腹式呼吸运动控制胃食管反流病的有效性:一项随机对照试验。

IF 0.9 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Maryam Sadiq, M Shazan Raza, Noman Sadiq, Anum Sadiq, Muniba Zafar, Syed Muhammad B Zaidi, Saima Ambreen
{"title":"腹式呼吸运动控制胃食管反流病的有效性:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Maryam Sadiq, M Shazan Raza, Noman Sadiq, Anum Sadiq, Muniba Zafar, Syed Muhammad B Zaidi, Saima Ambreen","doi":"10.55729/2000-9666.1438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the effect of actively training the crura of diaphragm which is a part of lower esophageal sphincter using abdominal breathing exercises to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>With a randomized controlled study design, a total of 22 (11 in each group) clinically diagnosed patients of GERD presenting to the gastroenterology outpatient department at Holy Family Hospital in Pakistan were assessed using GERD related \"quality of life index (QoLI)\" questionnaire and their on-demand proton pump inhibitors (PPI) usage. Single blinding technique will be used. Patients ages 18-60 years with GERD were included. However, those with hiatal hernia > 2 cm, previous surgeries on LES and those with who could not undergo the breathing exercise training were excluded. The data was collected via interviews. The intervention group was trained to do a 5-min breathing exercise and advised to perform it 5 times a day for 4 continuous weeks. On demand PPI usage was self-recorded. The control group was also trained to perform a breathing exercise that had no effect on LES and was asked to self-record on demand PPI usage. After 4 weeks the data was collected from both groups and compared quality-of-life index and PPI usage. Data was retrieved and analyzed using SPSS version 22. Descriptive analysis was used for describing the study variables. Paired t-test was used for in group comparison before and after intervention and independent t test was used for between group comparison, p value of <0.05 was taken as significant. Mean PPI usage of the two groups was also compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An improved QoLI and reduced PPI usage was seen in the intervention group as compared to control group. Paired t test confirmed a statistically significant difference, but the independent t test did not. Linear regression test showed that F (1,20) = 32.822, p = 0.000. Adjusted R value is 0.603. y = 13.182x +2.812. The beta value is 0.789 and p value is 0.000.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study concludes that abdominal breathing exercises can improve the GERD symptoms as assessed by QoLI score and on demand PPI usage. It advocates for an alternative treatment option for GERD patients that is more efficacious as compared to no breathing exercises and has less potential side effect as compared to continuous PPI use, enabling us to lead our way towards revolution in medicine providing more effective and less invasive treatment options to facilitate our patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":15460,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives","volume":"15 1","pages":"30-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11759073/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Abdominal Breathing Exercise to Control Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, a Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Maryam Sadiq, M Shazan Raza, Noman Sadiq, Anum Sadiq, Muniba Zafar, Syed Muhammad B Zaidi, Saima Ambreen\",\"doi\":\"10.55729/2000-9666.1438\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the effect of actively training the crura of diaphragm which is a part of lower esophageal sphincter using abdominal breathing exercises to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>With a randomized controlled study design, a total of 22 (11 in each group) clinically diagnosed patients of GERD presenting to the gastroenterology outpatient department at Holy Family Hospital in Pakistan were assessed using GERD related \\\"quality of life index (QoLI)\\\" questionnaire and their on-demand proton pump inhibitors (PPI) usage. Single blinding technique will be used. Patients ages 18-60 years with GERD were included. However, those with hiatal hernia > 2 cm, previous surgeries on LES and those with who could not undergo the breathing exercise training were excluded. The data was collected via interviews. The intervention group was trained to do a 5-min breathing exercise and advised to perform it 5 times a day for 4 continuous weeks. On demand PPI usage was self-recorded. The control group was also trained to perform a breathing exercise that had no effect on LES and was asked to self-record on demand PPI usage. After 4 weeks the data was collected from both groups and compared quality-of-life index and PPI usage. Data was retrieved and analyzed using SPSS version 22. Descriptive analysis was used for describing the study variables. Paired t-test was used for in group comparison before and after intervention and independent t test was used for between group comparison, p value of <0.05 was taken as significant. Mean PPI usage of the two groups was also compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An improved QoLI and reduced PPI usage was seen in the intervention group as compared to control group. Paired t test confirmed a statistically significant difference, but the independent t test did not. Linear regression test showed that F (1,20) = 32.822, p = 0.000. Adjusted R value is 0.603. y = 13.182x +2.812. The beta value is 0.789 and p value is 0.000.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study concludes that abdominal breathing exercises can improve the GERD symptoms as assessed by QoLI score and on demand PPI usage. It advocates for an alternative treatment option for GERD patients that is more efficacious as compared to no breathing exercises and has less potential side effect as compared to continuous PPI use, enabling us to lead our way towards revolution in medicine providing more effective and less invasive treatment options to facilitate our patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"30-35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11759073/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55729/2000-9666.1438\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55729/2000-9666.1438","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨腹式呼吸练习积极训练食管下括约肌膈脚对胃食管反流病的治疗效果。方法:采用随机对照研究设计,采用与胃食管反流相关的“生活质量指数(QoLI)”问卷及其按需质子泵抑制剂(PPI)使用情况对22例(每组11例)在巴基斯坦圣家医院消化科门诊就诊的临床诊断为胃食管反流的患者进行评估。将采用单盲法。纳入年龄在18-60岁的胃食管反流患者。然而,那些有裂孔疝超过20厘米,以前的LES手术和那些不能接受呼吸运动训练的人被排除在外。数据是通过访谈收集的。干预组接受5分钟呼吸练习的训练,并建议每天进行5次,连续4周。按需PPI使用情况是自行记录的。对照组也接受了对LES无影响的呼吸练习训练,并被要求按需自行记录PPI的使用情况。4周后收集两组数据,比较生活质量指数和PPI使用情况。数据的检索和分析使用SPSS版本22。采用描述性分析对研究变量进行描述。干预前后组内比较采用配对t检验,组间比较采用独立t检验,结果p值:干预组QoLI较对照组改善,PPI使用率较对照组降低。配对t检验证实差异有统计学意义,但独立t检验无统计学意义。线性回归检验显示,F (1,20) = 32.822, p = 0.000。调整后的R值为0.603。Y = 13.182x +2.812。beta值为0.789,p值为0.000。结论:通过QoLI评分和按需使用PPI评估,本研究得出腹式呼吸练习可以改善胃食管反流症状。它提倡为胃食管反流患者提供一种替代治疗方案,与不进行呼吸练习相比,这种治疗方案更有效,与持续使用PPI相比,潜在的副作用更小,使我们能够引领医学革命,为患者提供更有效、侵入性更小的治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of Abdominal Breathing Exercise to Control Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Objectives: To determine the effect of actively training the crura of diaphragm which is a part of lower esophageal sphincter using abdominal breathing exercises to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Methodology: With a randomized controlled study design, a total of 22 (11 in each group) clinically diagnosed patients of GERD presenting to the gastroenterology outpatient department at Holy Family Hospital in Pakistan were assessed using GERD related "quality of life index (QoLI)" questionnaire and their on-demand proton pump inhibitors (PPI) usage. Single blinding technique will be used. Patients ages 18-60 years with GERD were included. However, those with hiatal hernia > 2 cm, previous surgeries on LES and those with who could not undergo the breathing exercise training were excluded. The data was collected via interviews. The intervention group was trained to do a 5-min breathing exercise and advised to perform it 5 times a day for 4 continuous weeks. On demand PPI usage was self-recorded. The control group was also trained to perform a breathing exercise that had no effect on LES and was asked to self-record on demand PPI usage. After 4 weeks the data was collected from both groups and compared quality-of-life index and PPI usage. Data was retrieved and analyzed using SPSS version 22. Descriptive analysis was used for describing the study variables. Paired t-test was used for in group comparison before and after intervention and independent t test was used for between group comparison, p value of <0.05 was taken as significant. Mean PPI usage of the two groups was also compared.

Results: An improved QoLI and reduced PPI usage was seen in the intervention group as compared to control group. Paired t test confirmed a statistically significant difference, but the independent t test did not. Linear regression test showed that F (1,20) = 32.822, p = 0.000. Adjusted R value is 0.603. y = 13.182x +2.812. The beta value is 0.789 and p value is 0.000.

Conclusion: The study concludes that abdominal breathing exercises can improve the GERD symptoms as assessed by QoLI score and on demand PPI usage. It advocates for an alternative treatment option for GERD patients that is more efficacious as compared to no breathing exercises and has less potential side effect as compared to continuous PPI use, enabling us to lead our way towards revolution in medicine providing more effective and less invasive treatment options to facilitate our patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
106
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: JCHIMP provides: up-to-date information in the field of Internal Medicine to community hospital medical professionals a platform for clinical faculty, residents, and medical students to publish research relevant to community hospital programs. Manuscripts that explore aspects of medicine at community hospitals welcome, including but not limited to: the best practices of community academic programs community hospital-based research opinion and insight from community hospital leadership and faculty the scholarly work of residents and medical students affiliated with community hospitals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信