比较阿达木单抗生物类似药在银屑病患者临床实践中的应用。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Domenico Giordano, Antonio Di Guardo, Annamaria Larosa, Andrea Vizzaccaro, Giulia Maretti, Federica Rega, Flavia Persechino, Nazareno Gagliostro, Severino Persechino
{"title":"比较阿达木单抗生物类似药在银屑病患者临床实践中的应用。","authors":"Domenico Giordano, Antonio Di Guardo, Annamaria Larosa, Andrea Vizzaccaro, Giulia Maretti, Federica Rega, Flavia Persechino, Nazareno Gagliostro, Severino Persechino","doi":"10.23736/S2784-8671.24.07914-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biologic drugs have revolutionized the treatment of psoriasis and other chronic inflammatory diseases. In recent years, numerous biosimilar molecules that target cytokines such as TNF-alpha or its receptors have been developed. The approval of biosimilars has made it possible to reduce the costs of biologic drugs, thereby increasing access to these therapies for more patients and enhancing psoriasis treatment globally. Imraldi and Idacio are both biosimilars of Adalimumab, approved for treating moderate to severe psoriasis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our study aims to compare these two adalimumab biosimilars in psoriasis patients who have previously undergone treatment with other biologic drugs or systemic therapy in a real-life setting. Our cohort comprised 32 psoriatic patients. Of these patients, 15 were prescribed Imraldi, while the remaining were on Idacio. To assess the efficacy of these therapies, we utilized various measures including the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, the Pruritus Visual Analog Scale, the Visual Analog Scale, the Dermatology Life Quality Index, and the Psoriasis Global Assessment, monitoring the patients over a 24-week period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our results indicated that the use of Idacio led to greater decreases in all scores compared to Imraldi. However, in terms of safety and efficacy, the two drugs were found to be comparable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings of this study support the efficacy and safety of Idacio and Imraldi in managing psoriasis, with Idacio demonstrating superior efficacy in reducing disease severity. Future studies could benefit from expanding the patient cohort and conducting further analyses to evaluate individual responses to treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":14526,"journal":{"name":"Italian Journal of Dermatology and Venereology","volume":"159 6","pages":"599-606"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing adalimumab biosimilars in the clinical practice of psoriatic patients.\",\"authors\":\"Domenico Giordano, Antonio Di Guardo, Annamaria Larosa, Andrea Vizzaccaro, Giulia Maretti, Federica Rega, Flavia Persechino, Nazareno Gagliostro, Severino Persechino\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S2784-8671.24.07914-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biologic drugs have revolutionized the treatment of psoriasis and other chronic inflammatory diseases. In recent years, numerous biosimilar molecules that target cytokines such as TNF-alpha or its receptors have been developed. The approval of biosimilars has made it possible to reduce the costs of biologic drugs, thereby increasing access to these therapies for more patients and enhancing psoriasis treatment globally. Imraldi and Idacio are both biosimilars of Adalimumab, approved for treating moderate to severe psoriasis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our study aims to compare these two adalimumab biosimilars in psoriasis patients who have previously undergone treatment with other biologic drugs or systemic therapy in a real-life setting. Our cohort comprised 32 psoriatic patients. Of these patients, 15 were prescribed Imraldi, while the remaining were on Idacio. To assess the efficacy of these therapies, we utilized various measures including the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, the Pruritus Visual Analog Scale, the Visual Analog Scale, the Dermatology Life Quality Index, and the Psoriasis Global Assessment, monitoring the patients over a 24-week period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our results indicated that the use of Idacio led to greater decreases in all scores compared to Imraldi. However, in terms of safety and efficacy, the two drugs were found to be comparable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings of this study support the efficacy and safety of Idacio and Imraldi in managing psoriasis, with Idacio demonstrating superior efficacy in reducing disease severity. Future studies could benefit from expanding the patient cohort and conducting further analyses to evaluate individual responses to treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14526,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Italian Journal of Dermatology and Venereology\",\"volume\":\"159 6\",\"pages\":\"599-606\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Italian Journal of Dermatology and Venereology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2784-8671.24.07914-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Italian Journal of Dermatology and Venereology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2784-8671.24.07914-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:生物药物已经彻底改变了银屑病和其他慢性炎症性疾病的治疗。近年来,许多靶向细胞因子(如tnf - α或其受体)的生物类似物分子被开发出来。生物仿制药的批准使得降低生物药物的成本成为可能,从而增加了更多患者获得这些疗法的机会,并加强了全球牛皮癣的治疗。Imraldi和Idacio都是阿达木单抗的生物仿制药,被批准用于治疗中度至重度牛皮癣。方法:我们的研究旨在比较这两种阿达木单抗生物类似药在现实生活中接受过其他生物药物治疗或全身治疗的银屑病患者中的疗效。我们的队列包括32名银屑病患者。在这些患者中,15人服用Imraldi,其余患者服用Idacio。为了评估这些疗法的疗效,我们使用了多种测量方法,包括银屑病面积和严重程度指数、瘙痒视觉模拟量表、视觉模拟量表、皮肤病生活质量指数和银屑病整体评估,对患者进行了24周的监测。结果:我们的结果表明,与Imraldi相比,使用Idacio导致所有评分的下降幅度更大。然而,在安全性和有效性方面,这两种药物被发现是相当的。结论:本研究结果支持Idacio和Imraldi治疗银屑病的有效性和安全性,其中Idacio在降低疾病严重程度方面表现出更强的疗效。未来的研究可以从扩大患者队列和进行进一步的分析来评估个体对治疗的反应中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing adalimumab biosimilars in the clinical practice of psoriatic patients.

Background: Biologic drugs have revolutionized the treatment of psoriasis and other chronic inflammatory diseases. In recent years, numerous biosimilar molecules that target cytokines such as TNF-alpha or its receptors have been developed. The approval of biosimilars has made it possible to reduce the costs of biologic drugs, thereby increasing access to these therapies for more patients and enhancing psoriasis treatment globally. Imraldi and Idacio are both biosimilars of Adalimumab, approved for treating moderate to severe psoriasis.

Methods: Our study aims to compare these two adalimumab biosimilars in psoriasis patients who have previously undergone treatment with other biologic drugs or systemic therapy in a real-life setting. Our cohort comprised 32 psoriatic patients. Of these patients, 15 were prescribed Imraldi, while the remaining were on Idacio. To assess the efficacy of these therapies, we utilized various measures including the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, the Pruritus Visual Analog Scale, the Visual Analog Scale, the Dermatology Life Quality Index, and the Psoriasis Global Assessment, monitoring the patients over a 24-week period.

Results: Our results indicated that the use of Idacio led to greater decreases in all scores compared to Imraldi. However, in terms of safety and efficacy, the two drugs were found to be comparable.

Conclusions: The findings of this study support the efficacy and safety of Idacio and Imraldi in managing psoriasis, with Idacio demonstrating superior efficacy in reducing disease severity. Future studies could benefit from expanding the patient cohort and conducting further analyses to evaluate individual responses to treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
442
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信