实证管理研究中控制变量的选择:因果图如何为决策提供信息

IF 9.1 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Paul Hünermund , Beyers Louw , Mikko Rönkkö
{"title":"实证管理研究中控制变量的选择:因果图如何为决策提供信息","authors":"Paul Hünermund ,&nbsp;Beyers Louw ,&nbsp;Mikko Rönkkö","doi":"10.1016/j.leaqua.2024.101845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Leadership Quarterly and the management community more broadly prioritize identifying causal relationships to inform effective leadership practices. Despite the availability of more refined causal identification strategies, such as instrumental variables or natural experiments, control variables remain a common strategy in leadership research. The current literature generally agrees that control variables should be chosen based on theory and that these choices should be reported transparently. However, the literature provides little guidance on how specifically potential controls can be identified, how many control variables should be used, and whether a potential control variable should be included. Consequently, the current empirical literature is not fully transparent on how controls are selected and may be contaminated with bad controls that compromise causal inference. Causal diagrams provide a transparent framework to address these issues. This article introduces causal diagrams for leadership and management researchers and presents a workflow for finding an appropriate set of control variables.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48434,"journal":{"name":"Leadership Quarterly","volume":"36 2","pages":"Article 101845"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The choice of control variables in empirical management research: How causal diagrams can inform the decision\",\"authors\":\"Paul Hünermund ,&nbsp;Beyers Louw ,&nbsp;Mikko Rönkkö\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.leaqua.2024.101845\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The Leadership Quarterly and the management community more broadly prioritize identifying causal relationships to inform effective leadership practices. Despite the availability of more refined causal identification strategies, such as instrumental variables or natural experiments, control variables remain a common strategy in leadership research. The current literature generally agrees that control variables should be chosen based on theory and that these choices should be reported transparently. However, the literature provides little guidance on how specifically potential controls can be identified, how many control variables should be used, and whether a potential control variable should be included. Consequently, the current empirical literature is not fully transparent on how controls are selected and may be contaminated with bad controls that compromise causal inference. Causal diagrams provide a transparent framework to address these issues. This article introduces causal diagrams for leadership and management researchers and presents a workflow for finding an appropriate set of control variables.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Leadership Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"36 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 101845\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Leadership Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1048984324000742\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leadership Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1048984324000742","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《领导力季刊》和管理社区更广泛地优先确定因果关系,为有效的领导实践提供信息。尽管有更精细的因果识别策略,如工具变量或自然实验,控制变量仍然是领导力研究中的常用策略。目前的文献普遍认为控制变量的选择应该基于理论,这些选择应该透明地报告。然而,对于如何具体识别潜在的控制,应该使用多少控制变量,以及是否应该包括潜在的控制变量,文献提供的指导很少。因此,目前的经验文献在如何选择控制方面并不完全透明,并且可能受到损害因果推理的不良控制的污染。因果关系图为解决这些问题提供了一个透明的框架。本文为领导和管理研究人员介绍了因果关系图,并提出了一个寻找适当控制变量集的工作流程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The choice of control variables in empirical management research: How causal diagrams can inform the decision
The Leadership Quarterly and the management community more broadly prioritize identifying causal relationships to inform effective leadership practices. Despite the availability of more refined causal identification strategies, such as instrumental variables or natural experiments, control variables remain a common strategy in leadership research. The current literature generally agrees that control variables should be chosen based on theory and that these choices should be reported transparently. However, the literature provides little guidance on how specifically potential controls can be identified, how many control variables should be used, and whether a potential control variable should be included. Consequently, the current empirical literature is not fully transparent on how controls are selected and may be contaminated with bad controls that compromise causal inference. Causal diagrams provide a transparent framework to address these issues. This article introduces causal diagrams for leadership and management researchers and presents a workflow for finding an appropriate set of control variables.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
9.30%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The Leadership Quarterly is a social-science journal dedicated to advancing our understanding of leadership as a phenomenon, how to study it, as well as its practical implications. Leadership Quarterly seeks contributions from various disciplinary perspectives, including psychology broadly defined (i.e., industrial-organizational, social, evolutionary, biological, differential), management (i.e., organizational behavior, strategy, organizational theory), political science, sociology, economics (i.e., personnel, behavioral, labor), anthropology, history, and methodology.Equally desirable are contributions from multidisciplinary perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信