精神分裂症和双相情感障碍的主观认知:使用一种新的主观认知测量方法调查群体差异及其与客观认知和临床特征的关联

IF 2.3 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Kristoffer Grimstad , Håkon Sørensen , Anja Vaskinn , Christine Mohn , Stine Holmstul Olsen , Ole A. Andreassen , Trine Vik Lagerberg , Ingrid Melle , Merete Glenne Øie , Torill Ueland , Beathe Haatveit
{"title":"精神分裂症和双相情感障碍的主观认知:使用一种新的主观认知测量方法调查群体差异及其与客观认知和临床特征的关联","authors":"Kristoffer Grimstad ,&nbsp;Håkon Sørensen ,&nbsp;Anja Vaskinn ,&nbsp;Christine Mohn ,&nbsp;Stine Holmstul Olsen ,&nbsp;Ole A. Andreassen ,&nbsp;Trine Vik Lagerberg ,&nbsp;Ingrid Melle ,&nbsp;Merete Glenne Øie ,&nbsp;Torill Ueland ,&nbsp;Beathe Haatveit","doi":"10.1016/j.scog.2025.100345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cognitive dysfunction is a well-documented feature of schizophrenia (SZ) and bipolar (BD) disorder. The person's subjective experience of cognitive difficulties is less investigated. Here we investigated subjective cognition in SZ and BD compared to healthy controls (HC).</div><div>Subjective and objective cognition were assessed in 91 SZ participants, 55 BD participants and 55 HC, applying a novel measure of subjective cognition, the self-assessed cognitive complaints scale (SACCS) and a clinically relevant neuropsychological test battery. The psychometric properties of SACCS were investigated. The relationship between subjective and objective cognition, and subjective cognition and clinical variables were explored in SZ and BD.</div><div>The SACCS showed adequate psychometric properties. Clinical groups reported significantly more cognitive complaints than HCs, without differences between SZ and BD. There were no significant associations between subjective and objective cognitive measures. There was a small trend association between subjective cognition and insight in SZ participants, and moderate sized associations between subjective cognition and general psychopathology and functioning in BD participants.</div><div>Although SZ participants are more cognitively impaired than BD participants, the two groups report similar levels of subjective cognitive complaints, with no association between subjective and objective cognition. Our results suggest that the expression of subjective cognition is associated with different clinical factors in SZ and BD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38119,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article 100345"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subjective cognition in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: Investigation of group differences and associations with objective cognition and clinical characteristics using a novel measure of subjective cognition\",\"authors\":\"Kristoffer Grimstad ,&nbsp;Håkon Sørensen ,&nbsp;Anja Vaskinn ,&nbsp;Christine Mohn ,&nbsp;Stine Holmstul Olsen ,&nbsp;Ole A. Andreassen ,&nbsp;Trine Vik Lagerberg ,&nbsp;Ingrid Melle ,&nbsp;Merete Glenne Øie ,&nbsp;Torill Ueland ,&nbsp;Beathe Haatveit\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.scog.2025.100345\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Cognitive dysfunction is a well-documented feature of schizophrenia (SZ) and bipolar (BD) disorder. The person's subjective experience of cognitive difficulties is less investigated. Here we investigated subjective cognition in SZ and BD compared to healthy controls (HC).</div><div>Subjective and objective cognition were assessed in 91 SZ participants, 55 BD participants and 55 HC, applying a novel measure of subjective cognition, the self-assessed cognitive complaints scale (SACCS) and a clinically relevant neuropsychological test battery. The psychometric properties of SACCS were investigated. The relationship between subjective and objective cognition, and subjective cognition and clinical variables were explored in SZ and BD.</div><div>The SACCS showed adequate psychometric properties. Clinical groups reported significantly more cognitive complaints than HCs, without differences between SZ and BD. There were no significant associations between subjective and objective cognitive measures. There was a small trend association between subjective cognition and insight in SZ participants, and moderate sized associations between subjective cognition and general psychopathology and functioning in BD participants.</div><div>Although SZ participants are more cognitively impaired than BD participants, the two groups report similar levels of subjective cognitive complaints, with no association between subjective and objective cognition. Our results suggest that the expression of subjective cognition is associated with different clinical factors in SZ and BD.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition\",\"volume\":\"40 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100345\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215001325000022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215001325000022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

认知功能障碍是精神分裂症(SZ)和双相情感障碍(BD)的一个充分证明的特征。人们对认知困难的主观体验的研究较少。在这里,我们调查了SZ和BD患者的主观认知,并与健康对照组(HC)进行了比较。采用一种新的主观认知测量方法——自评认知抱怨量表(SACCS)和一组临床相关的神经心理学测试,对91名SZ参与者、55名BD参与者和55名HC参与者的主观和客观认知进行了评估。研究了sacs的心理测量特性。探讨了SZ和bd的主观认知与客观认知、主观认知与临床变量的关系。临床组报告的认知抱怨明显多于hc,而SZ和BD之间没有差异。主观和客观认知测量之间没有显着关联。SZ参与者的主观认知与洞察力之间存在较小的趋势相关性,而BD参与者的主观认知与一般精神病理和功能之间存在中等程度的相关性。虽然SZ参与者比BD参与者认知受损更严重,但两组报告的主观认知抱怨水平相似,主观和客观认知之间没有关联。我们的研究结果提示,主观认知的表达与SZ和BD的不同临床因素有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Subjective cognition in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: Investigation of group differences and associations with objective cognition and clinical characteristics using a novel measure of subjective cognition
Cognitive dysfunction is a well-documented feature of schizophrenia (SZ) and bipolar (BD) disorder. The person's subjective experience of cognitive difficulties is less investigated. Here we investigated subjective cognition in SZ and BD compared to healthy controls (HC).
Subjective and objective cognition were assessed in 91 SZ participants, 55 BD participants and 55 HC, applying a novel measure of subjective cognition, the self-assessed cognitive complaints scale (SACCS) and a clinically relevant neuropsychological test battery. The psychometric properties of SACCS were investigated. The relationship between subjective and objective cognition, and subjective cognition and clinical variables were explored in SZ and BD.
The SACCS showed adequate psychometric properties. Clinical groups reported significantly more cognitive complaints than HCs, without differences between SZ and BD. There were no significant associations between subjective and objective cognitive measures. There was a small trend association between subjective cognition and insight in SZ participants, and moderate sized associations between subjective cognition and general psychopathology and functioning in BD participants.
Although SZ participants are more cognitively impaired than BD participants, the two groups report similar levels of subjective cognitive complaints, with no association between subjective and objective cognition. Our results suggest that the expression of subjective cognition is associated with different clinical factors in SZ and BD.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.70%
发文量
54
审稿时长
67 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信