解决饮食失调未满足的需求需要系统性的改变和共同生产:对阿里等人(2024)的评论。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Agnes Ayton, James Downs, Ali Ibrahim
{"title":"解决饮食失调未满足的需求需要系统性的改变和共同生产:对阿里等人(2024)的评论。","authors":"Agnes Ayton, James Downs, Ali Ibrahim","doi":"10.1002/eat.24377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The treatment gap for eating disorders varies significantly across healthcare systems owing to structural, cultural, and systemic barriers. A recent systematic review by Ali et al. highlighted this disparity, with treatment rates ranging from 2.3% in some US populations to 65.7% in Switzerland, reflecting differences in methodology, healthcare funding, and accessibility. These gaps are exacerbated by inadequate primary care recognition, long waiting lists, and the prioritization of underweight cases, which marginalize individuals with higher body weights or complex comorbidities. Systemic barriers include fragmented care and insufficient interdisciplinary collaboration, especially for individuals with co-occurring conditions such as diabetes, other mental disorders, or neurodivergence. Variations in access to evidence-based treatment also disproportionately affect men, ethnic minorities, and those with newer diagnoses, where a lack of funding and expertise hampers effective intervention. Geographic inequities and reliance on out-of-pocket payments further limit access in some systems. Addressing these disparities requires systemic reforms, including improved training and funding, integrated treatment models, and public prevention programs. Embedding lived experience in research, service design, and policy development can ensure inclusive and culturally sensitive interventions. By targeting the unique challenges of each healthcare system, tailored approaches can reduce inequities, improve access to treatment and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51067,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addressing Unmet Needs in Eating Disorders Requires Systemic Change and Co-Production: A Commentary on Ali et al. (2024).\",\"authors\":\"Agnes Ayton, James Downs, Ali Ibrahim\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/eat.24377\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The treatment gap for eating disorders varies significantly across healthcare systems owing to structural, cultural, and systemic barriers. A recent systematic review by Ali et al. highlighted this disparity, with treatment rates ranging from 2.3% in some US populations to 65.7% in Switzerland, reflecting differences in methodology, healthcare funding, and accessibility. These gaps are exacerbated by inadequate primary care recognition, long waiting lists, and the prioritization of underweight cases, which marginalize individuals with higher body weights or complex comorbidities. Systemic barriers include fragmented care and insufficient interdisciplinary collaboration, especially for individuals with co-occurring conditions such as diabetes, other mental disorders, or neurodivergence. Variations in access to evidence-based treatment also disproportionately affect men, ethnic minorities, and those with newer diagnoses, where a lack of funding and expertise hampers effective intervention. Geographic inequities and reliance on out-of-pocket payments further limit access in some systems. Addressing these disparities requires systemic reforms, including improved training and funding, integrated treatment models, and public prevention programs. Embedding lived experience in research, service design, and policy development can ensure inclusive and culturally sensitive interventions. By targeting the unique challenges of each healthcare system, tailored approaches can reduce inequities, improve access to treatment and outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Eating Disorders\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Eating Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24377\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24377","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于结构性、文化和系统性障碍,饮食失调的治疗差距在医疗保健系统中差异很大。Ali等人最近的一项系统综述强调了这一差异,美国一些人群的治疗率从2.3%到瑞士的65.7%不等,反映了方法、医疗资金和可及性方面的差异。初级保健认识不足、候诊名单长以及优先考虑体重不足病例加剧了这些差距,使体重较高或有复杂合并症的个体被边缘化。系统性障碍包括支离破碎的护理和跨学科合作不足,特别是对于同时患有糖尿病、其他精神障碍或神经分化等疾病的个体。在获得循证治疗方面的差异也不成比例地影响到男性、少数民族和新诊断者,这些人缺乏资金和专业知识,阻碍了有效的干预。地域不平等和对自费支付的依赖进一步限制了某些系统的使用。解决这些差异需要进行系统性改革,包括改进培训和资金、综合治疗模式和公共预防规划。在研究、服务设计和政策制定中融入生活经验可以确保包容性和文化敏感性的干预措施。通过针对每个卫生保健系统的独特挑战,量身定制的方法可以减少不公平现象,改善获得治疗的机会和结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Addressing Unmet Needs in Eating Disorders Requires Systemic Change and Co-Production: A Commentary on Ali et al. (2024).

The treatment gap for eating disorders varies significantly across healthcare systems owing to structural, cultural, and systemic barriers. A recent systematic review by Ali et al. highlighted this disparity, with treatment rates ranging from 2.3% in some US populations to 65.7% in Switzerland, reflecting differences in methodology, healthcare funding, and accessibility. These gaps are exacerbated by inadequate primary care recognition, long waiting lists, and the prioritization of underweight cases, which marginalize individuals with higher body weights or complex comorbidities. Systemic barriers include fragmented care and insufficient interdisciplinary collaboration, especially for individuals with co-occurring conditions such as diabetes, other mental disorders, or neurodivergence. Variations in access to evidence-based treatment also disproportionately affect men, ethnic minorities, and those with newer diagnoses, where a lack of funding and expertise hampers effective intervention. Geographic inequities and reliance on out-of-pocket payments further limit access in some systems. Addressing these disparities requires systemic reforms, including improved training and funding, integrated treatment models, and public prevention programs. Embedding lived experience in research, service design, and policy development can ensure inclusive and culturally sensitive interventions. By targeting the unique challenges of each healthcare system, tailored approaches can reduce inequities, improve access to treatment and outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
12.70%
发文量
204
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Articles featured in the journal describe state-of-the-art scientific research on theory, methodology, etiology, clinical practice, and policy related to eating disorders, as well as contributions that facilitate scholarly critique and discussion of science and practice in the field. Theoretical and empirical work on obesity or healthy eating falls within the journal’s scope inasmuch as it facilitates the advancement of efforts to describe and understand, prevent, or treat eating disorders. IJED welcomes submissions from all regions of the world and representing all levels of inquiry (including basic science, clinical trials, implementation research, and dissemination studies), and across a full range of scientific methods, disciplines, and approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信