吸光度是决定马兜铃酸I和马兜铃酸II毒性差异的重要因素

IF 5.7 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Hong-Ching Kwok, Hei-Tak Tse, Ka-Ki Ng, Shuangshuang Wang, Chun-Kit Au, Zongwei Cai, Wan Chan
{"title":"吸光度是决定马兜铃酸I和马兜铃酸II毒性差异的重要因素","authors":"Hong-Ching Kwok, Hei-Tak Tse, Ka-Ki Ng, Shuangshuang Wang, Chun-Kit Au, Zongwei Cai, Wan Chan","doi":"10.1021/acs.jafc.4c10765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inadvertent exposure to aristolochic acids (AAs) is causing chronic renal disease worldwide, with aristolochic acid I (AA-I) identified as the primary toxic agent. This study employed chemical methods to investigate the mechanisms underlying the nephrotoxicity and carcinogenicity of AA-I. Aristolochic acid II (AA-II), which has a structure similar to that of AA-I, was investigated with the same methods for comparison. Despite their structural similarities, findings from cultured human cells and gut sac experiments showed that AA-I is absorbed more effectively than AA-II (∼3 times greater for AA-I than for AA-II; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). This increased absorption, along with the previously observed higher activity of reductive activation enzymes for AA-I, results in greater DNA damage and oxidative stress, both of which are key factors in AA-related toxicity. The similar patterns of cell mortality (34.4 ± 2.3% vs 9.7 ± 0.1% for AA-I and AA-II at 80 μM; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001), DNA adduct formation (∼3 times greater for AA-I than for AA-II; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), and oxidative stress levels in relation to the concentrations of AA-I and AA-II indicate that the higher absorption rate of AA-I is a significant contributor to its greater toxicity. The toxicity of AA-I was also found to be further enhanced by its (natural) coexistence with AA-II. Since AA-I and AA-II differ only by a methoxy group, future research on reducing risks associated with AA exposure should focus on strategies to lower the absorption of these compounds.","PeriodicalId":41,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry","volume":"74 6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Absorptivity Is an Important Determinant in the Toxicity Difference between Aristolochic Acid I and Aristolochic Acid II\",\"authors\":\"Hong-Ching Kwok, Hei-Tak Tse, Ka-Ki Ng, Shuangshuang Wang, Chun-Kit Au, Zongwei Cai, Wan Chan\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.jafc.4c10765\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Inadvertent exposure to aristolochic acids (AAs) is causing chronic renal disease worldwide, with aristolochic acid I (AA-I) identified as the primary toxic agent. This study employed chemical methods to investigate the mechanisms underlying the nephrotoxicity and carcinogenicity of AA-I. Aristolochic acid II (AA-II), which has a structure similar to that of AA-I, was investigated with the same methods for comparison. Despite their structural similarities, findings from cultured human cells and gut sac experiments showed that AA-I is absorbed more effectively than AA-II (∼3 times greater for AA-I than for AA-II; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). This increased absorption, along with the previously observed higher activity of reductive activation enzymes for AA-I, results in greater DNA damage and oxidative stress, both of which are key factors in AA-related toxicity. The similar patterns of cell mortality (34.4 ± 2.3% vs 9.7 ± 0.1% for AA-I and AA-II at 80 μM; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001), DNA adduct formation (∼3 times greater for AA-I than for AA-II; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), and oxidative stress levels in relation to the concentrations of AA-I and AA-II indicate that the higher absorption rate of AA-I is a significant contributor to its greater toxicity. The toxicity of AA-I was also found to be further enhanced by its (natural) coexistence with AA-II. Since AA-I and AA-II differ only by a methoxy group, future research on reducing risks associated with AA exposure should focus on strategies to lower the absorption of these compounds.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"74 6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.4c10765\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.4c10765","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

无意中暴露于马兜铃酸(AAs)在世界范围内引起慢性肾脏疾病,马兜铃酸I (AA-I)被确定为主要毒性物质。本研究采用化学方法探讨了AA-I的肾毒性和致癌性机制。采用相同的方法对结构与AA-I相似的马兜铃酸II (AA-II)进行了比较研究。尽管它们的结构相似,但培养的人类细胞和肠囊实验的结果表明,AA-I比AA-II更有效地被吸收(AA-I比AA-II高~ 3倍;p & lt;0.001)。这种吸收的增加,加上之前观察到的AA-I还原活化酶活性的提高,导致更大的DNA损伤和氧化应激,这两者都是aa相关毒性的关键因素。AA-I和AA-II在80 μM下细胞死亡率相似(分别为34.4±2.3%和9.7±0.1%);p & lt;0.0001), DNA加合物的形成(AA-I比AA-II高~ 3倍;p & lt;0.001),氧化应激水平与AA-I和AA-II浓度的关系表明,较高的AA-I吸收率是其毒性更大的重要因素。AA-I与AA-II的(自然)共存进一步增强了其毒性。由于AA- i和AA- ii仅在甲氧基上有所不同,未来关于降低AA暴露相关风险的研究应侧重于降低这些化合物吸收的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Absorptivity Is an Important Determinant in the Toxicity Difference between Aristolochic Acid I and Aristolochic Acid II

Absorptivity Is an Important Determinant in the Toxicity Difference between Aristolochic Acid I and Aristolochic Acid II
Inadvertent exposure to aristolochic acids (AAs) is causing chronic renal disease worldwide, with aristolochic acid I (AA-I) identified as the primary toxic agent. This study employed chemical methods to investigate the mechanisms underlying the nephrotoxicity and carcinogenicity of AA-I. Aristolochic acid II (AA-II), which has a structure similar to that of AA-I, was investigated with the same methods for comparison. Despite their structural similarities, findings from cultured human cells and gut sac experiments showed that AA-I is absorbed more effectively than AA-II (∼3 times greater for AA-I than for AA-II; p < 0.001). This increased absorption, along with the previously observed higher activity of reductive activation enzymes for AA-I, results in greater DNA damage and oxidative stress, both of which are key factors in AA-related toxicity. The similar patterns of cell mortality (34.4 ± 2.3% vs 9.7 ± 0.1% for AA-I and AA-II at 80 μM; p < 0.0001), DNA adduct formation (∼3 times greater for AA-I than for AA-II; p < 0.001), and oxidative stress levels in relation to the concentrations of AA-I and AA-II indicate that the higher absorption rate of AA-I is a significant contributor to its greater toxicity. The toxicity of AA-I was also found to be further enhanced by its (natural) coexistence with AA-II. Since AA-I and AA-II differ only by a methoxy group, future research on reducing risks associated with AA exposure should focus on strategies to lower the absorption of these compounds.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
8.20%
发文量
1375
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry publishes high-quality, cutting edge original research representing complete studies and research advances dealing with the chemistry and biochemistry of agriculture and food. The Journal also encourages papers with chemistry and/or biochemistry as a major component combined with biological/sensory/nutritional/toxicological evaluation related to agriculture and/or food.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信