超越残疾:发育性残疾患者生活质量的科学计量学回顾。

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Riccardo Cavallaro , Alessandro Carollo , Giulia Balboni , Laura E. Gómez , Dagmara Dimitriou , Gianluca Esposito
{"title":"超越残疾:发育性残疾患者生活质量的科学计量学回顾。","authors":"Riccardo Cavallaro ,&nbsp;Alessandro Carollo ,&nbsp;Giulia Balboni ,&nbsp;Laura E. Gómez ,&nbsp;Dagmara Dimitriou ,&nbsp;Gianluca Esposito","doi":"10.1016/j.ridd.2025.104919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Quality of Life (QoL) is a crucial concept that pertains to an individual’s perception of their position in life. In the context of developmental disabilities, QoL is pivotal for improving evidence-based practices, providing support and organizing services for individuals, thereby enabling them to achieve their potential with dignity and equality. Despite its importance, QoL has often not been the primary focus in many studies on developmental disabilities and remains less developed compared to other research areas. This study aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the existing knowledge in this thematic area. A document co-citation analysis was conducted to identify the most impactful publications and main thematic domains of research in the literature (<em>N</em> = 2141 documents and their 97,547 citations). A total of 21 impactful documents were identified, most of which focused on issues related to the conceptualization and assessment of QoL. Nine major thematic domains of research were outlined. In line with the impactful publications, some research themes focused on conceptual issues (e.g., self-reported QoL and QoL reported from others) and assessment approaches. Furthermore, the literature has transitioned towards broadening the QoL perspective in the context of family and social systems. The study provides an overview of how QoL has been studied in the context of developmental disabilities, highlighting the interdependence of individuals, families, and communities in ensuring a fulfilling life through the lens of QoL.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51351,"journal":{"name":"Research in Developmental Disabilities","volume":"158 ","pages":"Article 104919"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond disability: A scientometric review of quality of life in developmental disabilities\",\"authors\":\"Riccardo Cavallaro ,&nbsp;Alessandro Carollo ,&nbsp;Giulia Balboni ,&nbsp;Laura E. Gómez ,&nbsp;Dagmara Dimitriou ,&nbsp;Gianluca Esposito\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ridd.2025.104919\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Quality of Life (QoL) is a crucial concept that pertains to an individual’s perception of their position in life. In the context of developmental disabilities, QoL is pivotal for improving evidence-based practices, providing support and organizing services for individuals, thereby enabling them to achieve their potential with dignity and equality. Despite its importance, QoL has often not been the primary focus in many studies on developmental disabilities and remains less developed compared to other research areas. This study aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the existing knowledge in this thematic area. A document co-citation analysis was conducted to identify the most impactful publications and main thematic domains of research in the literature (<em>N</em> = 2141 documents and their 97,547 citations). A total of 21 impactful documents were identified, most of which focused on issues related to the conceptualization and assessment of QoL. Nine major thematic domains of research were outlined. In line with the impactful publications, some research themes focused on conceptual issues (e.g., self-reported QoL and QoL reported from others) and assessment approaches. Furthermore, the literature has transitioned towards broadening the QoL perspective in the context of family and social systems. The study provides an overview of how QoL has been studied in the context of developmental disabilities, highlighting the interdependence of individuals, families, and communities in ensuring a fulfilling life through the lens of QoL.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Developmental Disabilities\",\"volume\":\"158 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104919\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Developmental Disabilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0891422225000034\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Developmental Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0891422225000034","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生活质量(QoL)是一个重要的概念,它关系到一个人对自己在生活中的地位的感知。在发育性残疾的背景下,生活质量对于改进循证实践、为个人提供支持和组织服务,从而使他们能够有尊严和平等地发挥潜力至关重要。尽管生活质量很重要,但它往往不是许多发育障碍研究的主要焦点,与其他研究领域相比,生活质量仍然欠发达。本研究旨在对这一主题领域的现有知识提供一个全面的了解。通过文献共被引分析,确定文献中最具影响力的出版物和研究的主要主题领域(N = 2141篇文献及其97,547次引用)。共确定了21份有影响的文件,其中大部分侧重于与生活质量的概念化和评估有关的问题。概述了九个主要专题研究领域。与有影响力的出版物一致,一些研究主题侧重于概念性问题(例如,自我报告的生活质量和他人报告的生活质量)和评估方法。此外,文献已转向拓宽生活质量视角在家庭和社会制度的背景下。该研究概述了如何在发育性残疾的背景下研究生活质量,强调了个人、家庭和社区在通过生活质量来确保充实生活方面的相互依存关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond disability: A scientometric review of quality of life in developmental disabilities
Quality of Life (QoL) is a crucial concept that pertains to an individual’s perception of their position in life. In the context of developmental disabilities, QoL is pivotal for improving evidence-based practices, providing support and organizing services for individuals, thereby enabling them to achieve their potential with dignity and equality. Despite its importance, QoL has often not been the primary focus in many studies on developmental disabilities and remains less developed compared to other research areas. This study aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the existing knowledge in this thematic area. A document co-citation analysis was conducted to identify the most impactful publications and main thematic domains of research in the literature (N = 2141 documents and their 97,547 citations). A total of 21 impactful documents were identified, most of which focused on issues related to the conceptualization and assessment of QoL. Nine major thematic domains of research were outlined. In line with the impactful publications, some research themes focused on conceptual issues (e.g., self-reported QoL and QoL reported from others) and assessment approaches. Furthermore, the literature has transitioned towards broadening the QoL perspective in the context of family and social systems. The study provides an overview of how QoL has been studied in the context of developmental disabilities, highlighting the interdependence of individuals, families, and communities in ensuring a fulfilling life through the lens of QoL.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
178
期刊介绍: Research In Developmental Disabilities is aimed at publishing original research of an interdisciplinary nature that has a direct bearing on the remediation of problems associated with developmental disabilities. Manuscripts will be solicited throughout the world. Articles will be primarily empirical studies, although an occasional position paper or review will be accepted. The aim of the journal will be to publish articles on all aspects of research with the developmentally disabled, with any methodologically sound approach being acceptable.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信