干旱和黄瓜花叶病毒侵染对豇豆生理反应及产量的影响

IF 2.4 4区 生物学 Q2 PLANT SCIENCES
I. O. Adebara, A. O. Adediji, S. A. Adejumo
{"title":"干旱和黄瓜花叶病毒侵染对豇豆生理反应及产量的影响","authors":"I. O. Adebara,&nbsp;A. O. Adediji,&nbsp;S. A. Adejumo","doi":"10.1007/s11738-024-03756-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As climate change continues to negatively influence cropping seasons and patterns especially in Africa, field crops are constantly exposed to simultaneous environmental and biotic stresses. Constraints, such as drought and virus infections, occurring either as individual or combined stresses, limit cowpea production. In this study, we investigated the responses of two cowpea varieties with contrasting cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) susceptibilities, ‘Ife-Brown’ (highly susceptible) and ‘IT97K-1042-3’ (moderately susceptible), simultaneously exposed to varying drought regimes and CMV infection. The cowpea plants were mechanically inoculated with CMV nine days after planting and exposed to three levels of water stress (zero, six and 12 days of water stress) at 3 weeks after planting. Data on vegetative and yield parameters, biomass, canopy temperature, chlorophyll and proline contents were collected. The effects of CMV infection alone on cowpea growth and yield parameters were greater than those of drought stress alone, while the combination of CMV and water deficit was more deleterious than the individual treatments. Conversely, six days of water stress improved the growth and yield of both cowpea varieties. Between the two varieties, ‘Ife-Brown’ outperformed ‘IT97K-1042-3’ in terms of growth and biomass accumulation. However, the canopy temperature increased with the number of days of water stress although the values were not statistically different from the control plants. Variations in proline accumulation were observed more positively correlated with drought than with CMV infection. A greater proline content was detected in cowpea exposed to severe drought than in plants subjected only to CMV infection. Combined drought and virus stress reduced cowpea yields while ‘Ife-Brown’ was more tolerant than ‘IT97K-1042-3’. Comparing the effects of CMV infection and drought on both cowpea varieties, ‘Ife-Brown’ had greater vegetative parameters, biomass accumulation and yield than ‘IT97K-1042-3’. The effects of drought and virus infection on cowpea plants, within the context of climate change, are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":6973,"journal":{"name":"Acta Physiologiae Plantarum","volume":"47 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of drought and cucumber mosaic virus infection on the physiological responses and yield of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.)\",\"authors\":\"I. O. Adebara,&nbsp;A. O. Adediji,&nbsp;S. A. Adejumo\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11738-024-03756-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>As climate change continues to negatively influence cropping seasons and patterns especially in Africa, field crops are constantly exposed to simultaneous environmental and biotic stresses. Constraints, such as drought and virus infections, occurring either as individual or combined stresses, limit cowpea production. In this study, we investigated the responses of two cowpea varieties with contrasting cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) susceptibilities, ‘Ife-Brown’ (highly susceptible) and ‘IT97K-1042-3’ (moderately susceptible), simultaneously exposed to varying drought regimes and CMV infection. The cowpea plants were mechanically inoculated with CMV nine days after planting and exposed to three levels of water stress (zero, six and 12 days of water stress) at 3 weeks after planting. Data on vegetative and yield parameters, biomass, canopy temperature, chlorophyll and proline contents were collected. The effects of CMV infection alone on cowpea growth and yield parameters were greater than those of drought stress alone, while the combination of CMV and water deficit was more deleterious than the individual treatments. Conversely, six days of water stress improved the growth and yield of both cowpea varieties. Between the two varieties, ‘Ife-Brown’ outperformed ‘IT97K-1042-3’ in terms of growth and biomass accumulation. However, the canopy temperature increased with the number of days of water stress although the values were not statistically different from the control plants. Variations in proline accumulation were observed more positively correlated with drought than with CMV infection. A greater proline content was detected in cowpea exposed to severe drought than in plants subjected only to CMV infection. Combined drought and virus stress reduced cowpea yields while ‘Ife-Brown’ was more tolerant than ‘IT97K-1042-3’. Comparing the effects of CMV infection and drought on both cowpea varieties, ‘Ife-Brown’ had greater vegetative parameters, biomass accumulation and yield than ‘IT97K-1042-3’. The effects of drought and virus infection on cowpea plants, within the context of climate change, are discussed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Physiologiae Plantarum\",\"volume\":\"47 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Physiologiae Plantarum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11738-024-03756-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Physiologiae Plantarum","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11738-024-03756-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于气候变化继续对种植季节和模式产生负面影响,特别是在非洲,大田作物不断同时面临环境和生物压力。制约因素,如干旱和病毒感染,无论是单独的还是联合的,都限制了豇豆的生产。在这项研究中,我们研究了两个豇豆品种对黄瓜花叶病毒(CMV)的敏感性,‘ Ife-Brown ’(高度敏感)和‘ IT97K-1042-3 ’(中度敏感),同时暴露在不同的干旱条件和CMV感染下。将豇豆植株在播种后第9天机械接种CMV,并在播种后第3周暴露于3个水分胁迫水平(0、6和12天)。收集了营养和产量参数、生物量、冠层温度、叶绿素和脯氨酸含量等数据。CMV单独侵染对豇豆生长和产量参数的影响大于干旱胁迫,而CMV与水分亏缺联合侵染的危害大于单独处理。相反,6天的水分胁迫促进了两个豇豆品种的生长和产量。在两个品种中,‘life - brown’在生长和生物量积累方面优于‘IT97K-1042-3’。冠层温度随水分胁迫天数的增加而升高,但与对照植株差异无统计学意义。脯氨酸积累的变化与干旱的正相关大于与巨细胞病毒感染的正相关。经严重干旱处理的豇豆脯氨酸含量高于单纯CMV感染的豇豆。干旱和病毒联合胁迫降低了豇豆产量,而life - brown比IT97K-1042-3更具耐受性。比较CMV侵染和干旱对两个豇豆品种的影响,‘life - brown’的营养参数、生物量积累和产量均高于‘IT97K-1042-3’。讨论了气候变化背景下干旱和病毒感染对豇豆植株的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Impact of drought and cucumber mosaic virus infection on the physiological responses and yield of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.)

Impact of drought and cucumber mosaic virus infection on the physiological responses and yield of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.)

As climate change continues to negatively influence cropping seasons and patterns especially in Africa, field crops are constantly exposed to simultaneous environmental and biotic stresses. Constraints, such as drought and virus infections, occurring either as individual or combined stresses, limit cowpea production. In this study, we investigated the responses of two cowpea varieties with contrasting cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) susceptibilities, ‘Ife-Brown’ (highly susceptible) and ‘IT97K-1042-3’ (moderately susceptible), simultaneously exposed to varying drought regimes and CMV infection. The cowpea plants were mechanically inoculated with CMV nine days after planting and exposed to three levels of water stress (zero, six and 12 days of water stress) at 3 weeks after planting. Data on vegetative and yield parameters, biomass, canopy temperature, chlorophyll and proline contents were collected. The effects of CMV infection alone on cowpea growth and yield parameters were greater than those of drought stress alone, while the combination of CMV and water deficit was more deleterious than the individual treatments. Conversely, six days of water stress improved the growth and yield of both cowpea varieties. Between the two varieties, ‘Ife-Brown’ outperformed ‘IT97K-1042-3’ in terms of growth and biomass accumulation. However, the canopy temperature increased with the number of days of water stress although the values were not statistically different from the control plants. Variations in proline accumulation were observed more positively correlated with drought than with CMV infection. A greater proline content was detected in cowpea exposed to severe drought than in plants subjected only to CMV infection. Combined drought and virus stress reduced cowpea yields while ‘Ife-Brown’ was more tolerant than ‘IT97K-1042-3’. Comparing the effects of CMV infection and drought on both cowpea varieties, ‘Ife-Brown’ had greater vegetative parameters, biomass accumulation and yield than ‘IT97K-1042-3’. The effects of drought and virus infection on cowpea plants, within the context of climate change, are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Physiologiae Plantarum
Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
125
审稿时长
3.1 months
期刊介绍: Acta Physiologiae Plantarum is an international journal established in 1978 that publishes peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of plant physiology. The coverage ranges across this research field at various levels of biological organization, from relevant aspects in molecular and cell biology to biochemistry. The coverage is global in scope, offering articles of interest from experts around the world. The range of topics includes measuring effects of environmental pollution on crop species; analysis of genomic organization; effects of drought and climatic conditions on plants; studies of photosynthesis in ornamental plants, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信