Tracy T Smith, Amy E Wahlquist, Theodore L Wagener, K Michael Cummings, Matthew J Carpenter
{"title":"非烟草电子烟调味剂对电子烟吸收、减少吸烟和戒烟的影响:一项全国性临床试验的二次分析。","authors":"Tracy T Smith, Amy E Wahlquist, Theodore L Wagener, K Michael Cummings, Matthew J Carpenter","doi":"10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The impact of e-cigarette flavoring on e-cigarette uptake and switching to e-cigarettes among adults who smoke is critical to e-cigarette regulation in the United Sates. The purpose of this secondary analysis was to assess the impact of e-cigarette flavoring choice on e-cigarette uptake and changes in cigarette smoking in a large nationwide trial of e-cigarette provision in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A free four-week supply of e-cigarettes was provided with minimal instructions to use to adults who smoke (N = 427). Participants selected from five flavor options: tobacco, menthol, blue/blackberry (one flavor), apple melon, or iced fruit. Participants could choose up to two flavors for each of two, two-week provisions of e-cigarettes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants who received an e-cigarette were 52 % female, 32 % non-white, and smoked an average (SD) of 14.8 (7.2) cigarettes per day at baseline. Only 5 % (n = 22) of participants chose to exclusively receive tobacco flavor. Compared to participants who exclusively received the tobacco flavor, participants who received any other flavor combination had greater e-cigarette uptake at the end of product provision (74 % vs. 55 %), were more likely to reduce cigarette smoking by at least 50 % at the end of product provision (34 % vs. 14 %) and at the final 6-month follow up (29 % vs. 5 %), and numerically, but not statistically, more likely to be abstinent from cigarettes at the end of product provision (11 % vs. 5 %) and the final 6-month follow-up (14 % vs. 5 %).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results suggest that non-tobacco e-cigarette flavors may be more appealing than tobacco flavors, and better promote uptake of e-cigarettes and cigarette smoking reduction. Large-scale randomized trials in which participants are assigned to either tobacco or non-tobacco flavors are critical.</p>","PeriodicalId":93857,"journal":{"name":"Addictive behaviors","volume":"163 ","pages":"108240"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of non-tobacco e-cigarette flavoring on e-cigarette uptake, cigarette smoking reduction, and cessation: A secondary analysis of a nationwide clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Tracy T Smith, Amy E Wahlquist, Theodore L Wagener, K Michael Cummings, Matthew J Carpenter\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108240\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The impact of e-cigarette flavoring on e-cigarette uptake and switching to e-cigarettes among adults who smoke is critical to e-cigarette regulation in the United Sates. The purpose of this secondary analysis was to assess the impact of e-cigarette flavoring choice on e-cigarette uptake and changes in cigarette smoking in a large nationwide trial of e-cigarette provision in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A free four-week supply of e-cigarettes was provided with minimal instructions to use to adults who smoke (N = 427). Participants selected from five flavor options: tobacco, menthol, blue/blackberry (one flavor), apple melon, or iced fruit. Participants could choose up to two flavors for each of two, two-week provisions of e-cigarettes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants who received an e-cigarette were 52 % female, 32 % non-white, and smoked an average (SD) of 14.8 (7.2) cigarettes per day at baseline. Only 5 % (n = 22) of participants chose to exclusively receive tobacco flavor. Compared to participants who exclusively received the tobacco flavor, participants who received any other flavor combination had greater e-cigarette uptake at the end of product provision (74 % vs. 55 %), were more likely to reduce cigarette smoking by at least 50 % at the end of product provision (34 % vs. 14 %) and at the final 6-month follow up (29 % vs. 5 %), and numerically, but not statistically, more likely to be abstinent from cigarettes at the end of product provision (11 % vs. 5 %) and the final 6-month follow-up (14 % vs. 5 %).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results suggest that non-tobacco e-cigarette flavors may be more appealing than tobacco flavors, and better promote uptake of e-cigarettes and cigarette smoking reduction. Large-scale randomized trials in which participants are assigned to either tobacco or non-tobacco flavors are critical.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Addictive behaviors\",\"volume\":\"163 \",\"pages\":\"108240\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Addictive behaviors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108240\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addictive behaviors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The impact of non-tobacco e-cigarette flavoring on e-cigarette uptake, cigarette smoking reduction, and cessation: A secondary analysis of a nationwide clinical trial.
Introduction: The impact of e-cigarette flavoring on e-cigarette uptake and switching to e-cigarettes among adults who smoke is critical to e-cigarette regulation in the United Sates. The purpose of this secondary analysis was to assess the impact of e-cigarette flavoring choice on e-cigarette uptake and changes in cigarette smoking in a large nationwide trial of e-cigarette provision in the United States.
Methods: A free four-week supply of e-cigarettes was provided with minimal instructions to use to adults who smoke (N = 427). Participants selected from five flavor options: tobacco, menthol, blue/blackberry (one flavor), apple melon, or iced fruit. Participants could choose up to two flavors for each of two, two-week provisions of e-cigarettes.
Results: Participants who received an e-cigarette were 52 % female, 32 % non-white, and smoked an average (SD) of 14.8 (7.2) cigarettes per day at baseline. Only 5 % (n = 22) of participants chose to exclusively receive tobacco flavor. Compared to participants who exclusively received the tobacco flavor, participants who received any other flavor combination had greater e-cigarette uptake at the end of product provision (74 % vs. 55 %), were more likely to reduce cigarette smoking by at least 50 % at the end of product provision (34 % vs. 14 %) and at the final 6-month follow up (29 % vs. 5 %), and numerically, but not statistically, more likely to be abstinent from cigarettes at the end of product provision (11 % vs. 5 %) and the final 6-month follow-up (14 % vs. 5 %).
Conclusions: Results suggest that non-tobacco e-cigarette flavors may be more appealing than tobacco flavors, and better promote uptake of e-cigarettes and cigarette smoking reduction. Large-scale randomized trials in which participants are assigned to either tobacco or non-tobacco flavors are critical.