葡萄牙农村与城市环境中的药物使用风险:在进步的药物政策设置中减少危害的挑战。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Marta Sofia de Sousa Pinto, Cristiana Vale Pires, Helena Maria Ribeiro Moura de Carvalho, Catarina Pinto Pereira, Gabriela Almeida Pinto da Silva, Ludmila de Jesus Grilo Carapinha, Filipa Oliveira Gonçalves, Helena Valente
{"title":"葡萄牙农村与城市环境中的药物使用风险:在进步的药物政策设置中减少危害的挑战。","authors":"Marta Sofia de Sousa Pinto, Cristiana Vale Pires, Helena Maria Ribeiro Moura de Carvalho, Catarina Pinto Pereira, Gabriela Almeida Pinto da Silva, Ludmila de Jesus Grilo Carapinha, Filipa Oliveira Gonçalves, Helena Valente","doi":"10.1080/02791072.2025.2449913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Portugal is commonly recognized as one of the best drug policy examples in the world. Nonetheless, contrasts between drug use risks in rural vs urban settings in the country is an understudied topic, even if its specific challenges are commonly affirmed, both by professionals and people who use drugs (PWUD). The aim of this study was to compare rural and urban environments concerning socio-sanitary services availability; illegal drugs availability; risk behaviors related to drug use; stigma associated with illicit drug use; and social support. Additionally, specific harm reduction challenges and recommendations for improvement were explored. A qualitative study with two focus groups involving people who use drugs, outreach workers and local decision-makers was conducted. Distinct scenarios and challenges in both settings were found: In large cities, a significantly higher specialized service coverage than in rural areas was described. In rural settings, a higher number of drug-related risks, higher levels of stigma and lower availability of human and material resources were mentioned, although being associated with higher levels of informal social support and more proximal relationships with harm reduction teams. This study emphasizes the need for a harm reduction paradigm strongly focused on environmental risk determinants, as much as in individual ones.</p>","PeriodicalId":16902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychoactive drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drug use Risks in Portuguese Rural vs Urban Environments: Harm Reduction Challenges in a Progressive Drug Policy Setting.\",\"authors\":\"Marta Sofia de Sousa Pinto, Cristiana Vale Pires, Helena Maria Ribeiro Moura de Carvalho, Catarina Pinto Pereira, Gabriela Almeida Pinto da Silva, Ludmila de Jesus Grilo Carapinha, Filipa Oliveira Gonçalves, Helena Valente\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02791072.2025.2449913\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Portugal is commonly recognized as one of the best drug policy examples in the world. Nonetheless, contrasts between drug use risks in rural vs urban settings in the country is an understudied topic, even if its specific challenges are commonly affirmed, both by professionals and people who use drugs (PWUD). The aim of this study was to compare rural and urban environments concerning socio-sanitary services availability; illegal drugs availability; risk behaviors related to drug use; stigma associated with illicit drug use; and social support. Additionally, specific harm reduction challenges and recommendations for improvement were explored. A qualitative study with two focus groups involving people who use drugs, outreach workers and local decision-makers was conducted. Distinct scenarios and challenges in both settings were found: In large cities, a significantly higher specialized service coverage than in rural areas was described. In rural settings, a higher number of drug-related risks, higher levels of stigma and lower availability of human and material resources were mentioned, although being associated with higher levels of informal social support and more proximal relationships with harm reduction teams. This study emphasizes the need for a harm reduction paradigm strongly focused on environmental risk determinants, as much as in individual ones.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of psychoactive drugs\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of psychoactive drugs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2025.2449913\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychoactive drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2025.2449913","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

葡萄牙通常被认为是世界上禁毒政策最好的例子之一。尽管如此,尽管专业人员和吸毒者(PWUD)都普遍肯定了其具体挑战,但该国农村和城市环境中吸毒风险的对比仍是一个研究不足的主题。这项研究的目的是比较农村和城市环境中社会卫生服务的可得性;非法药物供应;与吸毒有关的危险行为;与非法药物使用有关的耻辱;还有社会支持。此外,还探讨了具体的减少危害挑战和改进建议。对涉及吸毒者、外联工作人员和地方决策者的两个焦点小组进行了定性研究。在这两种情况下都发现了不同的情况和挑战:在大城市,专业服务覆盖率明显高于农村地区。在农村环境中,提到了更多与毒品有关的风险、更高程度的耻辱和更少的人力和物质资源,尽管它们与更高水平的非正式社会支持和与减少伤害小组更近的关系有关。这项研究强调需要一个减少危害的范例,强烈关注环境风险决定因素,就像个人一样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Drug use Risks in Portuguese Rural vs Urban Environments: Harm Reduction Challenges in a Progressive Drug Policy Setting.

Portugal is commonly recognized as one of the best drug policy examples in the world. Nonetheless, contrasts between drug use risks in rural vs urban settings in the country is an understudied topic, even if its specific challenges are commonly affirmed, both by professionals and people who use drugs (PWUD). The aim of this study was to compare rural and urban environments concerning socio-sanitary services availability; illegal drugs availability; risk behaviors related to drug use; stigma associated with illicit drug use; and social support. Additionally, specific harm reduction challenges and recommendations for improvement were explored. A qualitative study with two focus groups involving people who use drugs, outreach workers and local decision-makers was conducted. Distinct scenarios and challenges in both settings were found: In large cities, a significantly higher specialized service coverage than in rural areas was described. In rural settings, a higher number of drug-related risks, higher levels of stigma and lower availability of human and material resources were mentioned, although being associated with higher levels of informal social support and more proximal relationships with harm reduction teams. This study emphasizes the need for a harm reduction paradigm strongly focused on environmental risk determinants, as much as in individual ones.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
62
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信