为什么不分享呢?-了解波兰华沙对汽车共享服务的偏好

IF 2.4 Q3 TRANSPORTATION
Jakub Zawieska , Michał Jakubczyk , Katarzyna Zagórska , Joanna Jaczewska , Ewa Zawojska , Pål Wilter Skedsmo , Michał Wolański
{"title":"为什么不分享呢?-了解波兰华沙对汽车共享服务的偏好","authors":"Jakub Zawieska ,&nbsp;Michał Jakubczyk ,&nbsp;Katarzyna Zagórska ,&nbsp;Joanna Jaczewska ,&nbsp;Ewa Zawojska ,&nbsp;Pål Wilter Skedsmo ,&nbsp;Michał Wolański","doi":"10.1016/j.cstp.2024.101346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Encouraging the transition to car sharing services (CSS) in cities may reduce parking space needs, traffic and pollution. This study focuses on Warsaw, Poland, as a case study of a city in Central and Eastern Europe, where CSS adoption has been lacklustre with some CSS being discontinued. To gain a deeper understanding of the lack of acceptance we aimed (1) to elicit the preferences for CSS among citizens of Warsaw, and (2) to assess how the provision of information influences attitudes toward CSS. We surveyed a random sample of 1,157 adult Warsaw citizens online, half of whom were exposed to information on CSS benefits. To gauge preferences across various scenarios, we employed a discrete choice experiment, wherein respondents selected their preferred CSS option to be launched, not limited to a specific single trip. Our findings reveal that the provision of additional information had no impact on preferences or anticipated usage. Through latent class modelling of the choices (including a garbage class to control for data quality), we identified two distinct respondent classes. These classes diverged primarily in their attitudes toward engine types: the majority class (72%) favoured combustion engines, while the minority class (22%) preferred battery-electric ones. The larger class exhibited a greater need for additional benefits (e.g. exclusive parking spots, access to bus lanes) and nationwide travel options. Our study underscores the importance of both municipal support for CSS and recognition of the diversity of preferences among potential users for the successful deployment of CSS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46989,"journal":{"name":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 101346"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why not share it? — Understanding preferences for car sharing services in Warsaw, Poland\",\"authors\":\"Jakub Zawieska ,&nbsp;Michał Jakubczyk ,&nbsp;Katarzyna Zagórska ,&nbsp;Joanna Jaczewska ,&nbsp;Ewa Zawojska ,&nbsp;Pål Wilter Skedsmo ,&nbsp;Michał Wolański\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cstp.2024.101346\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Encouraging the transition to car sharing services (CSS) in cities may reduce parking space needs, traffic and pollution. This study focuses on Warsaw, Poland, as a case study of a city in Central and Eastern Europe, where CSS adoption has been lacklustre with some CSS being discontinued. To gain a deeper understanding of the lack of acceptance we aimed (1) to elicit the preferences for CSS among citizens of Warsaw, and (2) to assess how the provision of information influences attitudes toward CSS. We surveyed a random sample of 1,157 adult Warsaw citizens online, half of whom were exposed to information on CSS benefits. To gauge preferences across various scenarios, we employed a discrete choice experiment, wherein respondents selected their preferred CSS option to be launched, not limited to a specific single trip. Our findings reveal that the provision of additional information had no impact on preferences or anticipated usage. Through latent class modelling of the choices (including a garbage class to control for data quality), we identified two distinct respondent classes. These classes diverged primarily in their attitudes toward engine types: the majority class (72%) favoured combustion engines, while the minority class (22%) preferred battery-electric ones. The larger class exhibited a greater need for additional benefits (e.g. exclusive parking spots, access to bus lanes) and nationwide travel options. Our study underscores the importance of both municipal support for CSS and recognition of the diversity of preferences among potential users for the successful deployment of CSS.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Case Studies on Transport Policy\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101346\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Case Studies on Transport Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213624X24002013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213624X24002013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鼓励城市向汽车共享服务(CSS)过渡可能会减少停车位需求、交通拥堵和污染。本研究的重点是波兰华沙,作为中欧和东欧的一个城市的案例研究,在那里,CSS的采用一直很平淡,有些CSS已经停产。为了更深入地了解缺乏接受度,我们的目标是(1)引出华沙公民对CSS的偏好,(2)评估信息的提供如何影响对CSS的态度。我们在网上随机调查了1157名成年华沙公民,其中一半人接触过CSS好处的信息。为了衡量不同场景的偏好,我们采用了离散选择实验,其中受访者选择他们最喜欢的CSS选项来启动,而不限于特定的单一旅行。我们的研究结果表明,提供额外的信息对偏好或预期使用没有影响。通过对选择的潜在类建模(包括控制数据质量的垃圾类),我们确定了两个不同的应答类。这些阶层对发动机类型的态度主要存在分歧:大多数阶层(72%)偏爱内燃发动机,而少数阶层(22%)偏爱电池电动发动机。较大的班级表现出对额外福利的更大需求(例如专用停车位,公共汽车专用道)和全国旅行选择。我们的研究强调了对CSS的市政支持和对潜在用户偏好多样性的认识对于成功部署CSS的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why not share it? — Understanding preferences for car sharing services in Warsaw, Poland
Encouraging the transition to car sharing services (CSS) in cities may reduce parking space needs, traffic and pollution. This study focuses on Warsaw, Poland, as a case study of a city in Central and Eastern Europe, where CSS adoption has been lacklustre with some CSS being discontinued. To gain a deeper understanding of the lack of acceptance we aimed (1) to elicit the preferences for CSS among citizens of Warsaw, and (2) to assess how the provision of information influences attitudes toward CSS. We surveyed a random sample of 1,157 adult Warsaw citizens online, half of whom were exposed to information on CSS benefits. To gauge preferences across various scenarios, we employed a discrete choice experiment, wherein respondents selected their preferred CSS option to be launched, not limited to a specific single trip. Our findings reveal that the provision of additional information had no impact on preferences or anticipated usage. Through latent class modelling of the choices (including a garbage class to control for data quality), we identified two distinct respondent classes. These classes diverged primarily in their attitudes toward engine types: the majority class (72%) favoured combustion engines, while the minority class (22%) preferred battery-electric ones. The larger class exhibited a greater need for additional benefits (e.g. exclusive parking spots, access to bus lanes) and nationwide travel options. Our study underscores the importance of both municipal support for CSS and recognition of the diversity of preferences among potential users for the successful deployment of CSS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
12.00%
发文量
222
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信