发展精神分裂症药物治疗的EPA指南-德尔菲过程的结果。

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Peter Falkai, Elias Wagner, Miriam John, Vladislav Yakimov, Silvana Galderisi, Istvan Bitter, Geert Dom, Andrea Schmitt, Wolfgang Gaebel, Bernardo Carpiniello, Alkomiet Hasan
{"title":"发展精神分裂症药物治疗的EPA指南-德尔菲过程的结果。","authors":"Peter Falkai, Elias Wagner, Miriam John, Vladislav Yakimov, Silvana Galderisi, Istvan Bitter, Geert Dom, Andrea Schmitt, Wolfgang Gaebel, Bernardo Carpiniello, Alkomiet Hasan","doi":"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The development of guidelines is time-consuming and cost-intensive. The heterogeneity of clinical practice, evidence, and patients' needs is an issue across Europe. An European core guidance for a specific psychiatric disorder may help to overcome this issue. Here, we present a progress report on the European Psychiatric Association (EPA) proof-of-concept approach to develop a European consensus guidance on the pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All national psychiatric associations in Europe were contacted to provide their schizophrenia guidelines. Six guidelines were rated by three experts, experienced in the development of national and international guidelines, from three different countries (Italy, Hungary, and Germany), and the German schizophrenia guideline published in 2019 was found to have the highest quality. For this proof-of-concept approach, 45 recommendations on the pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia from the German guideline were evaluated in a two-step Delphi process to determine their acceptability throughout the European continent.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>44 experts participated in the first round and 40 experts in the second round of the Delphi process. Agreement among the involved experts was reached for 75% of the presented recommendations from the German schizophrenia guidelines. 11 out of 45 recommendations (24.4%) did not reach this level of agreement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This progress report highlights the possibility of developing a pan-European core guidance on the pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia by adapting national guidelines and reconciling their recommendations. However, several barriers in this adaptation process, such as non-agreement in recommendations with strong scientific evidence in the reconciling process, were identified and must be considered when developing the final guidance.</p>","PeriodicalId":12155,"journal":{"name":"European Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"e26"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11883772/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing the EPA guidance of pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia - results of a Delphi process.\",\"authors\":\"Peter Falkai, Elias Wagner, Miriam John, Vladislav Yakimov, Silvana Galderisi, Istvan Bitter, Geert Dom, Andrea Schmitt, Wolfgang Gaebel, Bernardo Carpiniello, Alkomiet Hasan\",\"doi\":\"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1794\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The development of guidelines is time-consuming and cost-intensive. The heterogeneity of clinical practice, evidence, and patients' needs is an issue across Europe. An European core guidance for a specific psychiatric disorder may help to overcome this issue. Here, we present a progress report on the European Psychiatric Association (EPA) proof-of-concept approach to develop a European consensus guidance on the pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All national psychiatric associations in Europe were contacted to provide their schizophrenia guidelines. Six guidelines were rated by three experts, experienced in the development of national and international guidelines, from three different countries (Italy, Hungary, and Germany), and the German schizophrenia guideline published in 2019 was found to have the highest quality. For this proof-of-concept approach, 45 recommendations on the pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia from the German guideline were evaluated in a two-step Delphi process to determine their acceptability throughout the European continent.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>44 experts participated in the first round and 40 experts in the second round of the Delphi process. Agreement among the involved experts was reached for 75% of the presented recommendations from the German schizophrenia guidelines. 11 out of 45 recommendations (24.4%) did not reach this level of agreement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This progress report highlights the possibility of developing a pan-European core guidance on the pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia by adapting national guidelines and reconciling their recommendations. However, several barriers in this adaptation process, such as non-agreement in recommendations with strong scientific evidence in the reconciling process, were identified and must be considered when developing the final guidance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12155,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11883772/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1794\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1794","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:指南的制定是耗时和成本密集的。临床实践、证据和患者需求的异质性是整个欧洲的一个问题。针对特定精神疾病的欧洲核心指南可能有助于克服这一问题。在这里,我们提出了一份关于欧洲精神病学协会(EPA)概念验证方法的进展报告,以制定精神分裂症药物治疗的欧洲共识指南。方法:联系了欧洲所有国家精神病学协会,以提供他们的精神分裂症指南。来自三个不同国家(意大利、匈牙利和德国)的三名在制定国家和国际指南方面经验丰富的专家对六份指南进行了评级,发现2019年发布的德国精神分裂症指南质量最高。对于这种概念验证方法,在两步德尔菲过程中评估了德国指南中关于精神分裂症药物治疗的45项建议,以确定其在整个欧洲大陆的可接受性。结果:第一轮共有44位专家参与,第二轮共有40位专家参与。参与研究的专家对德国精神分裂症指南中75%的建议达成了一致。45条建议中有11条(24.4%)没有达到这一一致水平。结论:本进展报告强调了通过调整国家指南并协调其建议来制定精神分裂症药理学治疗泛欧核心指南的可能性。然而,在这一适应过程中发现了一些障碍,例如在协调过程中对具有强有力科学证据的建议不一致,这些障碍在制定最终指南时必须加以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Developing the EPA guidance of pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia - results of a Delphi process.

Developing the EPA guidance of pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia - results of a Delphi process.

Developing the EPA guidance of pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia - results of a Delphi process.

Background: The development of guidelines is time-consuming and cost-intensive. The heterogeneity of clinical practice, evidence, and patients' needs is an issue across Europe. An European core guidance for a specific psychiatric disorder may help to overcome this issue. Here, we present a progress report on the European Psychiatric Association (EPA) proof-of-concept approach to develop a European consensus guidance on the pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia.

Methods: All national psychiatric associations in Europe were contacted to provide their schizophrenia guidelines. Six guidelines were rated by three experts, experienced in the development of national and international guidelines, from three different countries (Italy, Hungary, and Germany), and the German schizophrenia guideline published in 2019 was found to have the highest quality. For this proof-of-concept approach, 45 recommendations on the pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia from the German guideline were evaluated in a two-step Delphi process to determine their acceptability throughout the European continent.

Results: 44 experts participated in the first round and 40 experts in the second round of the Delphi process. Agreement among the involved experts was reached for 75% of the presented recommendations from the German schizophrenia guidelines. 11 out of 45 recommendations (24.4%) did not reach this level of agreement.

Conclusions: This progress report highlights the possibility of developing a pan-European core guidance on the pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia by adapting national guidelines and reconciling their recommendations. However, several barriers in this adaptation process, such as non-agreement in recommendations with strong scientific evidence in the reconciling process, were identified and must be considered when developing the final guidance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Psychiatry
European Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
3.80%
发文量
2338
审稿时长
4.5 weeks
期刊介绍: European Psychiatry, the official journal of the European Psychiatric Association, is dedicated to sharing cutting-edge research, policy updates, and fostering dialogue among clinicians, researchers, and patient advocates in the fields of psychiatry, mental health, behavioral science, and neuroscience. This peer-reviewed, Open Access journal strives to publish the latest advancements across various mental health issues, including diagnostic and treatment breakthroughs, as well as advancements in understanding the biological foundations of mental, behavioral, and cognitive functions in both clinical and general population studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信