护理学生和教师在护理教育中使用人工智能的态度、感知和行为意图:一项综合综述。

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Nursing Education Perspectives Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000001372
Mollie Ostick, Bette Mariani, Catherine Lovecchio, Helene Moriarty
{"title":"护理学生和教师在护理教育中使用人工智能的态度、感知和行为意图:一项综合综述。","authors":"Mollie Ostick, Bette Mariani, Catherine Lovecchio, Helene Moriarty","doi":"10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000001372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This integrative review critiques and synthesizes current research on nursing faculty and students' attitudes, perceptions, and behavioral intentions toward artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools in nursing education.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>AI's rapid integration into health care offers transformative potential in nursing across clinical care, education, policy, and research.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Following Whittemore and Knafl's methodology, Pubmed, CINAHL, and ERIC were searched for studies written in English assessing attitudes, perceptions, and behavioral intentions of nursing students and faculty regarding AI use in nursing education.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six quantitative studies encompassing 2,430 participants across five countries were included. They revealed generally positive attitudes toward the use of AI in nursing education. Only one study included faculty.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A logical next step is to compare and contrast student and faculty perceptions of using AI. Generative AI tools must be studied within nursing education to allow for informed integration and the development of appropriate training programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":47651,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Education Perspectives","volume":" ","pages":"E7-E11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nursing Student and Faculty Attitudes, Perceptions, and Behavioral Intentions of Artificial Intelligence Use in Nursing Education: An Integrative Review.\",\"authors\":\"Mollie Ostick, Bette Mariani, Catherine Lovecchio, Helene Moriarty\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000001372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This integrative review critiques and synthesizes current research on nursing faculty and students' attitudes, perceptions, and behavioral intentions toward artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools in nursing education.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>AI's rapid integration into health care offers transformative potential in nursing across clinical care, education, policy, and research.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Following Whittemore and Knafl's methodology, Pubmed, CINAHL, and ERIC were searched for studies written in English assessing attitudes, perceptions, and behavioral intentions of nursing students and faculty regarding AI use in nursing education.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six quantitative studies encompassing 2,430 participants across five countries were included. They revealed generally positive attitudes toward the use of AI in nursing education. Only one study included faculty.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A logical next step is to compare and contrast student and faculty perceptions of using AI. Generative AI tools must be studied within nursing education to allow for informed integration and the development of appropriate training programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Education Perspectives\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"E7-E11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Education Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000001372\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Education Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000001372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:这篇综合综述对护理教师和学生对护理教育中基于人工智能(AI)的工具的态度、感知和行为意图的当前研究进行了批评和综合。背景:人工智能迅速融入医疗保健领域,为临床护理、教育、政策和研究等护理领域提供了变革潜力。方法:遵循Whittemore和Knafl的方法,检索Pubmed、CINAHL和ERIC的英文研究,评估护理学生和教师在护理教育中使用人工智能的态度、观念和行为意图。结果:六项定量研究包括五个国家的2430名参与者。他们对在护理教育中使用人工智能普遍持积极态度。只有一项研究包括了教员。结论:合乎逻辑的下一步是比较和对比学生和教师对使用人工智能的看法。必须在护理教育中研究生成式人工智能工具,以便进行知情整合和制定适当的培训计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nursing Student and Faculty Attitudes, Perceptions, and Behavioral Intentions of Artificial Intelligence Use in Nursing Education: An Integrative Review.

Aim: This integrative review critiques and synthesizes current research on nursing faculty and students' attitudes, perceptions, and behavioral intentions toward artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools in nursing education.

Background: AI's rapid integration into health care offers transformative potential in nursing across clinical care, education, policy, and research.

Method: Following Whittemore and Knafl's methodology, Pubmed, CINAHL, and ERIC were searched for studies written in English assessing attitudes, perceptions, and behavioral intentions of nursing students and faculty regarding AI use in nursing education.

Results: Six quantitative studies encompassing 2,430 participants across five countries were included. They revealed generally positive attitudes toward the use of AI in nursing education. Only one study included faculty.

Conclusion: A logical next step is to compare and contrast student and faculty perceptions of using AI. Generative AI tools must be studied within nursing education to allow for informed integration and the development of appropriate training programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Education Perspectives
Nursing Education Perspectives EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
197
期刊介绍: A publication of the National League for Nursing, Nursing Education Perspectives is a peer-reviewed, bimonthly journal that provides evidence for best practices in nursing education. Through the publication of rigorously designed studies, the journal contributes to the advancement of the science of nursing education. It serves as a forum for research and innovation regarding teaching and learning, curricula, technology, and other issues important to nursing education. Today, as nurse educators strive to advance research in nursing education and break away from established patterns and chart new pathways in nursing education, Nursing Education Perspectives is a vital resource. Nursing Education Perspectives is housed in the NLN Chamberlain College of Nursing for the Advancement of the Science of Nursing Education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信