Rebecca A. Stone , Paul Christiansen , Alexandra M. Johnstone , Adrian Brown , Flora Douglas , Charlotte A. Hardman , on behalf of the FIO-Food Team
{"title":"了解在英国为肥胖人群购买更健康、更环保的可持续食品的障碍,以及食物不安全的不同经历","authors":"Rebecca A. Stone , Paul Christiansen , Alexandra M. Johnstone , Adrian Brown , Flora Douglas , Charlotte A. Hardman , on behalf of the FIO-Food Team","doi":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In westernised countries, food insecurity (FI) is robustly associated with low diet quality, and obesity. Grocery stores are one promising arena for interventions to facilitate purchasing of healthier, more environmentally sustainable food. However, we currently lack understanding of the barriers experienced by people living with obesity (PLWO) and FI when shopping for such food. Using an online survey (N = 583), adults residing in England or Scotland with a body mass index of ≥ 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup> self-reported on FI, diet quality, and their experiences of shopping in a grocery store for healthy and environmentally sustainable food. Participants also ranked different grocery store interventions on their helpfulness in supporting healthier, more environmentally sustainable purchasing. Structural equation modelling revealed that greater experiences of FI were directly associated with greater experiences of barriers from the food environment (e.g., price), food preparation practices, lower healthy diet knowledge and physical ill-health. Moreover, greater experiences of FI were indirectly associated with lower diet quality via mental ill-health and greater experiences of anticipated stigma associated with being food insecure. Grocery store interventions based on price/ incentivisation were ranked most helpful in supporting healthier, more environmentally sustainable purchasing. These findings highlight the challenges faced by PLWO and with greater experiences of FI when shopping for healthy and environmentally sustainable food. Findings also underscore the need for policy development relating to price and affordability at a population-level, and for policymakers and healthcare professionals to consider how to address mental health and how to minimise anticipated stigma experienced by this vulnerable group.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":"131 ","pages":"Article 102798"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the barriers to purchasing healthier, more environmentally sustainable food for people living with obesity and varying experiences of food insecurity in the UK\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca A. Stone , Paul Christiansen , Alexandra M. Johnstone , Adrian Brown , Flora Douglas , Charlotte A. Hardman , on behalf of the FIO-Food Team\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102798\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In westernised countries, food insecurity (FI) is robustly associated with low diet quality, and obesity. Grocery stores are one promising arena for interventions to facilitate purchasing of healthier, more environmentally sustainable food. However, we currently lack understanding of the barriers experienced by people living with obesity (PLWO) and FI when shopping for such food. Using an online survey (N = 583), adults residing in England or Scotland with a body mass index of ≥ 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup> self-reported on FI, diet quality, and their experiences of shopping in a grocery store for healthy and environmentally sustainable food. Participants also ranked different grocery store interventions on their helpfulness in supporting healthier, more environmentally sustainable purchasing. Structural equation modelling revealed that greater experiences of FI were directly associated with greater experiences of barriers from the food environment (e.g., price), food preparation practices, lower healthy diet knowledge and physical ill-health. Moreover, greater experiences of FI were indirectly associated with lower diet quality via mental ill-health and greater experiences of anticipated stigma associated with being food insecure. Grocery store interventions based on price/ incentivisation were ranked most helpful in supporting healthier, more environmentally sustainable purchasing. These findings highlight the challenges faced by PLWO and with greater experiences of FI when shopping for healthy and environmentally sustainable food. Findings also underscore the need for policy development relating to price and affordability at a population-level, and for policymakers and healthcare professionals to consider how to address mental health and how to minimise anticipated stigma experienced by this vulnerable group.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Policy\",\"volume\":\"131 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102798\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919225000028\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Policy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919225000028","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Understanding the barriers to purchasing healthier, more environmentally sustainable food for people living with obesity and varying experiences of food insecurity in the UK
In westernised countries, food insecurity (FI) is robustly associated with low diet quality, and obesity. Grocery stores are one promising arena for interventions to facilitate purchasing of healthier, more environmentally sustainable food. However, we currently lack understanding of the barriers experienced by people living with obesity (PLWO) and FI when shopping for such food. Using an online survey (N = 583), adults residing in England or Scotland with a body mass index of ≥ 30 kg/m2 self-reported on FI, diet quality, and their experiences of shopping in a grocery store for healthy and environmentally sustainable food. Participants also ranked different grocery store interventions on their helpfulness in supporting healthier, more environmentally sustainable purchasing. Structural equation modelling revealed that greater experiences of FI were directly associated with greater experiences of barriers from the food environment (e.g., price), food preparation practices, lower healthy diet knowledge and physical ill-health. Moreover, greater experiences of FI were indirectly associated with lower diet quality via mental ill-health and greater experiences of anticipated stigma associated with being food insecure. Grocery store interventions based on price/ incentivisation were ranked most helpful in supporting healthier, more environmentally sustainable purchasing. These findings highlight the challenges faced by PLWO and with greater experiences of FI when shopping for healthy and environmentally sustainable food. Findings also underscore the need for policy development relating to price and affordability at a population-level, and for policymakers and healthcare professionals to consider how to address mental health and how to minimise anticipated stigma experienced by this vulnerable group.
期刊介绍:
Food Policy is a multidisciplinary journal publishing original research and novel evidence on issues in the formulation, implementation, and evaluation of policies for the food sector in developing, transition, and advanced economies.
Our main focus is on the economic and social aspect of food policy, and we prioritize empirical studies informing international food policy debates. Provided that articles make a clear and explicit contribution to food policy debates of international interest, we consider papers from any of the social sciences. Papers from other disciplines (e.g., law) will be considered only if they provide a key policy contribution, and are written in a style which is accessible to a social science readership.