与利益相关者沟通,确定非目标分析的高影响力研究方向

IF 6.7 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Sara L. Nason*, James McCord*, Yong-Lai Feng, Jon R. Sobus, Christine M. Fisher, Ruth Marfil-Vega, Allison L. Phillips, Gregory Johnson, John Sloop, Stéphane Bayen, Esra Mutlu, Angela L. Batt and Keaton Nahan, 
{"title":"与利益相关者沟通,确定非目标分析的高影响力研究方向","authors":"Sara L. Nason*,&nbsp;James McCord*,&nbsp;Yong-Lai Feng,&nbsp;Jon R. Sobus,&nbsp;Christine M. Fisher,&nbsp;Ruth Marfil-Vega,&nbsp;Allison L. Phillips,&nbsp;Gregory Johnson,&nbsp;John Sloop,&nbsp;Stéphane Bayen,&nbsp;Esra Mutlu,&nbsp;Angela L. Batt and Keaton Nahan,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.analchem.4c0480110.1021/acs.analchem.4c04801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Non-targeted analysis (NTA) using high-resolution mass spectrometry without defined chemical targets has the potential to expand and improve chemical monitoring in many fields. Despite rapid advancements within the research community, NTA methods and data remain underutilized by many potential beneficiaries. To better understand barriers toward widespread adoption, the Best Practices for Non-Targeted Analysis (BP4NTA) working group conducted focus group meetings and follow-up surveys with scientists (n = 61) from various sectors (e.g., drinking water utilities, epidemiologists, n = 9) where NTA is expected to provide future value. Meeting participants included producers and end-users of NTA data with a wide range of familiarity with NTA methods and outputs. Discussions focused on identifying specific barriers that limit adoption and on setting NTA product development priorities. Stated priorities fell into four major categories: 1) education and training materials; 2) QA/QC frameworks and study design guidance; 3) accessible compound databases and libraries; and 4) NTA data linkages with chemical fate and toxicity information. Based on participant feedback, this manuscript proposes research directions, such as standardization of training materials, that BP4NTA and other institutions can pursue to expand NTA use in various application scenarios and decision contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":27,"journal":{"name":"Analytical Chemistry","volume":"97 5","pages":"2567–2578 2567–2578"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Communicating with Stakeholders to Identify High-Impact Research Directions for Non-Targeted Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Sara L. Nason*,&nbsp;James McCord*,&nbsp;Yong-Lai Feng,&nbsp;Jon R. Sobus,&nbsp;Christine M. Fisher,&nbsp;Ruth Marfil-Vega,&nbsp;Allison L. Phillips,&nbsp;Gregory Johnson,&nbsp;John Sloop,&nbsp;Stéphane Bayen,&nbsp;Esra Mutlu,&nbsp;Angela L. Batt and Keaton Nahan,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.analchem.4c0480110.1021/acs.analchem.4c04801\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Non-targeted analysis (NTA) using high-resolution mass spectrometry without defined chemical targets has the potential to expand and improve chemical monitoring in many fields. Despite rapid advancements within the research community, NTA methods and data remain underutilized by many potential beneficiaries. To better understand barriers toward widespread adoption, the Best Practices for Non-Targeted Analysis (BP4NTA) working group conducted focus group meetings and follow-up surveys with scientists (n = 61) from various sectors (e.g., drinking water utilities, epidemiologists, n = 9) where NTA is expected to provide future value. Meeting participants included producers and end-users of NTA data with a wide range of familiarity with NTA methods and outputs. Discussions focused on identifying specific barriers that limit adoption and on setting NTA product development priorities. Stated priorities fell into four major categories: 1) education and training materials; 2) QA/QC frameworks and study design guidance; 3) accessible compound databases and libraries; and 4) NTA data linkages with chemical fate and toxicity information. Based on participant feedback, this manuscript proposes research directions, such as standardization of training materials, that BP4NTA and other institutions can pursue to expand NTA use in various application scenarios and decision contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":27,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analytical Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"97 5\",\"pages\":\"2567–2578 2567–2578\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analytical Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.analchem.4c04801\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.analchem.4c04801","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

非靶向分析(NTA)采用高分辨率质谱法,没有明确的化学目标,有可能扩大和改善许多领域的化学监测。尽管研究界取得了快速进展,但NTA方法和数据仍未被许多潜在受益者充分利用。为了更好地了解广泛采用的障碍,非目标分析最佳实践(BP4NTA)工作组与来自不同部门(例如,饮用水公用事业,流行病学家,n = 9)的科学家(n = 61)进行了焦点小组会议和后续调查,NTA有望在未来提供价值。与会者包括对国家评价方法和产出非常熟悉的国家评价数据的生产者和最终用户。讨论的重点是确定限制采用的具体障碍和确定NTA产品开发优先级。声明的优先事项分为四大类:1)教育和培训材料;2) QA/QC框架和研究设计指导;3)可访问的复合数据库和库;4) NTA数据与化学命运和毒性信息的联系。根据参与者的反馈,本文提出了BP4NTA和其他机构可以追求的研究方向,如培训材料的标准化,以扩大NTA在各种应用场景和决策背景下的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Communicating with Stakeholders to Identify High-Impact Research Directions for Non-Targeted Analysis

Communicating with Stakeholders to Identify High-Impact Research Directions for Non-Targeted Analysis

Non-targeted analysis (NTA) using high-resolution mass spectrometry without defined chemical targets has the potential to expand and improve chemical monitoring in many fields. Despite rapid advancements within the research community, NTA methods and data remain underutilized by many potential beneficiaries. To better understand barriers toward widespread adoption, the Best Practices for Non-Targeted Analysis (BP4NTA) working group conducted focus group meetings and follow-up surveys with scientists (n = 61) from various sectors (e.g., drinking water utilities, epidemiologists, n = 9) where NTA is expected to provide future value. Meeting participants included producers and end-users of NTA data with a wide range of familiarity with NTA methods and outputs. Discussions focused on identifying specific barriers that limit adoption and on setting NTA product development priorities. Stated priorities fell into four major categories: 1) education and training materials; 2) QA/QC frameworks and study design guidance; 3) accessible compound databases and libraries; and 4) NTA data linkages with chemical fate and toxicity information. Based on participant feedback, this manuscript proposes research directions, such as standardization of training materials, that BP4NTA and other institutions can pursue to expand NTA use in various application scenarios and decision contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Analytical Chemistry
Analytical Chemistry 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
12.20%
发文量
1949
审稿时长
1.4 months
期刊介绍: Analytical Chemistry, a peer-reviewed research journal, focuses on disseminating new and original knowledge across all branches of analytical chemistry. Fundamental articles may explore general principles of chemical measurement science and need not directly address existing or potential analytical methodology. They can be entirely theoretical or report experimental results. Contributions may cover various phases of analytical operations, including sampling, bioanalysis, electrochemistry, mass spectrometry, microscale and nanoscale systems, environmental analysis, separations, spectroscopy, chemical reactions and selectivity, instrumentation, imaging, surface analysis, and data processing. Papers discussing known analytical methods should present a significant, original application of the method, a notable improvement, or results on an important analyte.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信