九项回避/限制性食物摄入障碍筛查(NIAS)按年龄和报告状态的测量不变性:比较自我报告的成人和青少年与儿童和青少年父母报告的ARFID症状

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Wesley R Barnhart, Liv Hog, Michael J Zickar, Jessica H Baker, Lisa Dinkler, Jerry Guintivano, Jessica S Johnson, Casey MacDermod, Melissa Munn-Chernoff, Nadia Micali, Shelby Ortiz, Emily M Pisetsky, Jennifer P White, Cynthia M Bulik, Laura M Thornton
{"title":"九项回避/限制性食物摄入障碍筛查(NIAS)按年龄和报告状态的测量不变性:比较自我报告的成人和青少年与儿童和青少年父母报告的ARFID症状","authors":"Wesley R Barnhart, Liv Hog, Michael J Zickar, Jessica H Baker, Lisa Dinkler, Jerry Guintivano, Jessica S Johnson, Casey MacDermod, Melissa Munn-Chernoff, Nadia Micali, Shelby Ortiz, Emily M Pisetsky, Jennifer P White, Cynthia M Bulik, Laura M Thornton","doi":"10.1002/eat.24381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Self-report measures of ARFID symptoms (e.g., Nine-Item Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder Screen [NIAS]) are used to assess symptom differences between groups. Measurement invariance techniques clarify if groups interpret a measure similarly, providing a foundation for examining group differences. Considering age and reporter status (e.g., parent vs. self-report), we investigated measurement invariance of the NIAS in (1) self-reporting adults vs. adolescents; (2) parent reports on children vs. adolescents; and (3) parent reports on adolescents vs. adolescent self-report. If measurement invariance was supported, we examined symptom differences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were from the ARFID Genes and Environment (ARFID-GEN) project.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Self-reporting adults vs. adolescents and parent reports of adolescents vs. adolescent self-report interpreted the NIAS similarly (measurement invariance was supported). Measurement invariance was not supported in parent reports on children vs. adolescents. Self-reporting adults reported higher appetite scores (i.e., lower appetite) than self-reporting adolescents at the subscale and item level on the NIAS. Although no subscales differences were identified between parent reports on adolescents and adolescent self-reports, parents reported more picky eating and lower appetite in adolescents than self-reporting adolescents at the item level on the NIAS.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Findings support using the NIAS to measure symptom differences in self-reporting adults vs. adolescents and in parent reports of adolescents vs. adolescent self-reports. Findings may be leveraged by researchers interested in maturational effects of ARFID symptoms in adolescents and adults via self-reports on the NIAS and clinicians interested in tracking the convergence of parent and adolescent NIAS reports while undergoing treatment for ARFID.</p>","PeriodicalId":51067,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measurement Invariance on the Nine-Item Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder Screen (NIAS) by Age and Reporter Status: Comparing ARFID Symptoms Among Self-Reporting Adults and Adolescents and Parent Reports of Children and Adolescents.\",\"authors\":\"Wesley R Barnhart, Liv Hog, Michael J Zickar, Jessica H Baker, Lisa Dinkler, Jerry Guintivano, Jessica S Johnson, Casey MacDermod, Melissa Munn-Chernoff, Nadia Micali, Shelby Ortiz, Emily M Pisetsky, Jennifer P White, Cynthia M Bulik, Laura M Thornton\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/eat.24381\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Self-report measures of ARFID symptoms (e.g., Nine-Item Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder Screen [NIAS]) are used to assess symptom differences between groups. Measurement invariance techniques clarify if groups interpret a measure similarly, providing a foundation for examining group differences. Considering age and reporter status (e.g., parent vs. self-report), we investigated measurement invariance of the NIAS in (1) self-reporting adults vs. adolescents; (2) parent reports on children vs. adolescents; and (3) parent reports on adolescents vs. adolescent self-report. If measurement invariance was supported, we examined symptom differences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were from the ARFID Genes and Environment (ARFID-GEN) project.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Self-reporting adults vs. adolescents and parent reports of adolescents vs. adolescent self-report interpreted the NIAS similarly (measurement invariance was supported). Measurement invariance was not supported in parent reports on children vs. adolescents. Self-reporting adults reported higher appetite scores (i.e., lower appetite) than self-reporting adolescents at the subscale and item level on the NIAS. Although no subscales differences were identified between parent reports on adolescents and adolescent self-reports, parents reported more picky eating and lower appetite in adolescents than self-reporting adolescents at the item level on the NIAS.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Findings support using the NIAS to measure symptom differences in self-reporting adults vs. adolescents and in parent reports of adolescents vs. adolescent self-reports. Findings may be leveraged by researchers interested in maturational effects of ARFID symptoms in adolescents and adults via self-reports on the NIAS and clinicians interested in tracking the convergence of parent and adolescent NIAS reports while undergoing treatment for ARFID.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Eating Disorders\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Eating Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24381\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24381","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:ARFID症状的自我报告测量(例如,九项回避/限制性食物摄入障碍筛查[NIAS])用于评估组间症状差异。测量不变性技术澄清了群体对测量的解释是否相似,为检验群体差异提供了基础。考虑到年龄和报告者状态(例如,父母与自我报告),我们调查了NIAS在(1)自我报告的成年人与青少年中的测量不变性;(2)儿童与青少年家长报告;(3)青少年父母报告与青少年自我报告。如果支持测量不变性,我们检查症状差异。方法:数据来源于ARFID基因与环境(ARFID- gen)项目。结果:成人自我报告与青少年、青少年父母报告与青少年自我报告对NIAS的解释相似(支持测量不变性)。在儿童与青少年的父母报告中不支持测量不变性。在NIAS的子量表和项目水平上,自我报告的成年人报告的食欲得分比自我报告的青少年高(即食欲低)。虽然在青少年父母报告和青少年自我报告之间没有发现亚量表差异,但在NIAS的项目水平上,父母报告的青少年比自我报告的青少年更挑食,食欲更低。讨论:研究结果支持使用NIAS来测量自我报告的成年人与青少年以及青少年父母报告与青少年自我报告的症状差异。对ARFID症状在青少年和成人中的成熟效应感兴趣的研究人员可以通过NIAS的自我报告,以及对追踪父母和青少年在接受ARFID治疗时NIAS报告的趋同感兴趣的临床医生利用这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measurement Invariance on the Nine-Item Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder Screen (NIAS) by Age and Reporter Status: Comparing ARFID Symptoms Among Self-Reporting Adults and Adolescents and Parent Reports of Children and Adolescents.

Objective: Self-report measures of ARFID symptoms (e.g., Nine-Item Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder Screen [NIAS]) are used to assess symptom differences between groups. Measurement invariance techniques clarify if groups interpret a measure similarly, providing a foundation for examining group differences. Considering age and reporter status (e.g., parent vs. self-report), we investigated measurement invariance of the NIAS in (1) self-reporting adults vs. adolescents; (2) parent reports on children vs. adolescents; and (3) parent reports on adolescents vs. adolescent self-report. If measurement invariance was supported, we examined symptom differences.

Methods: Data were from the ARFID Genes and Environment (ARFID-GEN) project.

Results: Self-reporting adults vs. adolescents and parent reports of adolescents vs. adolescent self-report interpreted the NIAS similarly (measurement invariance was supported). Measurement invariance was not supported in parent reports on children vs. adolescents. Self-reporting adults reported higher appetite scores (i.e., lower appetite) than self-reporting adolescents at the subscale and item level on the NIAS. Although no subscales differences were identified between parent reports on adolescents and adolescent self-reports, parents reported more picky eating and lower appetite in adolescents than self-reporting adolescents at the item level on the NIAS.

Discussion: Findings support using the NIAS to measure symptom differences in self-reporting adults vs. adolescents and in parent reports of adolescents vs. adolescent self-reports. Findings may be leveraged by researchers interested in maturational effects of ARFID symptoms in adolescents and adults via self-reports on the NIAS and clinicians interested in tracking the convergence of parent and adolescent NIAS reports while undergoing treatment for ARFID.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
12.70%
发文量
204
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Articles featured in the journal describe state-of-the-art scientific research on theory, methodology, etiology, clinical practice, and policy related to eating disorders, as well as contributions that facilitate scholarly critique and discussion of science and practice in the field. Theoretical and empirical work on obesity or healthy eating falls within the journal’s scope inasmuch as it facilitates the advancement of efforts to describe and understand, prevent, or treat eating disorders. IJED welcomes submissions from all regions of the world and representing all levels of inquiry (including basic science, clinical trials, implementation research, and dissemination studies), and across a full range of scientific methods, disciplines, and approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信