Christina Dyar, Elise Green, Isaac C Rhew, Christine M Lee
{"title":"按使用方式使用大麻的数量、频率和后果在事件水平上的差异:性少数群体妇女和性别多样化个体使用每种模式的频率差异的缓和。","authors":"Christina Dyar, Elise Green, Isaac C Rhew, Christine M Lee","doi":"10.15288/jsad.24-00348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A handful of studies have examined differences in the subjective effects and consequences of utilizing different modes of cannabis (e.g., smoking vs. vaping) at the daily level. However, results have been mixed and recent research suggests that there may be individual-level differences in these effects based on how often individuals use each mode. We aimed to determine within-person associations between mode of cannabis use (i.e., smoking, vaping plant material, vaping concentrates, dabbing, edibles, multiple modes) and quantity, subjective intoxication, consequences, contexts of cannabis use, and co-use with alcohol or tobacco varied based on how often individuals used each mode.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from a 30-day EMA study of cannabis use with 338 sexual minority women and gender diverse young adults assigned female at birth, populations at high risk for cannabis use disorder.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Several associations between mode of cannabis use and outcomes differed based on how frequently individuals used each mode. People who used edibles less frequently experienced more consequences when using edibles compared to smoking cannabis, while people who used edibles more frequently did not. People who used multiple modes more frequently took fewer hits when using multiple mode, while those who used multiple modes less frequently did not.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Analyses suggest that frequency, quantity, and consequences of some modes of use differed based on how frequently individuals used each mode. Further research is needed to identify protective behavioral strategies that may be utilized by individuals who use particular modes more often.</p>","PeriodicalId":17159,"journal":{"name":"Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Event-level differences in quantity, frequency, and consequences of cannabis use by modes of use: Moderation by differences in how often individuals use each mode among sexual minority women and gender diverse individuals.\",\"authors\":\"Christina Dyar, Elise Green, Isaac C Rhew, Christine M Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.15288/jsad.24-00348\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A handful of studies have examined differences in the subjective effects and consequences of utilizing different modes of cannabis (e.g., smoking vs. vaping) at the daily level. However, results have been mixed and recent research suggests that there may be individual-level differences in these effects based on how often individuals use each mode. We aimed to determine within-person associations between mode of cannabis use (i.e., smoking, vaping plant material, vaping concentrates, dabbing, edibles, multiple modes) and quantity, subjective intoxication, consequences, contexts of cannabis use, and co-use with alcohol or tobacco varied based on how often individuals used each mode.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from a 30-day EMA study of cannabis use with 338 sexual minority women and gender diverse young adults assigned female at birth, populations at high risk for cannabis use disorder.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Several associations between mode of cannabis use and outcomes differed based on how frequently individuals used each mode. People who used edibles less frequently experienced more consequences when using edibles compared to smoking cannabis, while people who used edibles more frequently did not. People who used multiple modes more frequently took fewer hits when using multiple mode, while those who used multiple modes less frequently did not.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Analyses suggest that frequency, quantity, and consequences of some modes of use differed based on how frequently individuals used each mode. Further research is needed to identify protective behavioral strategies that may be utilized by individuals who use particular modes more often.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.24-00348\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.24-00348","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Event-level differences in quantity, frequency, and consequences of cannabis use by modes of use: Moderation by differences in how often individuals use each mode among sexual minority women and gender diverse individuals.
Background: A handful of studies have examined differences in the subjective effects and consequences of utilizing different modes of cannabis (e.g., smoking vs. vaping) at the daily level. However, results have been mixed and recent research suggests that there may be individual-level differences in these effects based on how often individuals use each mode. We aimed to determine within-person associations between mode of cannabis use (i.e., smoking, vaping plant material, vaping concentrates, dabbing, edibles, multiple modes) and quantity, subjective intoxication, consequences, contexts of cannabis use, and co-use with alcohol or tobacco varied based on how often individuals used each mode.
Methods: We used data from a 30-day EMA study of cannabis use with 338 sexual minority women and gender diverse young adults assigned female at birth, populations at high risk for cannabis use disorder.
Results: Several associations between mode of cannabis use and outcomes differed based on how frequently individuals used each mode. People who used edibles less frequently experienced more consequences when using edibles compared to smoking cannabis, while people who used edibles more frequently did not. People who used multiple modes more frequently took fewer hits when using multiple mode, while those who used multiple modes less frequently did not.
Conclusions: Analyses suggest that frequency, quantity, and consequences of some modes of use differed based on how frequently individuals used each mode. Further research is needed to identify protective behavioral strategies that may be utilized by individuals who use particular modes more often.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs began in 1940 as the Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol. It was founded by Howard W. Haggard, M.D., director of Yale University’s Laboratory of Applied Physiology. Dr. Haggard was a physiologist studying the effects of alcohol on the body, and he started the Journal as a way to publish the increasing amount of research on alcohol use, abuse, and treatment that emerged from Yale and other institutions in the years following the repeal of Prohibition in 1933. In addition to original research, the Journal also published abstracts summarizing other published documents dealing with alcohol. At Yale, Dr. Haggard built a large team of alcohol researchers within the Laboratory of Applied Physiology—including E.M. Jellinek, who became managing editor of the Journal in 1941. In 1943, to bring together the various alcohol research projects conducted by the Laboratory, Dr. Haggard formed the Section of Studies on Alcohol, which also became home to the Journal and its editorial staff. In 1950, the Section was renamed the Center of Alcohol Studies.