谁关心农业?用结构主题模型分析德国议会关于农业和食品的辩论

IF 6.8 1区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Philipp Mennig
{"title":"谁关心农业?用结构主题模型分析德国议会关于农业和食品的辩论","authors":"Philipp Mennig","doi":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2024.102788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study employs structural topic modeling (STM) to quantitatively and for the first time analyze parliamentary debates on agriculture and food in the German Bundestag, focusing on the period leading up to the 2023 reform of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). Drawing on data from parliamentary speeches between January 2017 and June 2022, the research aims to understand whether and, if so, how key challenges of the agri-food sector identified by scientists are addressed by the parliamentarians. The paper thus adds empirical evidence concerning the debate on the uptake of research knowledge in politics. It does so by identifying key topics, tracking their temporal evolution, and assessing how party affiliation, constituency, gender, and age of the speakers influence discourse. The results reveal 24 distinct topics, spanning areas such as agriculture-environment interactions, rural development, animal welfare, and economic aspects of farming. Temporal analysis shows shifting priorities over time, with economic issues and sector transformation gaining prominence as CAP negotiations progress. Critically, the findings suggest that parliamentary discourse in Germany aligns with main challenges the agri-food sector faces, albeit with variations influenced by party affiliation, geographical and demographic factors. Overall, this study contributes to a better understanding of parliamentary engagement with agricultural issues and informs policy-making and voter decision-making processes. Its breakdown of how (frequently) certain issues were discussed reveals general trends, but also country-specific challenges, allowing for better comparative policy analysis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":"130 ","pages":"Article 102788"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who cares about agriculture? Analyzing German parliamentary debates on agriculture and food with structural topic modeling\",\"authors\":\"Philipp Mennig\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foodpol.2024.102788\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study employs structural topic modeling (STM) to quantitatively and for the first time analyze parliamentary debates on agriculture and food in the German Bundestag, focusing on the period leading up to the 2023 reform of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). Drawing on data from parliamentary speeches between January 2017 and June 2022, the research aims to understand whether and, if so, how key challenges of the agri-food sector identified by scientists are addressed by the parliamentarians. The paper thus adds empirical evidence concerning the debate on the uptake of research knowledge in politics. It does so by identifying key topics, tracking their temporal evolution, and assessing how party affiliation, constituency, gender, and age of the speakers influence discourse. The results reveal 24 distinct topics, spanning areas such as agriculture-environment interactions, rural development, animal welfare, and economic aspects of farming. Temporal analysis shows shifting priorities over time, with economic issues and sector transformation gaining prominence as CAP negotiations progress. Critically, the findings suggest that parliamentary discourse in Germany aligns with main challenges the agri-food sector faces, albeit with variations influenced by party affiliation, geographical and demographic factors. Overall, this study contributes to a better understanding of parliamentary engagement with agricultural issues and informs policy-making and voter decision-making processes. Its breakdown of how (frequently) certain issues were discussed reveals general trends, but also country-specific challenges, allowing for better comparative policy analysis.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Policy\",\"volume\":\"130 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102788\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919224001994\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Policy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919224001994","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究采用结构主题模型(STM),首次定量分析了德国联邦议院关于农业和食品的议会辩论,重点关注2023年共同农业政策(CAP)改革之前的时期。根据2017年1月至2022年6月期间议会演讲的数据,该研究旨在了解议员们是否以及如果是这样,科学家们确定的农业食品部门的关键挑战如何得到解决。因此,本文增加了关于政治中研究知识吸收的争论的经验证据。它通过确定关键主题,跟踪它们的时间演变,并评估党派关系,选区,性别和说话者的年龄如何影响话语来做到这一点。研究结果揭示了24个不同的主题,涵盖农业与环境的相互作用、农村发展、动物福利和农业的经济方面等领域。时间分析显示,随着时间的推移,优先事项不断变化,随着共同农业政策谈判的进展,经济问题和部门转型日益突出。至关重要的是,研究结果表明,德国议会的话语与农业食品部门面临的主要挑战是一致的,尽管受到党派关系、地理和人口因素的影响。总体而言,本研究有助于更好地理解议会对农业问题的参与,并为政策制定和选民决策过程提供信息。它对讨论某些问题的频率进行了分类,揭示了一般趋势,但也揭示了具体国家的挑战,以便进行更好的比较政策分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Who cares about agriculture? Analyzing German parliamentary debates on agriculture and food with structural topic modeling
This study employs structural topic modeling (STM) to quantitatively and for the first time analyze parliamentary debates on agriculture and food in the German Bundestag, focusing on the period leading up to the 2023 reform of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). Drawing on data from parliamentary speeches between January 2017 and June 2022, the research aims to understand whether and, if so, how key challenges of the agri-food sector identified by scientists are addressed by the parliamentarians. The paper thus adds empirical evidence concerning the debate on the uptake of research knowledge in politics. It does so by identifying key topics, tracking their temporal evolution, and assessing how party affiliation, constituency, gender, and age of the speakers influence discourse. The results reveal 24 distinct topics, spanning areas such as agriculture-environment interactions, rural development, animal welfare, and economic aspects of farming. Temporal analysis shows shifting priorities over time, with economic issues and sector transformation gaining prominence as CAP negotiations progress. Critically, the findings suggest that parliamentary discourse in Germany aligns with main challenges the agri-food sector faces, albeit with variations influenced by party affiliation, geographical and demographic factors. Overall, this study contributes to a better understanding of parliamentary engagement with agricultural issues and informs policy-making and voter decision-making processes. Its breakdown of how (frequently) certain issues were discussed reveals general trends, but also country-specific challenges, allowing for better comparative policy analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food Policy
Food Policy 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.60%
发文量
128
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Food Policy is a multidisciplinary journal publishing original research and novel evidence on issues in the formulation, implementation, and evaluation of policies for the food sector in developing, transition, and advanced economies. Our main focus is on the economic and social aspect of food policy, and we prioritize empirical studies informing international food policy debates. Provided that articles make a clear and explicit contribution to food policy debates of international interest, we consider papers from any of the social sciences. Papers from other disciplines (e.g., law) will be considered only if they provide a key policy contribution, and are written in a style which is accessible to a social science readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信