重症监护病房脓毒症和感染性休克危重患者SCAI休克分期的验证

IF 0.9 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Osama Mukhtar, Amos Lal, Jacob Jentzer, Kianoush Kashani
{"title":"重症监护病房脓毒症和感染性休克危重患者SCAI休克分期的验证","authors":"Osama Mukhtar, Amos Lal, Jacob Jentzer, Kianoush Kashani","doi":"10.55729/2000-9666.1436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluated the predictive value of SCAI shock staging for mortality in patients with sepsis and septic shock admitted to the medical ICU.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This is a single-center historical cohort study. We analyzed data for adults (≥18-year-old) admitted to the medical ICU at Mayo Clinic St. Mary's campus with sepsis between June 1, 2018, and December 31, 2021. Sepsis was identified using the Sepsis-III criteria. Patients were stratified based on SCAI shock staging. Our primary outcome was all-cause 30-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 3079 eligible adult patients with sepsis or septic shock. The distribution of SCAI shock stages A through E was 9%, 12%, 25%, 49%, and 5%, respectively. The overall 30-day mortality was 24%. There was progression in all outcomes including ICU, hospital and 30-day mortality across SCAI shock stages. However, only SCAI shock stages D and E, had statistically significant adjusted HRs of 1.6 and 3, respectively. When compared to SOFA score, SCAI shock staging performed similarly in predicting ICU mortality with no statistically significant difference in AUCs, <i>p</i>-value of 0.07.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results support the use of SCAI shock staging in critically ill medical patients with sepsis and septic shock for risk stratification. We propose that the SCAI shock staging may be used as a universal system for grading the severity of shock in critically ill patients regardless of etiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":15460,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives","volume":"15 1","pages":"13-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11759074/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of SCAI Shock Staging in Critically Ill Medical Intensive Care Unit Patients With Sepsis and Septic Shock.\",\"authors\":\"Osama Mukhtar, Amos Lal, Jacob Jentzer, Kianoush Kashani\",\"doi\":\"10.55729/2000-9666.1436\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluated the predictive value of SCAI shock staging for mortality in patients with sepsis and septic shock admitted to the medical ICU.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This is a single-center historical cohort study. We analyzed data for adults (≥18-year-old) admitted to the medical ICU at Mayo Clinic St. Mary's campus with sepsis between June 1, 2018, and December 31, 2021. Sepsis was identified using the Sepsis-III criteria. Patients were stratified based on SCAI shock staging. Our primary outcome was all-cause 30-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 3079 eligible adult patients with sepsis or septic shock. The distribution of SCAI shock stages A through E was 9%, 12%, 25%, 49%, and 5%, respectively. The overall 30-day mortality was 24%. There was progression in all outcomes including ICU, hospital and 30-day mortality across SCAI shock stages. However, only SCAI shock stages D and E, had statistically significant adjusted HRs of 1.6 and 3, respectively. When compared to SOFA score, SCAI shock staging performed similarly in predicting ICU mortality with no statistically significant difference in AUCs, <i>p</i>-value of 0.07.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results support the use of SCAI shock staging in critically ill medical patients with sepsis and septic shock for risk stratification. We propose that the SCAI shock staging may be used as a universal system for grading the severity of shock in critically ill patients regardless of etiology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"13-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11759074/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55729/2000-9666.1436\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55729/2000-9666.1436","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究评估SCAI休克分期对重症监护病房脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者死亡率的预测价值。材料和方法:这是一项单中心历史队列研究。我们分析了2018年6月1日至2021年12月31日期间梅奥诊所圣玛丽校区ICU收治的脓毒症成人(≥18岁)的数据。脓毒症的诊断采用脓毒症- iii标准。根据SCAI休克分期对患者进行分层。我们的主要结局是全因30天死亡率。结果:我们确定了3079例符合条件的脓毒症或感染性休克成年患者。SCAI休克阶段A至E的分布分别为9%、12%、25%、49%和5%。总体30天死亡率为24%。SCAI休克各阶段的所有结局均有进展,包括ICU、住院和30天死亡率。然而,只有SCAI休克D期和E期的调整后hr分别为1.6和3,具有统计学意义。与SOFA评分相比,SCAI休克分期预测ICU死亡率的效果相似,auc无统计学差异,p值为0.07。结论:我们的研究结果支持将SCAI休克分期用于脓毒症和脓毒性休克危重患者的风险分层。我们建议SCAI休克分期可作为一种通用系统,用于对危重患者休克严重程度进行分级,而不考虑病因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of SCAI Shock Staging in Critically Ill Medical Intensive Care Unit Patients With Sepsis and Septic Shock.

Purpose: This study evaluated the predictive value of SCAI shock staging for mortality in patients with sepsis and septic shock admitted to the medical ICU.

Materials and methods: This is a single-center historical cohort study. We analyzed data for adults (≥18-year-old) admitted to the medical ICU at Mayo Clinic St. Mary's campus with sepsis between June 1, 2018, and December 31, 2021. Sepsis was identified using the Sepsis-III criteria. Patients were stratified based on SCAI shock staging. Our primary outcome was all-cause 30-day mortality.

Results: We identified 3079 eligible adult patients with sepsis or septic shock. The distribution of SCAI shock stages A through E was 9%, 12%, 25%, 49%, and 5%, respectively. The overall 30-day mortality was 24%. There was progression in all outcomes including ICU, hospital and 30-day mortality across SCAI shock stages. However, only SCAI shock stages D and E, had statistically significant adjusted HRs of 1.6 and 3, respectively. When compared to SOFA score, SCAI shock staging performed similarly in predicting ICU mortality with no statistically significant difference in AUCs, p-value of 0.07.

Conclusions: Our results support the use of SCAI shock staging in critically ill medical patients with sepsis and septic shock for risk stratification. We propose that the SCAI shock staging may be used as a universal system for grading the severity of shock in critically ill patients regardless of etiology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
106
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: JCHIMP provides: up-to-date information in the field of Internal Medicine to community hospital medical professionals a platform for clinical faculty, residents, and medical students to publish research relevant to community hospital programs. Manuscripts that explore aspects of medicine at community hospitals welcome, including but not limited to: the best practices of community academic programs community hospital-based research opinion and insight from community hospital leadership and faculty the scholarly work of residents and medical students affiliated with community hospitals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信