two hundred two farmers were identified using a multistage and purposive technique, and seed samples were collected from five districts. Two rounds of on-farm seed samples were collected at early storage in March and at planting time in September 2022. Seed quality tests, including physical purity, physiological quality, and seed health were conducted using standard laboratory techniques for the seed samples. In Round 1, the results showed that mean physical purity, seed moisture (SM, %), and seed germination (SG, %) were 94.9%, 10.7%, and 83.8%, respectively. Moreover, about 95.5% and 81.8% of the seed samples satisfied the certified seed class D standards for SM and SG, respectively. However, for Round 2, the samples met the certified seed class D standard for SM and standard SG dropped to 36.9% and 63.1%, respectively. In Round 1, seed infection varied between 12% and 80%, whereas in Round 2, seed infection varied between 25% and 100%. During both rounds of seed sampling, no seed sample fulfilled the standard for certified seed class D specified for chickpea seed infection (%). Overall, seed quality was considerably lower during planting time compared to early storage. The study showed challenges in maintaining seed quality using current seed production, seed storage, and management practices indicating a need to improve seed production, processing, and handling practices to enhance farm-level chickpea seed quality and productivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":17929,"journal":{"name":"Legume Science","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/leg3.70020","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of On-Farm Saved Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Seed Quality in Central Ethiopia\",\"authors\":\"Abebe Sori,&nbsp;Zewdie Bishaw,&nbsp;Asnake Fikre,&nbsp;Mashilla Dejene,&nbsp;Karta Kaske\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/leg3.70020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Limited information exists on the impact of current seed storage methods on seed quality in Central Ethiopia. The study aimed to assess the extent of the decline in seed quality of on-farm stored chickpeas. Two hundred two farmers were identified using a multistage and purposive technique, and seed samples were collected from five districts. Two rounds of on-farm seed samples were collected at early storage in March and at planting time in September 2022. Seed quality tests, including physical purity, physiological quality, and seed health were conducted using standard laboratory techniques for the seed samples. In Round 1, the results showed that mean physical purity, seed moisture (SM, %), and seed germination (SG, %) were 94.9%, 10.7%, and 83.8%, respectively. Moreover, about 95.5% and 81.8% of the seed samples satisfied the certified seed class D standards for SM and SG, respectively. However, for Round 2, the samples met the certified seed class D standard for SM and standard SG dropped to 36.9% and 63.1%, respectively. In Round 1, seed infection varied between 12% and 80%, whereas in Round 2, seed infection varied between 25% and 100%. During both rounds of seed sampling, no seed sample fulfilled the standard for certified seed class D specified for chickpea seed infection (%). Overall, seed quality was considerably lower during planting time compared to early storage. The study showed challenges in maintaining seed quality using current seed production, seed storage, and management practices indicating a need to improve seed production, processing, and handling practices to enhance farm-level chickpea seed quality and productivity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Legume Science\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/leg3.70020\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Legume Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leg3.70020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legume Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leg3.70020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于埃塞俄比亚中部目前种子储存方法对种子质量影响的信息有限。该研究旨在评估农场储存鹰嘴豆种子质量下降的程度。采用多阶段和有目的技术对222名农民进行了鉴定,并从5个地区收集了种子样本。在2022年3月的早期储存和9月的播种期间采集了两轮农场种子样本。种子质量测试,包括物理纯度、生理质量和种子健康使用标准的实验室技术对种子样品进行。在第一轮中,结果表明,平均物理纯度、种子含水量(SM, %)和种子萌发率(SG, %)分别为94.9%、10.7%和83.8%。此外,95.5%和81.8%的种子样品分别满足SM和SG种子D类认证标准。而在第2轮中,SM和SG的D类合格率分别下降到36.9%和63.1%。在第1轮中,种子感染率在12%到80%之间变化,而在第2轮中,种子感染率在25%到100%之间变化。在两轮种子取样中,没有种子样本符合鹰嘴豆种子感染的认证种子D类标准(%)。总体而言,播种期的种子质量明显低于贮藏期。该研究表明,利用当前的种子生产、种子储存和管理实践,保持种子质量存在挑战,表明需要改进种子生产、加工和处理实践,以提高农场级鹰嘴豆种子质量和生产力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Assessment of On-Farm Saved Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Seed Quality in Central Ethiopia

Assessment of On-Farm Saved Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Seed Quality in Central Ethiopia

Limited information exists on the impact of current seed storage methods on seed quality in Central Ethiopia. The study aimed to assess the extent of the decline in seed quality of on-farm stored chickpeas. Two hundred two farmers were identified using a multistage and purposive technique, and seed samples were collected from five districts. Two rounds of on-farm seed samples were collected at early storage in March and at planting time in September 2022. Seed quality tests, including physical purity, physiological quality, and seed health were conducted using standard laboratory techniques for the seed samples. In Round 1, the results showed that mean physical purity, seed moisture (SM, %), and seed germination (SG, %) were 94.9%, 10.7%, and 83.8%, respectively. Moreover, about 95.5% and 81.8% of the seed samples satisfied the certified seed class D standards for SM and SG, respectively. However, for Round 2, the samples met the certified seed class D standard for SM and standard SG dropped to 36.9% and 63.1%, respectively. In Round 1, seed infection varied between 12% and 80%, whereas in Round 2, seed infection varied between 25% and 100%. During both rounds of seed sampling, no seed sample fulfilled the standard for certified seed class D specified for chickpea seed infection (%). Overall, seed quality was considerably lower during planting time compared to early storage. The study showed challenges in maintaining seed quality using current seed production, seed storage, and management practices indicating a need to improve seed production, processing, and handling practices to enhance farm-level chickpea seed quality and productivity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Legume Science
Legume Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Plant Science
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信