对影响驾驶员转向电动吉普尼意愿的环境、健康和社会经济因素进行反馈导向分析

IF 3.3 Q3 TRANSPORTATION
Case Studies on Transport Policy Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-18 DOI:10.1016/j.cstp.2025.101369
C. Kendra Gotangco Gonzales , Katrina Abenojar , Carlos Rosauro Manalo , Melliza Templonuevo Cruz , Maria Obiminda Cambaliza , James Bernard Simpas , Imee Delos Reyes , John Wong , Bernell Go , Krizelle Cleo Fowler , Rene Marlon Panti , Emma Porio , Jean Jardeleza Mijares
{"title":"对影响驾驶员转向电动吉普尼意愿的环境、健康和社会经济因素进行反馈导向分析","authors":"C. Kendra Gotangco Gonzales ,&nbsp;Katrina Abenojar ,&nbsp;Carlos Rosauro Manalo ,&nbsp;Melliza Templonuevo Cruz ,&nbsp;Maria Obiminda Cambaliza ,&nbsp;James Bernard Simpas ,&nbsp;Imee Delos Reyes ,&nbsp;John Wong ,&nbsp;Bernell Go ,&nbsp;Krizelle Cleo Fowler ,&nbsp;Rene Marlon Panti ,&nbsp;Emma Porio ,&nbsp;Jean Jardeleza Mijares","doi":"10.1016/j.cstp.2025.101369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Jeepney Modernization Program involves the replacement of traditional jeepneys with more efficient alternatives, including modern enclosed electric vehicles, alongside operational improvements to the public transportation system. This study aims to assess the environmental, health and socio-economic factors impacting drivers’ willingness to shift to e-jeepneys. Feedback-Guided Analysis was used as a framework for designing an interdisciplinary approach towards understanding the decision-making paradigms of drivers plying a specific route in Quezon City, Metro Manila. Measurements of drivers’ exposure to PM<sub>2.5</sub> and associated health parameters were complemented by key informant interviews delving into income, expenses, valuation of benefits and decision-making paradigms. A stock-and-flow model integrated the data to quantify costs and benefits of conventional vs. electric jeepney drivers. Results show that conventional jeepney drivers are unlikely to shift to electric vehicles if the projected take-home pay does not support daily expenses, despite the additional benefits of the modernized system including lower exposure to PM<sub>2.5</sub>. Of the daily wage scenarios tested, only the highest at Php 900/day met the threshold for drivers’ needs. The socio-economic feedback in terms of take-home pay dominated over the health and environmental feedback on worldviews. Understanding these stakeholder contexts and priorities is a crucial step towards building trust, co-developing interventions, and overcoming barriers to policy implementation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46989,"journal":{"name":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 101369"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A feedback-guided analysis of environmental, health and socio-economic factors affecting drivers’ willingness to shift to e-jeepneys\",\"authors\":\"C. Kendra Gotangco Gonzales ,&nbsp;Katrina Abenojar ,&nbsp;Carlos Rosauro Manalo ,&nbsp;Melliza Templonuevo Cruz ,&nbsp;Maria Obiminda Cambaliza ,&nbsp;James Bernard Simpas ,&nbsp;Imee Delos Reyes ,&nbsp;John Wong ,&nbsp;Bernell Go ,&nbsp;Krizelle Cleo Fowler ,&nbsp;Rene Marlon Panti ,&nbsp;Emma Porio ,&nbsp;Jean Jardeleza Mijares\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cstp.2025.101369\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The Jeepney Modernization Program involves the replacement of traditional jeepneys with more efficient alternatives, including modern enclosed electric vehicles, alongside operational improvements to the public transportation system. This study aims to assess the environmental, health and socio-economic factors impacting drivers’ willingness to shift to e-jeepneys. Feedback-Guided Analysis was used as a framework for designing an interdisciplinary approach towards understanding the decision-making paradigms of drivers plying a specific route in Quezon City, Metro Manila. Measurements of drivers’ exposure to PM<sub>2.5</sub> and associated health parameters were complemented by key informant interviews delving into income, expenses, valuation of benefits and decision-making paradigms. A stock-and-flow model integrated the data to quantify costs and benefits of conventional vs. electric jeepney drivers. Results show that conventional jeepney drivers are unlikely to shift to electric vehicles if the projected take-home pay does not support daily expenses, despite the additional benefits of the modernized system including lower exposure to PM<sub>2.5</sub>. Of the daily wage scenarios tested, only the highest at Php 900/day met the threshold for drivers’ needs. The socio-economic feedback in terms of take-home pay dominated over the health and environmental feedback on worldviews. Understanding these stakeholder contexts and priorities is a crucial step towards building trust, co-developing interventions, and overcoming barriers to policy implementation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Case Studies on Transport Policy\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101369\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Case Studies on Transport Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213624X25000069\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213624X25000069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

吉普尼现代化计划包括用更高效的替代品取代传统的吉普尼,包括现代封闭式电动汽车,同时改善公共交通系统的运营。本研究旨在评估影响司机转向电动吉普尼意愿的环境、健康和社会经济因素。反馈导向分析被用作设计跨学科方法的框架,以理解马尼拉大都会奎松市特定路线上司机的决策范式。对司机PM2.5暴露量和相关健康参数的测量,辅以深入研究收入、支出、效益评估和决策范式的关键信息提供者访谈。库存和流量模型整合了数据,量化了传统吉普尼与电动吉普尼司机的成本和收益。研究结果显示,如果预计的实得工资无法支撑日常开支,传统吉普尼司机不太可能转向电动汽车,尽管现代化的系统有额外的好处,包括降低PM2.5的暴露。在测试的日工资情景中,只有最高的900菲律宾比索/天符合司机需求的门槛。实得工资方面的社会经济反馈占主导地位,而世界观方面的健康和环境反馈占主导地位。了解这些利益攸关方的背景和优先事项是建立信任、共同制定干预措施和克服政策实施障碍的关键一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A feedback-guided analysis of environmental, health and socio-economic factors affecting drivers’ willingness to shift to e-jeepneys
The Jeepney Modernization Program involves the replacement of traditional jeepneys with more efficient alternatives, including modern enclosed electric vehicles, alongside operational improvements to the public transportation system. This study aims to assess the environmental, health and socio-economic factors impacting drivers’ willingness to shift to e-jeepneys. Feedback-Guided Analysis was used as a framework for designing an interdisciplinary approach towards understanding the decision-making paradigms of drivers plying a specific route in Quezon City, Metro Manila. Measurements of drivers’ exposure to PM2.5 and associated health parameters were complemented by key informant interviews delving into income, expenses, valuation of benefits and decision-making paradigms. A stock-and-flow model integrated the data to quantify costs and benefits of conventional vs. electric jeepney drivers. Results show that conventional jeepney drivers are unlikely to shift to electric vehicles if the projected take-home pay does not support daily expenses, despite the additional benefits of the modernized system including lower exposure to PM2.5. Of the daily wage scenarios tested, only the highest at Php 900/day met the threshold for drivers’ needs. The socio-economic feedback in terms of take-home pay dominated over the health and environmental feedback on worldviews. Understanding these stakeholder contexts and priorities is a crucial step towards building trust, co-developing interventions, and overcoming barriers to policy implementation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
12.00%
发文量
222
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书