体重耻辱感对外行人和医疗保健专业人员饮食失调误诊的影响

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Natalia Garcia Moreno, D Catherine Walker, Nathalie Gullo, Conor J O'Dea
{"title":"体重耻辱感对外行人和医疗保健专业人员饮食失调误诊的影响","authors":"Natalia Garcia Moreno, D Catherine Walker, Nathalie Gullo, Conor J O'Dea","doi":"10.1002/eat.24374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There is limited research on weight bias in diagnosing eating disorders (EDs), particularly among healthcare professionals (HCPs). This is especially true for atypical anorexia nervosa, a diagnosis recently described in the DSM that includes people with anorexia nervosa symptoms who are not clinically underweight.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Using a within-subjects design, we assessed diagnosis, diagnostic confidence, and ED-related medical knowledge among a sample of lay people and medical professionals. Participants read three clinical vignettes (counterbalanced to avoid order effects) of a woman with anorexia nervosa or atypical anorexia nervosa (described as obese) and were assessed on weight stigma and prior ED medical knowledge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both lay people and HCPs were less likely to diagnose atypical anorexia nervosa and were less confident in that diagnosis than in the anorexia nervosa vignette condition. Lay participants' diagnostic bias, but not HCPs', was impacted by weight stigma; HCPs' confidence was impacted by weight stigma. In both cases, participants high in weight stigma were more accurate (lay sample) or more confident (HCPs) in diagnoses. Last, greater ED medical knowledge improved accuracy of diagnosis of vignette cases for the HCP sample that included snowball sample recruitment and CloudResearch participants and lay people, but not for the HCP sample recruited via snowball sampling only.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These findings highlight the urgency for more public awareness and training for HCPs emphasizing that people of all sizes can present with restrictive eating disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":51067,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Weight Stigma's Effects on Misdiagnosis of Eating Disorders Among Laypeople and Healthcare Professionals.\",\"authors\":\"Natalia Garcia Moreno, D Catherine Walker, Nathalie Gullo, Conor J O'Dea\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/eat.24374\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There is limited research on weight bias in diagnosing eating disorders (EDs), particularly among healthcare professionals (HCPs). This is especially true for atypical anorexia nervosa, a diagnosis recently described in the DSM that includes people with anorexia nervosa symptoms who are not clinically underweight.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Using a within-subjects design, we assessed diagnosis, diagnostic confidence, and ED-related medical knowledge among a sample of lay people and medical professionals. Participants read three clinical vignettes (counterbalanced to avoid order effects) of a woman with anorexia nervosa or atypical anorexia nervosa (described as obese) and were assessed on weight stigma and prior ED medical knowledge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both lay people and HCPs were less likely to diagnose atypical anorexia nervosa and were less confident in that diagnosis than in the anorexia nervosa vignette condition. Lay participants' diagnostic bias, but not HCPs', was impacted by weight stigma; HCPs' confidence was impacted by weight stigma. In both cases, participants high in weight stigma were more accurate (lay sample) or more confident (HCPs) in diagnoses. Last, greater ED medical knowledge improved accuracy of diagnosis of vignette cases for the HCP sample that included snowball sample recruitment and CloudResearch participants and lay people, but not for the HCP sample recruited via snowball sampling only.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These findings highlight the urgency for more public awareness and training for HCPs emphasizing that people of all sizes can present with restrictive eating disorders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Eating Disorders\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Eating Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24374\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24374","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:关于体重偏差在诊断饮食失调(EDs)中的研究有限,特别是在医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)中。对于非典型神经性厌食症来说尤其如此,这是DSM最近描述的一种诊断,包括有神经性厌食症症状但临床上没有体重过轻的人。方法:采用受试者内设计,我们评估了诊断、诊断置信度和ed相关医学知识在外行人和医疗专业人员的样本中。参与者阅读了三篇神经性厌食症或非典型神经性厌食症(被描述为肥胖)女性的临床小短文(平衡以避免顺序效应),并评估了体重耻辱感和先前的ED医学知识。结果:与神经性厌食症小症状相比,非专业人员和HCPs诊断非典型神经性厌食症的可能性更小,并且对该诊断的信心更低。非专业参与者的诊断偏倚受到体重污名的影响,而非HCPs的;医务人员的信心受到体重耻辱感的影响。在这两种情况下,高体重污名的参与者在诊断中更准确(普通样本)或更自信(HCPs)。最后,更多的ED医学知识提高了HCP样本(包括雪球样本招募和CloudResearch参与者和非专业人员)小病例诊断的准确性,但仅通过雪球样本招募的HCP样本没有提高诊断的准确性。讨论:这些发现强调了提高公众意识和培训卫生保健专业人员的紧迫性,强调了各种体型的人都可能出现限制性饮食失调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Weight Stigma's Effects on Misdiagnosis of Eating Disorders Among Laypeople and Healthcare Professionals.

Objective: There is limited research on weight bias in diagnosing eating disorders (EDs), particularly among healthcare professionals (HCPs). This is especially true for atypical anorexia nervosa, a diagnosis recently described in the DSM that includes people with anorexia nervosa symptoms who are not clinically underweight.

Method: Using a within-subjects design, we assessed diagnosis, diagnostic confidence, and ED-related medical knowledge among a sample of lay people and medical professionals. Participants read three clinical vignettes (counterbalanced to avoid order effects) of a woman with anorexia nervosa or atypical anorexia nervosa (described as obese) and were assessed on weight stigma and prior ED medical knowledge.

Results: Both lay people and HCPs were less likely to diagnose atypical anorexia nervosa and were less confident in that diagnosis than in the anorexia nervosa vignette condition. Lay participants' diagnostic bias, but not HCPs', was impacted by weight stigma; HCPs' confidence was impacted by weight stigma. In both cases, participants high in weight stigma were more accurate (lay sample) or more confident (HCPs) in diagnoses. Last, greater ED medical knowledge improved accuracy of diagnosis of vignette cases for the HCP sample that included snowball sample recruitment and CloudResearch participants and lay people, but not for the HCP sample recruited via snowball sampling only.

Discussion: These findings highlight the urgency for more public awareness and training for HCPs emphasizing that people of all sizes can present with restrictive eating disorders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
12.70%
发文量
204
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Articles featured in the journal describe state-of-the-art scientific research on theory, methodology, etiology, clinical practice, and policy related to eating disorders, as well as contributions that facilitate scholarly critique and discussion of science and practice in the field. Theoretical and empirical work on obesity or healthy eating falls within the journal’s scope inasmuch as it facilitates the advancement of efforts to describe and understand, prevent, or treat eating disorders. IJED welcomes submissions from all regions of the world and representing all levels of inquiry (including basic science, clinical trials, implementation research, and dissemination studies), and across a full range of scientific methods, disciplines, and approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信