{"title":"纤维和食管癌预防:微生物群有作用吗?","authors":"Gary D. Stoner","doi":"10.1002/efd2.141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Epidemiological studies suggest that dietary fiber may decrease the risk for development of colorectal cancer. There appear to be four mechanisms by which fiber is protective in the colon and rectum: (a) increasing bulk of the stool; (b) binding to colorectal carcinogens; (c) decreasing transit time of waste through the bowel; and (d) altering the microbial composition of the colon leading to reduced risk for colon cancer (Kritchevsky, <span>1997</span>; Zeng, <span>2014</span>). Both (b) and (c) reduce the interaction of carcinogens with the lining of the colon and rectum. Dietary fiber may also play a role in reducing risk for the development of esophageal cancer, perhaps through mechanisms that differ from those in colorectal cancer. Epidemiological studies have identified protective effects of fiber against the precancerous lesion, Barrett's esophagus (BE), and its conversion to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), presumably by reducing acid reflux from the stomach to the esophagus (Coleman et al., <span>2013</span>). Similar associations were observed in studies of fiber intake and risk of conversion of esophageal dysplasia to esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), but the results were not significant (Coleman et al., <span>2013</span>). However, a recent cross-sectional study in China found that subjects were at increased risk for ESCC when they consumed diets low in vegetables and fruit and this was attributed in part to low fiber intake (Zang et al., <span>2022</span>).</p><p>In any discussion of the role of fiber in disease occurrence, it is necessary to define what is meant by dietary “fiber.” Briefly, there are two types of dietary fiber, soluble and insoluble (Papandreou et al., <span>2015</span>). Both types are carbohydrates found in most plant foods. Soluble fiber (largely pectin and inulin) dissolves in water and is digested by enteric bacteria in the large intestine. Dietary sources of soluble fiber include oats, legumes, and vegetables such as carrots, cabbage, Brussels sprouts, squash, and broccoli. Soluble fiber reduces low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels in blood and helps control blood sugar by preventing rapid rises in blood sugar levels after a meal (Kritchevsky, <span>1997</span>). Insoluble fiber (cellulose, lignin) does not dissolve in water and passes directly through the gastrointestinal tract. Because it remains intact, it provides “bulk” with stool formation and speeds the movement of waste through the digestive system. Dietary sources of insoluble fiber include whole grains, rye, and fruits and vegetables. Bacterial degradation of fiber in the colon produces short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) such as butyric acid which may affect colonic and fecal pH. Butyric acid also exhibits both antiproliferative and proapoptotic activities (Vanamala et al., <span>2008</span>). Given these various functions of soluble and insoluble fiber, it seems readily apparent how fiber might reduce risk for colon cancer but not for esophageal cancer, especially given the rapid transit of dietary fiber through the esophagus and the observation that protective compounds such as butyric acid are produced mainly by bacteria in the intestine.</p><p>Extensive studies indicate that the microbial composition (microbiome) of the esophagus is linked to the development of several esophageal diseases including eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) (Harris et al., <span>2015</span>), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), BE and EAC (Gall et al., <span>2015</span>; Snider et al., <span>2018</span>; Yang et al., <span>2009</span>). Microbial analysis of secretions from the esophageal mucosa of 70 subjects with either EoE or GERD indicated that the bacterial load was increased in both EoE and GERD relative to mucosa from normal subjects (Harris et al., <span>2015</span>). <i>Haemophilus</i> was significantly increased in untreated EoE subjects as compared with normal subjects. <i>Streptocossus</i> was decreased in GERD subjects on protein pump inhibitors. In another study using biopsies of the distal esophagus obtained from 34 normal, EoE and BE patients, individuals with BE or EoE were more likely to harbor gram-negative anaerobic or microaerophilic organisms, such as <i>Haemophilus, Neisseria</i>, <i>Veillonella</i>, and <i>Prevotella</i> (Yang et al., <span>2009</span>). In contrast, healthy individuals were more likely to be dominated by <i>Streptococcus</i> species. Gall et al. reported that in a BE cohort, <i>Streptococcus</i> and <i>Prevotella</i> species dominated the upper gastrointestinal tract and the ratio of these two species was associated with waist-to-hip ratio and hiatal hernia length, two known EAC risk factors in BE patients (Gall et al., <span>2015</span>). A more recent study using saliva samples from 49 endoscopy patients without and without BE found that, at the phylum level, the oral microbiome in BE patients had significantly increased relative abundance of Firmicutes and decreased Proteobacteria (Snider et al., <span>2018</span>). At the genus level, a model including the relative abundance of <i>Lautropia, Streptococcus</i>, and a genus in the order of Bacteroidales distinguished BE from controls. The authors concluded that BE is associated with a distinct oral microbiome which may represent a potential screening marker for BE. Because BE is a precursor lesion for EAC, changes in the microbiome from normal to BE could well be important for the eventual development of EAC. The microbiome associated with EAC itself remains poorly described. Blackett et al. used 16S rRNA sequencing of prespecified bacterial species, comparing controls with patients with GERD, BE, and EAC (Blackett et al., <span>2013</span>). In many ways, the microbiome of EAC was more similar to the normal esophageal microbiome than to BE. Control and EAC samples had increased relative abundance of Bifidobacteria, <i>Bacteroides, Fusobacteria, Veillonella, Lactobacilli</i>, and <i>Staphylocossus</i> and decreased <i>Campylobacter</i> when compared to BE samples. Elliott et al. compared the microbiome of esophageal tissues from patients with BE and EAC and normal controls (Eliott et al., <span>2017</span>). They reported a decrease in microbial diversity in EAC tumor samples and increased relative abundance of <i>Lactobacillus fermentum</i>.</p><p>ESCC is the most prevalent esophageal cancer worldwide and about 50% of the cases occur in China. Numerous factors have been associated with development of the disease including poor nutritional status, low intake of fruits and vegetables, consumption of carcinogenic food products, drinking temperature hot beverages, tobacco and alcohol use, and other factors (Stoner & Gupta, <span>2001</span>). The precursor lesion for the development of ESCC is esophageal squamous dysplasia (ESD) and screening for the presence of dysplastic lesions is important for identifying individuals at risk for development of the disease. The microbiome of the esophagus in patients with ESD or ESCC has not been investigated as extensively as that in patients with BE or EAC. An early study in which a Human Oral Microbe Identification Microarray was used to test for the presence of 272 bacterial species in normal individuals and in patients with ESD indicated that the number of bacteria per sample was lower in ESD patients than in normal controls (Yu et al., <span>2014</span>). However, the specific bacterial types in the samples were not determined. Another study of 325 resected esophagus cancer specimens, of which 92% were ESCC, revealed increases in the quantity of <i>Fusobacterium nucleatum</i> in cancer specimens when compared to normal esophageal mucosa (Yamamura et al., <span>2016</span>). Moreover, the presence of <i>F</i>. nucleatum DNA in tumors was associated with shorter survival. These observations suggest that specific bacteria such as <i>F. nucleatum</i> may play a role in development of ESCC and its progression.</p><p>May and Abrams concluded in a recent review article (May & Abrams, <span>2018</span>) that the esophageal microbiome has a potentially important role in the development of esophageal EAC and ESCC, but our understanding of the role of specific bacteria in the pathogenesis of these diseases remains limited. They emphasized the need to conduct investigations directed toward modifying the bacterial composition of the esophageal microbiome and assessing effects of these modifications on disease occurrence and progression. This led Nobel et al. to test the hypothesis that dietary fiber may reduce risk for esophageal cancer by producing alterations in the esophageal microbiome (Nobel et al., <span>2018</span>). In their study, microbiome samples were collected from the squamous esophagus of 47 endoscopy patients who had completed a food frequency questionnaire quantifying fiber intake. The most abundant bacterial phyla among all samples were Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Fusobacteria. All other phyla had relative abundance <1%. At the genus level, <i>Streptococcus</i> was the most abundant bacterium. As indicated above, <i>Streptococcus</i> in the phylum Firmicutes is associated with a healthy, phenotypically normal esophagus. gram-negative bacteria comprised a mean of 49% of bacteria in the esophagus and as described above they are associated with an abnormal esophagus, including GERD and BE (Yang et al., <span>2009</span>). Samples from patients with a higher fiber intake had an increased abundance of <i>Streptococcus</i> and other members of the phylum Firmicutes and a decreased abundance of gram-negative bacteria. Low fiber intake was associated with increased abundance of several gram-negative bacteria, including <i>Prevotella, Neisseria</i>, and <i>Eikenella</i>. The authors concluded that the inverse association between dietary fiber and prevalence of gram-negative bacteria provides one mechanism by which increased fiber consumption might protect against inflammation-related esophageal diseases including GERD and BE. Interestingly, samples from only 10 of the 47 patients were found to contain bacteria that produce SCFA such as butyrate and the relative abundance of these bacteria in all positive samples was less than 1%. This suggests that the esophageal and intestinal microbiomes differ significantly in their ability to produce SCFA. Clearly, additional studies are required to further evaluate the effects of fiber on the composition of the esophageal microbiome and its role in the development of esophageal cancer.</p><p>Animal models of esophageal carcinogenesis could play an important role in assessing the effects of fiber and other dietary constituents on the esophageal microbiome and the development of esophageal cancer. A rat model of ESCC involves the induction of tumors following subcutaneous injection of rats with the carcinogen, N-nitrosomethylbenzylamine (NMBA) (Daniel & Stoner, <span>1991</span>). This model has been used extensively to evaluate the ability of multiple dietary factors including ellagic and cis-retinoic acids (Daniel & Stoner, <span>1991</span>), isothiocyanates (Stoner et al., <span>1991</span>), lyophilized black raspberries (Kresty et al., <span>2001</span>), anthocyanins (Wang et al., <span>2009</span>), green and black teas and green tea polyphenols (Morse et al., <span>1997</span>; Wang et al., <span>1995</span>), and others to reduce NMBA-induced esophageal tumor development when provided in a synthetic diet. Interestingly, the fiber constituent of black raspberries was nearly as chemopreventive as whole black raspberries in reducing NMBA-induced tumors in the rat esophagus (Wang et al., <span>2009</span>). However, it is not known whether the fiber produced changes in the bacterial composition of the esophageal microbiome. In addition, no attempts were made in this study to identify potentially bioactive components in the fiber such as pectin, cellulose and lignin to inhibit esophageal tumorigenesis and their potential effects on the esophageal microbiome.</p><p>In 1989, Pera et al. (<span>1989</span>) introduced the first rat surgical model of EAC by inducing chronic duodenogastroesophageal reflux and treatment with the carcinogen 2,6-dimethylnitrosomorpholine. Since then, several models using different surgical procedures have been developed. Recently, an improved surgical procedure led to the establishment of a gastroesophageal reflux model with a high incidence of BE that would appear to be ideal for studies of the effects of fiber and other dietary factors on the development of BE and EAC. Correlations could be made between the effects of these factors on BE and EAC and their effects on the esophageal microbiome.</p><p>In summary, additional investigations are needed to further establish the role of the esophageal microbiome in the development of esophageal cancer and the mechanism(s) by which it influences the development of the disease. Because nearly one-half of ESCC worldwide occurs in China, it would seem prudent to develop long-term intervention studies in high-risk regions of China to determine if high fiber diets (e.g., rich in wheat bran) effect the composition of the oral and esophageal microbiome and the risk for ESCC. One cohort for such studies could be subjects found by endoscopy to have hyperplastic or early-stage dysplastic lesions in the esophagus. Subjects who have undergone an esophagectomy for ESCC could be another cohort to determine If high fiber diets reduce risk for recurrent disease. Fiber constituents found to be protective in the above-described rat model of ESCC could also be tested individually or in combination to evaluate whether nutraceutical food additives might be protective in individuals at high risk for the disease. In the Western world, such studies could be conducted in smokers, especially those who consume beverages containing alcohol. Similarly, intervention studies in BE patients could further determine the effects of fiber constituents on the lesion itself and its potential progression to EAC. Correlations could be made between these effects and the bacterial composition of the oral and esophageal microbiome. Results from investigations in the rat surgical model of esophageal BE and EAC could provide valuable information for designing the human studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":11436,"journal":{"name":"eFood","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/efd2.141","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fiber and esophageal cancer prevention: Is there a role for the microbiome?\",\"authors\":\"Gary D. Stoner\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/efd2.141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Epidemiological studies suggest that dietary fiber may decrease the risk for development of colorectal cancer. There appear to be four mechanisms by which fiber is protective in the colon and rectum: (a) increasing bulk of the stool; (b) binding to colorectal carcinogens; (c) decreasing transit time of waste through the bowel; and (d) altering the microbial composition of the colon leading to reduced risk for colon cancer (Kritchevsky, <span>1997</span>; Zeng, <span>2014</span>). Both (b) and (c) reduce the interaction of carcinogens with the lining of the colon and rectum. Dietary fiber may also play a role in reducing risk for the development of esophageal cancer, perhaps through mechanisms that differ from those in colorectal cancer. Epidemiological studies have identified protective effects of fiber against the precancerous lesion, Barrett's esophagus (BE), and its conversion to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), presumably by reducing acid reflux from the stomach to the esophagus (Coleman et al., <span>2013</span>). Similar associations were observed in studies of fiber intake and risk of conversion of esophageal dysplasia to esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), but the results were not significant (Coleman et al., <span>2013</span>). However, a recent cross-sectional study in China found that subjects were at increased risk for ESCC when they consumed diets low in vegetables and fruit and this was attributed in part to low fiber intake (Zang et al., <span>2022</span>).</p><p>In any discussion of the role of fiber in disease occurrence, it is necessary to define what is meant by dietary “fiber.” Briefly, there are two types of dietary fiber, soluble and insoluble (Papandreou et al., <span>2015</span>). Both types are carbohydrates found in most plant foods. Soluble fiber (largely pectin and inulin) dissolves in water and is digested by enteric bacteria in the large intestine. Dietary sources of soluble fiber include oats, legumes, and vegetables such as carrots, cabbage, Brussels sprouts, squash, and broccoli. Soluble fiber reduces low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels in blood and helps control blood sugar by preventing rapid rises in blood sugar levels after a meal (Kritchevsky, <span>1997</span>). Insoluble fiber (cellulose, lignin) does not dissolve in water and passes directly through the gastrointestinal tract. Because it remains intact, it provides “bulk” with stool formation and speeds the movement of waste through the digestive system. Dietary sources of insoluble fiber include whole grains, rye, and fruits and vegetables. Bacterial degradation of fiber in the colon produces short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) such as butyric acid which may affect colonic and fecal pH. Butyric acid also exhibits both antiproliferative and proapoptotic activities (Vanamala et al., <span>2008</span>). Given these various functions of soluble and insoluble fiber, it seems readily apparent how fiber might reduce risk for colon cancer but not for esophageal cancer, especially given the rapid transit of dietary fiber through the esophagus and the observation that protective compounds such as butyric acid are produced mainly by bacteria in the intestine.</p><p>Extensive studies indicate that the microbial composition (microbiome) of the esophagus is linked to the development of several esophageal diseases including eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) (Harris et al., <span>2015</span>), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), BE and EAC (Gall et al., <span>2015</span>; Snider et al., <span>2018</span>; Yang et al., <span>2009</span>). Microbial analysis of secretions from the esophageal mucosa of 70 subjects with either EoE or GERD indicated that the bacterial load was increased in both EoE and GERD relative to mucosa from normal subjects (Harris et al., <span>2015</span>). <i>Haemophilus</i> was significantly increased in untreated EoE subjects as compared with normal subjects. <i>Streptocossus</i> was decreased in GERD subjects on protein pump inhibitors. In another study using biopsies of the distal esophagus obtained from 34 normal, EoE and BE patients, individuals with BE or EoE were more likely to harbor gram-negative anaerobic or microaerophilic organisms, such as <i>Haemophilus, Neisseria</i>, <i>Veillonella</i>, and <i>Prevotella</i> (Yang et al., <span>2009</span>). In contrast, healthy individuals were more likely to be dominated by <i>Streptococcus</i> species. Gall et al. reported that in a BE cohort, <i>Streptococcus</i> and <i>Prevotella</i> species dominated the upper gastrointestinal tract and the ratio of these two species was associated with waist-to-hip ratio and hiatal hernia length, two known EAC risk factors in BE patients (Gall et al., <span>2015</span>). A more recent study using saliva samples from 49 endoscopy patients without and without BE found that, at the phylum level, the oral microbiome in BE patients had significantly increased relative abundance of Firmicutes and decreased Proteobacteria (Snider et al., <span>2018</span>). At the genus level, a model including the relative abundance of <i>Lautropia, Streptococcus</i>, and a genus in the order of Bacteroidales distinguished BE from controls. The authors concluded that BE is associated with a distinct oral microbiome which may represent a potential screening marker for BE. Because BE is a precursor lesion for EAC, changes in the microbiome from normal to BE could well be important for the eventual development of EAC. The microbiome associated with EAC itself remains poorly described. Blackett et al. used 16S rRNA sequencing of prespecified bacterial species, comparing controls with patients with GERD, BE, and EAC (Blackett et al., <span>2013</span>). In many ways, the microbiome of EAC was more similar to the normal esophageal microbiome than to BE. Control and EAC samples had increased relative abundance of Bifidobacteria, <i>Bacteroides, Fusobacteria, Veillonella, Lactobacilli</i>, and <i>Staphylocossus</i> and decreased <i>Campylobacter</i> when compared to BE samples. Elliott et al. compared the microbiome of esophageal tissues from patients with BE and EAC and normal controls (Eliott et al., <span>2017</span>). They reported a decrease in microbial diversity in EAC tumor samples and increased relative abundance of <i>Lactobacillus fermentum</i>.</p><p>ESCC is the most prevalent esophageal cancer worldwide and about 50% of the cases occur in China. Numerous factors have been associated with development of the disease including poor nutritional status, low intake of fruits and vegetables, consumption of carcinogenic food products, drinking temperature hot beverages, tobacco and alcohol use, and other factors (Stoner & Gupta, <span>2001</span>). The precursor lesion for the development of ESCC is esophageal squamous dysplasia (ESD) and screening for the presence of dysplastic lesions is important for identifying individuals at risk for development of the disease. The microbiome of the esophagus in patients with ESD or ESCC has not been investigated as extensively as that in patients with BE or EAC. An early study in which a Human Oral Microbe Identification Microarray was used to test for the presence of 272 bacterial species in normal individuals and in patients with ESD indicated that the number of bacteria per sample was lower in ESD patients than in normal controls (Yu et al., <span>2014</span>). However, the specific bacterial types in the samples were not determined. Another study of 325 resected esophagus cancer specimens, of which 92% were ESCC, revealed increases in the quantity of <i>Fusobacterium nucleatum</i> in cancer specimens when compared to normal esophageal mucosa (Yamamura et al., <span>2016</span>). Moreover, the presence of <i>F</i>. nucleatum DNA in tumors was associated with shorter survival. These observations suggest that specific bacteria such as <i>F. nucleatum</i> may play a role in development of ESCC and its progression.</p><p>May and Abrams concluded in a recent review article (May & Abrams, <span>2018</span>) that the esophageal microbiome has a potentially important role in the development of esophageal EAC and ESCC, but our understanding of the role of specific bacteria in the pathogenesis of these diseases remains limited. They emphasized the need to conduct investigations directed toward modifying the bacterial composition of the esophageal microbiome and assessing effects of these modifications on disease occurrence and progression. This led Nobel et al. to test the hypothesis that dietary fiber may reduce risk for esophageal cancer by producing alterations in the esophageal microbiome (Nobel et al., <span>2018</span>). In their study, microbiome samples were collected from the squamous esophagus of 47 endoscopy patients who had completed a food frequency questionnaire quantifying fiber intake. The most abundant bacterial phyla among all samples were Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Fusobacteria. All other phyla had relative abundance <1%. At the genus level, <i>Streptococcus</i> was the most abundant bacterium. As indicated above, <i>Streptococcus</i> in the phylum Firmicutes is associated with a healthy, phenotypically normal esophagus. gram-negative bacteria comprised a mean of 49% of bacteria in the esophagus and as described above they are associated with an abnormal esophagus, including GERD and BE (Yang et al., <span>2009</span>). Samples from patients with a higher fiber intake had an increased abundance of <i>Streptococcus</i> and other members of the phylum Firmicutes and a decreased abundance of gram-negative bacteria. Low fiber intake was associated with increased abundance of several gram-negative bacteria, including <i>Prevotella, Neisseria</i>, and <i>Eikenella</i>. The authors concluded that the inverse association between dietary fiber and prevalence of gram-negative bacteria provides one mechanism by which increased fiber consumption might protect against inflammation-related esophageal diseases including GERD and BE. Interestingly, samples from only 10 of the 47 patients were found to contain bacteria that produce SCFA such as butyrate and the relative abundance of these bacteria in all positive samples was less than 1%. This suggests that the esophageal and intestinal microbiomes differ significantly in their ability to produce SCFA. Clearly, additional studies are required to further evaluate the effects of fiber on the composition of the esophageal microbiome and its role in the development of esophageal cancer.</p><p>Animal models of esophageal carcinogenesis could play an important role in assessing the effects of fiber and other dietary constituents on the esophageal microbiome and the development of esophageal cancer. A rat model of ESCC involves the induction of tumors following subcutaneous injection of rats with the carcinogen, N-nitrosomethylbenzylamine (NMBA) (Daniel & Stoner, <span>1991</span>). This model has been used extensively to evaluate the ability of multiple dietary factors including ellagic and cis-retinoic acids (Daniel & Stoner, <span>1991</span>), isothiocyanates (Stoner et al., <span>1991</span>), lyophilized black raspberries (Kresty et al., <span>2001</span>), anthocyanins (Wang et al., <span>2009</span>), green and black teas and green tea polyphenols (Morse et al., <span>1997</span>; Wang et al., <span>1995</span>), and others to reduce NMBA-induced esophageal tumor development when provided in a synthetic diet. Interestingly, the fiber constituent of black raspberries was nearly as chemopreventive as whole black raspberries in reducing NMBA-induced tumors in the rat esophagus (Wang et al., <span>2009</span>). However, it is not known whether the fiber produced changes in the bacterial composition of the esophageal microbiome. In addition, no attempts were made in this study to identify potentially bioactive components in the fiber such as pectin, cellulose and lignin to inhibit esophageal tumorigenesis and their potential effects on the esophageal microbiome.</p><p>In 1989, Pera et al. (<span>1989</span>) introduced the first rat surgical model of EAC by inducing chronic duodenogastroesophageal reflux and treatment with the carcinogen 2,6-dimethylnitrosomorpholine. Since then, several models using different surgical procedures have been developed. Recently, an improved surgical procedure led to the establishment of a gastroesophageal reflux model with a high incidence of BE that would appear to be ideal for studies of the effects of fiber and other dietary factors on the development of BE and EAC. Correlations could be made between the effects of these factors on BE and EAC and their effects on the esophageal microbiome.</p><p>In summary, additional investigations are needed to further establish the role of the esophageal microbiome in the development of esophageal cancer and the mechanism(s) by which it influences the development of the disease. Because nearly one-half of ESCC worldwide occurs in China, it would seem prudent to develop long-term intervention studies in high-risk regions of China to determine if high fiber diets (e.g., rich in wheat bran) effect the composition of the oral and esophageal microbiome and the risk for ESCC. One cohort for such studies could be subjects found by endoscopy to have hyperplastic or early-stage dysplastic lesions in the esophagus. Subjects who have undergone an esophagectomy for ESCC could be another cohort to determine If high fiber diets reduce risk for recurrent disease. Fiber constituents found to be protective in the above-described rat model of ESCC could also be tested individually or in combination to evaluate whether nutraceutical food additives might be protective in individuals at high risk for the disease. In the Western world, such studies could be conducted in smokers, especially those who consume beverages containing alcohol. Similarly, intervention studies in BE patients could further determine the effects of fiber constituents on the lesion itself and its potential progression to EAC. Correlations could be made between these effects and the bacterial composition of the oral and esophageal microbiome. Results from investigations in the rat surgical model of esophageal BE and EAC could provide valuable information for designing the human studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11436,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"eFood\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/efd2.141\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"eFood\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/efd2.141\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eFood","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/efd2.141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
流行病学研究表明,膳食纤维可能会降低患结直肠癌的风险。纤维对结肠和直肠的保护作用似乎有四种机制:(a)增加粪便的体积;(b)与结直肠致癌物结合;(c)减少废物通过肠道的时间;(d)改变结肠的微生物组成,从而降低患结肠癌的风险(Kritchevsky, 1997;曾,2014)。(b)和(c)都减少了致癌物与结肠和直肠内壁的相互作用。膳食纤维也可能在降低食管癌发病风险方面发挥作用,可能通过不同于结直肠癌的机制。流行病学研究已经确定了纤维对癌前病变、巴雷特食管(BE)及其向食管腺癌(EAC)转化的保护作用,可能是通过减少胃向食管的酸反流(Coleman等,2013)。在纤维摄入量与食管发育不良转化为食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)风险的研究中也观察到类似的关联,但结果并不显著(Coleman等人,2013)。然而,最近在中国进行的一项横断面研究发现,当受试者食用低蔬菜和水果的饮食时,ESCC的风险增加,这在一定程度上归因于低纤维摄入量(Zang等人,2022)。在讨论纤维在疾病发生中的作用时,有必要定义膳食“纤维”的含义。简而言之,膳食纤维有两种类型,可溶性和不可溶性(Papandreou et al., 2015)。这两种碳水化合物都存在于大多数植物性食物中。可溶性纤维(主要是果胶和菊粉)可溶于水,并被大肠内的肠道细菌消化。可溶性纤维的膳食来源包括燕麦、豆类和蔬菜,如胡萝卜、卷心菜、球芽甘蓝、南瓜和西兰花。可溶性纤维降低血液中的低密度脂蛋白(LDL)胆固醇水平,并通过防止餐后血糖水平迅速上升来帮助控制血糖(Kritchevsky, 1997)。不溶性纤维(纤维素、木质素)不溶于水,直接通过胃肠道。因为它保持完整,它为粪便的形成提供了“体积”,并加速了废物通过消化系统的运动。不溶性纤维的饮食来源包括全谷物、黑麦、水果和蔬菜。细菌降解结肠纤维产生短链脂肪酸(SCFA),如丁酸,可能影响结肠和粪便ph。丁酸还具有抗增殖和促凋亡活性(Vanamala et al., 2008)。考虑到可溶性和不可溶性纤维的各种功能,纤维可以降低患结肠癌的风险,但却不能降低患食道癌的风险,这似乎是显而易见的,特别是考虑到膳食纤维通过食道的快速运输,以及观察到丁酸等保护性化合物主要是由肠道中的细菌产生的。大量研究表明,食道的微生物组成(微生物组)与几种食道疾病的发生有关,包括嗜酸性食管炎(EoE) (Harris等,2015)、胃食管反流病(GERD)、BE和EAC (Gall等,2015);Snider等人,2018;Yang等人,2009)。对70名EoE或GERD患者食管粘膜分泌物的微生物分析表明,与正常受试者的粘膜相比,EoE和GERD患者的细菌负荷均有所增加(Harris et al., 2015)。与正常受试者相比,未经治疗的EoE受试者中血友病明显增加。在服用蛋白质泵抑制剂的胃食管反流患者中,链球菌数量减少。在另一项研究中,对34名正常、EoE和BE患者的食管远端进行活检,发现BE或EoE患者更可能携带革兰氏阴性厌氧或嗜微气微生物,如嗜血杆菌、奈瑟菌、细络菌和普雷沃氏菌(Yang et al., 2009)。相比之下,健康个体更有可能以链球菌种类为主。Gall等报道,在BE队列中,链球菌和普雷沃氏菌在上胃肠道中占主导地位,这两种菌的比例与腰臀比和裂孔疝长度有关,这是BE患者已知的两个EAC危险因素(Gall等,2015)。最近的一项研究使用了49名没有BE和没有BE的内窥镜患者的唾液样本,发现在门水平上,BE患者的口腔微生物组中厚壁菌门的相对丰度显著增加,变形菌门的相对丰度显著减少(Snider等人,2018)。在属水平上,包括Lautropia, Streptococcus和Bacteroidales的一个属的相对丰度的模型将BE与对照区分开来。 作者得出结论,BE与一种独特的口腔微生物群有关,这可能是BE的潜在筛选标志物。由于BE是EAC的前体病变,因此微生物群从正常到BE的变化可能对EAC的最终发展很重要。与EAC相关的微生物组本身的描述仍然很少。Blackett等人对预先指定的细菌种类进行了16S rRNA测序,将对照组与GERD、BE和EAC患者进行了比较(Blackett等人,2013)。在许多方面,EAC的微生物组与正常食管微生物组比BE更相似。与BE样品相比,对照和EAC样品的双歧杆菌、拟杆菌、梭杆菌、细杆菌、乳酸杆菌和葡萄球菌的相对丰度增加,弯曲杆菌的相对丰度减少。Elliott等人比较了BE和EAC患者与正常对照组食管组织的微生物组(Elliott等人,2017)。他们报告了EAC肿瘤样本中微生物多样性的减少和发酵乳杆菌相对丰度的增加。ESCC是世界上最常见的食管癌,约50%的病例发生在中国。许多因素与该疾病的发展有关,包括营养状况不良、水果和蔬菜摄入量低、食用致癌食品、饮用温度高的热饮、吸烟和饮酒以及其他因素(斯通纳&;古普塔,2001)。ESCC发展的前体病变是食管鳞状发育不良(ESD),筛查发育不良病变的存在对于识别具有该疾病发展风险的个体非常重要。ESD或ESCC患者的食道微生物组尚未像BE或EAC患者那样被广泛研究。在一项早期研究中,使用人类口腔微生物鉴定微阵列检测了正常人和ESD患者中272种细菌的存在,结果表明,ESD患者每个样本的细菌数量低于正常对照组(Yu et al., 2014)。然而,样品中的具体细菌类型尚未确定。另一项对325例切除的食管癌标本(其中92%为ESCC)的研究显示,与正常食管黏膜相比,癌标本中的核梭杆菌数量增加(Yamamura等,2016)。此外,在肿瘤中存在具核梭菌DNA与较短的生存期有关。这些观察结果表明,特定的细菌如具核梭菌可能在ESCC的发生和发展中起作用。梅和艾布拉姆斯在最近的一篇评论文章(May &;Abrams, 2018),食管微生物组在食管EAC和ESCC的发展中具有潜在的重要作用,但我们对特定细菌在这些疾病发病机制中的作用的理解仍然有限。他们强调有必要开展针对改变食道微生物组细菌组成的调查,并评估这些改变对疾病发生和进展的影响。这使得Nobel等人验证了膳食纤维可能通过改变食道微生物群来降低食道癌风险的假设(Nobel等人,2018)。在他们的研究中,从47名内镜患者的鳞状食管中收集微生物样本,这些患者完成了一份量化纤维摄入量的食物频率问卷。所有样品中最丰富的细菌门是厚壁菌门、变形菌门、放线菌门和梭菌门。所有其他门的相对丰度为1%。在属水平上,链球菌是数量最多的细菌。如上所述,厚壁菌门的链球菌与健康、表型正常的食道有关。革兰氏阴性菌平均占食道细菌总数的49%,如上所述,它们与食道异常有关,包括胃食管反流和BE (Yang et al., 2009)。从纤维摄入量较高的患者的样本中,链球菌和厚壁菌门其他成员的丰度增加,革兰氏阴性菌的丰度减少。纤维摄入量低与几种革兰氏阴性菌(包括普雷沃氏菌、奈瑟氏菌和艾肯氏菌)的丰度增加有关。作者得出结论,膳食纤维与革兰氏阴性菌患病率之间的负相关关系提供了一种机制,通过这种机制,增加纤维摄入量可能可以预防与炎症相关的食道疾病,包括胃食管反流和BE。有趣的是,47名患者的样本中只有10名被发现含有产生丁酸盐等SCFA的细菌,这些细菌在所有阳性样本中的相对丰度低于1%。这表明食道和肠道微生物组在产生SCFA的能力上存在显著差异。 显然,需要进一步的研究来进一步评估纤维对食道微生物群组成的影响及其在食道癌发展中的作用。食管癌动物模型的建立对于评估膳食纤维和其他成分对食管癌发生及食管癌微生物群的影响具有重要意义。在大鼠ESCC模型中,皮下注射致癌物n -亚硝基甲基苄胺(NMBA)诱发肿瘤(Daniel &;斯通内尔,1991)。该模型已被广泛用于评估多种饮食因素的能力,包括鞣花酸和顺式维甲酸(Daniel &;斯通纳,1991),异硫氰酸酯(斯通纳等人,1991),冻干黑树莓(克雷斯蒂等人,2001),花青素(王等人,2009),绿茶和红茶以及绿茶多酚(莫尔斯等人,1997;Wang et al., 1995)等人在合成饮食中减少nmba诱导的食管肿瘤发展。有趣的是,在减少nmba诱导的大鼠食道肿瘤方面,黑树莓的纤维成分几乎与整个黑树莓一样具有化学预防作用(Wang et al., 2009)。然而,尚不清楚纤维是否会改变食道微生物群的细菌组成。此外,本研究没有尝试鉴定纤维中潜在的生物活性成分,如果胶、纤维素和木质素,以抑制食道肿瘤的发生及其对食道微生物群的潜在影响。1989年,Pera et al.(1989)通过诱导慢性十二指肠胃食管反流和致癌物2,6-二甲基亚硝基吗啡治疗,建立了首个EAC大鼠手术模型。从那时起,使用不同手术方法的几种模型被开发出来。最近,一种改进的外科手术方法建立了一个高BE发生率的胃食管反流模型,这似乎是研究纤维和其他饮食因素对BE和EAC发展影响的理想选择。这些因素对be和EAC的影响与其对食管微生物群的影响之间可能存在相关性。总之,需要进一步的研究来进一步确定食道微生物群在食道癌发展中的作用及其影响疾病发展的机制。由于全球近一半的ESCC发生在中国,因此在中国高风险地区开展长期干预研究似乎是谨慎的,以确定高纤维饮食(例如富含麦麸)是否会影响口腔和食管微生物组的组成以及ESCC的风险。此类研究的一个队列可能是通过内窥镜检查发现食管有增生或早期发育不良病变的受试者。接受食管切除术的ESCC患者可以作为另一个队列,以确定高纤维饮食是否能降低疾病复发的风险。在上述ESCC大鼠模型中发现的具有保护作用的纤维成分也可以单独或联合进行测试,以评估营养食品添加剂是否可能对患有该疾病的高风险个体具有保护作用。在西方世界,这类研究可以在吸烟者中进行,尤其是那些饮用含酒精饮料的人。同样,BE患者的干预研究可以进一步确定纤维成分对病变本身的影响及其向EAC的潜在进展。这些影响可能与口腔和食管微生物组的细菌组成有关。大鼠食管BE和EAC手术模型的研究结果为设计人体实验提供了有价值的信息。
Fiber and esophageal cancer prevention: Is there a role for the microbiome?
Epidemiological studies suggest that dietary fiber may decrease the risk for development of colorectal cancer. There appear to be four mechanisms by which fiber is protective in the colon and rectum: (a) increasing bulk of the stool; (b) binding to colorectal carcinogens; (c) decreasing transit time of waste through the bowel; and (d) altering the microbial composition of the colon leading to reduced risk for colon cancer (Kritchevsky, 1997; Zeng, 2014). Both (b) and (c) reduce the interaction of carcinogens with the lining of the colon and rectum. Dietary fiber may also play a role in reducing risk for the development of esophageal cancer, perhaps through mechanisms that differ from those in colorectal cancer. Epidemiological studies have identified protective effects of fiber against the precancerous lesion, Barrett's esophagus (BE), and its conversion to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), presumably by reducing acid reflux from the stomach to the esophagus (Coleman et al., 2013). Similar associations were observed in studies of fiber intake and risk of conversion of esophageal dysplasia to esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), but the results were not significant (Coleman et al., 2013). However, a recent cross-sectional study in China found that subjects were at increased risk for ESCC when they consumed diets low in vegetables and fruit and this was attributed in part to low fiber intake (Zang et al., 2022).
In any discussion of the role of fiber in disease occurrence, it is necessary to define what is meant by dietary “fiber.” Briefly, there are two types of dietary fiber, soluble and insoluble (Papandreou et al., 2015). Both types are carbohydrates found in most plant foods. Soluble fiber (largely pectin and inulin) dissolves in water and is digested by enteric bacteria in the large intestine. Dietary sources of soluble fiber include oats, legumes, and vegetables such as carrots, cabbage, Brussels sprouts, squash, and broccoli. Soluble fiber reduces low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels in blood and helps control blood sugar by preventing rapid rises in blood sugar levels after a meal (Kritchevsky, 1997). Insoluble fiber (cellulose, lignin) does not dissolve in water and passes directly through the gastrointestinal tract. Because it remains intact, it provides “bulk” with stool formation and speeds the movement of waste through the digestive system. Dietary sources of insoluble fiber include whole grains, rye, and fruits and vegetables. Bacterial degradation of fiber in the colon produces short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) such as butyric acid which may affect colonic and fecal pH. Butyric acid also exhibits both antiproliferative and proapoptotic activities (Vanamala et al., 2008). Given these various functions of soluble and insoluble fiber, it seems readily apparent how fiber might reduce risk for colon cancer but not for esophageal cancer, especially given the rapid transit of dietary fiber through the esophagus and the observation that protective compounds such as butyric acid are produced mainly by bacteria in the intestine.
Extensive studies indicate that the microbial composition (microbiome) of the esophagus is linked to the development of several esophageal diseases including eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) (Harris et al., 2015), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), BE and EAC (Gall et al., 2015; Snider et al., 2018; Yang et al., 2009). Microbial analysis of secretions from the esophageal mucosa of 70 subjects with either EoE or GERD indicated that the bacterial load was increased in both EoE and GERD relative to mucosa from normal subjects (Harris et al., 2015). Haemophilus was significantly increased in untreated EoE subjects as compared with normal subjects. Streptocossus was decreased in GERD subjects on protein pump inhibitors. In another study using biopsies of the distal esophagus obtained from 34 normal, EoE and BE patients, individuals with BE or EoE were more likely to harbor gram-negative anaerobic or microaerophilic organisms, such as Haemophilus, Neisseria, Veillonella, and Prevotella (Yang et al., 2009). In contrast, healthy individuals were more likely to be dominated by Streptococcus species. Gall et al. reported that in a BE cohort, Streptococcus and Prevotella species dominated the upper gastrointestinal tract and the ratio of these two species was associated with waist-to-hip ratio and hiatal hernia length, two known EAC risk factors in BE patients (Gall et al., 2015). A more recent study using saliva samples from 49 endoscopy patients without and without BE found that, at the phylum level, the oral microbiome in BE patients had significantly increased relative abundance of Firmicutes and decreased Proteobacteria (Snider et al., 2018). At the genus level, a model including the relative abundance of Lautropia, Streptococcus, and a genus in the order of Bacteroidales distinguished BE from controls. The authors concluded that BE is associated with a distinct oral microbiome which may represent a potential screening marker for BE. Because BE is a precursor lesion for EAC, changes in the microbiome from normal to BE could well be important for the eventual development of EAC. The microbiome associated with EAC itself remains poorly described. Blackett et al. used 16S rRNA sequencing of prespecified bacterial species, comparing controls with patients with GERD, BE, and EAC (Blackett et al., 2013). In many ways, the microbiome of EAC was more similar to the normal esophageal microbiome than to BE. Control and EAC samples had increased relative abundance of Bifidobacteria, Bacteroides, Fusobacteria, Veillonella, Lactobacilli, and Staphylocossus and decreased Campylobacter when compared to BE samples. Elliott et al. compared the microbiome of esophageal tissues from patients with BE and EAC and normal controls (Eliott et al., 2017). They reported a decrease in microbial diversity in EAC tumor samples and increased relative abundance of Lactobacillus fermentum.
ESCC is the most prevalent esophageal cancer worldwide and about 50% of the cases occur in China. Numerous factors have been associated with development of the disease including poor nutritional status, low intake of fruits and vegetables, consumption of carcinogenic food products, drinking temperature hot beverages, tobacco and alcohol use, and other factors (Stoner & Gupta, 2001). The precursor lesion for the development of ESCC is esophageal squamous dysplasia (ESD) and screening for the presence of dysplastic lesions is important for identifying individuals at risk for development of the disease. The microbiome of the esophagus in patients with ESD or ESCC has not been investigated as extensively as that in patients with BE or EAC. An early study in which a Human Oral Microbe Identification Microarray was used to test for the presence of 272 bacterial species in normal individuals and in patients with ESD indicated that the number of bacteria per sample was lower in ESD patients than in normal controls (Yu et al., 2014). However, the specific bacterial types in the samples were not determined. Another study of 325 resected esophagus cancer specimens, of which 92% were ESCC, revealed increases in the quantity of Fusobacterium nucleatum in cancer specimens when compared to normal esophageal mucosa (Yamamura et al., 2016). Moreover, the presence of F. nucleatum DNA in tumors was associated with shorter survival. These observations suggest that specific bacteria such as F. nucleatum may play a role in development of ESCC and its progression.
May and Abrams concluded in a recent review article (May & Abrams, 2018) that the esophageal microbiome has a potentially important role in the development of esophageal EAC and ESCC, but our understanding of the role of specific bacteria in the pathogenesis of these diseases remains limited. They emphasized the need to conduct investigations directed toward modifying the bacterial composition of the esophageal microbiome and assessing effects of these modifications on disease occurrence and progression. This led Nobel et al. to test the hypothesis that dietary fiber may reduce risk for esophageal cancer by producing alterations in the esophageal microbiome (Nobel et al., 2018). In their study, microbiome samples were collected from the squamous esophagus of 47 endoscopy patients who had completed a food frequency questionnaire quantifying fiber intake. The most abundant bacterial phyla among all samples were Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Fusobacteria. All other phyla had relative abundance <1%. At the genus level, Streptococcus was the most abundant bacterium. As indicated above, Streptococcus in the phylum Firmicutes is associated with a healthy, phenotypically normal esophagus. gram-negative bacteria comprised a mean of 49% of bacteria in the esophagus and as described above they are associated with an abnormal esophagus, including GERD and BE (Yang et al., 2009). Samples from patients with a higher fiber intake had an increased abundance of Streptococcus and other members of the phylum Firmicutes and a decreased abundance of gram-negative bacteria. Low fiber intake was associated with increased abundance of several gram-negative bacteria, including Prevotella, Neisseria, and Eikenella. The authors concluded that the inverse association between dietary fiber and prevalence of gram-negative bacteria provides one mechanism by which increased fiber consumption might protect against inflammation-related esophageal diseases including GERD and BE. Interestingly, samples from only 10 of the 47 patients were found to contain bacteria that produce SCFA such as butyrate and the relative abundance of these bacteria in all positive samples was less than 1%. This suggests that the esophageal and intestinal microbiomes differ significantly in their ability to produce SCFA. Clearly, additional studies are required to further evaluate the effects of fiber on the composition of the esophageal microbiome and its role in the development of esophageal cancer.
Animal models of esophageal carcinogenesis could play an important role in assessing the effects of fiber and other dietary constituents on the esophageal microbiome and the development of esophageal cancer. A rat model of ESCC involves the induction of tumors following subcutaneous injection of rats with the carcinogen, N-nitrosomethylbenzylamine (NMBA) (Daniel & Stoner, 1991). This model has been used extensively to evaluate the ability of multiple dietary factors including ellagic and cis-retinoic acids (Daniel & Stoner, 1991), isothiocyanates (Stoner et al., 1991), lyophilized black raspberries (Kresty et al., 2001), anthocyanins (Wang et al., 2009), green and black teas and green tea polyphenols (Morse et al., 1997; Wang et al., 1995), and others to reduce NMBA-induced esophageal tumor development when provided in a synthetic diet. Interestingly, the fiber constituent of black raspberries was nearly as chemopreventive as whole black raspberries in reducing NMBA-induced tumors in the rat esophagus (Wang et al., 2009). However, it is not known whether the fiber produced changes in the bacterial composition of the esophageal microbiome. In addition, no attempts were made in this study to identify potentially bioactive components in the fiber such as pectin, cellulose and lignin to inhibit esophageal tumorigenesis and their potential effects on the esophageal microbiome.
In 1989, Pera et al. (1989) introduced the first rat surgical model of EAC by inducing chronic duodenogastroesophageal reflux and treatment with the carcinogen 2,6-dimethylnitrosomorpholine. Since then, several models using different surgical procedures have been developed. Recently, an improved surgical procedure led to the establishment of a gastroesophageal reflux model with a high incidence of BE that would appear to be ideal for studies of the effects of fiber and other dietary factors on the development of BE and EAC. Correlations could be made between the effects of these factors on BE and EAC and their effects on the esophageal microbiome.
In summary, additional investigations are needed to further establish the role of the esophageal microbiome in the development of esophageal cancer and the mechanism(s) by which it influences the development of the disease. Because nearly one-half of ESCC worldwide occurs in China, it would seem prudent to develop long-term intervention studies in high-risk regions of China to determine if high fiber diets (e.g., rich in wheat bran) effect the composition of the oral and esophageal microbiome and the risk for ESCC. One cohort for such studies could be subjects found by endoscopy to have hyperplastic or early-stage dysplastic lesions in the esophagus. Subjects who have undergone an esophagectomy for ESCC could be another cohort to determine If high fiber diets reduce risk for recurrent disease. Fiber constituents found to be protective in the above-described rat model of ESCC could also be tested individually or in combination to evaluate whether nutraceutical food additives might be protective in individuals at high risk for the disease. In the Western world, such studies could be conducted in smokers, especially those who consume beverages containing alcohol. Similarly, intervention studies in BE patients could further determine the effects of fiber constituents on the lesion itself and its potential progression to EAC. Correlations could be made between these effects and the bacterial composition of the oral and esophageal microbiome. Results from investigations in the rat surgical model of esophageal BE and EAC could provide valuable information for designing the human studies.
期刊介绍:
eFood is the official journal of the International Association of Dietetic Nutrition and Safety (IADNS) which eFood aims to cover all aspects of food science and technology. The journal’s mission is to advance and disseminate knowledge of food science, and to promote and foster research into the chemistry, nutrition and safety of food worldwide, by supporting open dissemination and lively discourse about a wide range of the most important topics in global food and health.
The Editors welcome original research articles, comprehensive reviews, mini review, highlights, news, short reports, perspectives and correspondences on both experimental work and policy management in relation to food chemistry, nutrition, food health and safety, etc. Research areas covered in the journal include, but are not limited to, the following:
● Food chemistry
● Nutrition
● Food safety
● Food and health
● Food technology and sustainability
● Food processing
● Sensory and consumer science
● Food microbiology
● Food toxicology
● Food packaging
● Food security
● Healthy foods
● Super foods
● Food science (general)