加速细菌鉴定与MALDI-TOF质谱导致更少的诊断测试和成本节约。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Miriam Uzuriaga, Francisco Guillén-Grima, Marta Rua, José Leiva, José R Yuste
{"title":"加速细菌鉴定与MALDI-TOF质谱导致更少的诊断测试和成本节约。","authors":"Miriam Uzuriaga, Francisco Guillén-Grima, Marta Rua, José Leiva, José R Yuste","doi":"10.3390/antibiotics13121163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Rapid microbiology reporting can enhance both clinical and economic outcomes.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This three-year, quasi-experimental study, single-group pretest-posttest study, conducted at a university medical center, aimed to evaluate the clinical and economic impact of rapid microbiological identification reporting using MALDI-TOF MS. A total of 363 consecutive hospitalized patients with bacterial infections were evaluated, comparing a historical control group (CG, n = 183) with an intervention group (IG, <i>n</i> = 180). In the CG, microbiological information (bacterial identification and antibiotic susceptibility) was provided between 18:00 and 22:00 h, while in the IG, bacterial identification was reported between 12:00 and 14:00 h, and antibiotic susceptibility was reported between 18:00 and 22:00 h.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The IG demonstrated a significant reduction in the number of patients undergoing Microbiology (<i>p</i> = 0.01), Biochemistry (<i>p</i> = 0.05), C-Reactive Protein (<i>p</i> = 0.02), Radiological Tests (<i>p</i> = 0.05), Computed Tomography Tests (<i>p</i> = 0.04), and Pathology (<i>p</i> = 0.01). However, no statistically significant reduction was observed in economic costs related to microbiological testing (<i>p</i> = 0.76) or antibiotic consumption (<i>p</i> = 0.59). The timely reporting of microbiological identification to clinicians resulted in fewer patients undergoing additional diagnostic tests, ultimately contributing to reduced healthcare resource utilization without adversely affecting clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":54246,"journal":{"name":"Antibiotics-Basel","volume":"13 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11672624/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accelerated Bacterial Identification with MALDI-TOF MS Leads to Fewer Diagnostic Tests and Cost Savings.\",\"authors\":\"Miriam Uzuriaga, Francisco Guillén-Grima, Marta Rua, José Leiva, José R Yuste\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/antibiotics13121163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Rapid microbiology reporting can enhance both clinical and economic outcomes.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This three-year, quasi-experimental study, single-group pretest-posttest study, conducted at a university medical center, aimed to evaluate the clinical and economic impact of rapid microbiological identification reporting using MALDI-TOF MS. A total of 363 consecutive hospitalized patients with bacterial infections were evaluated, comparing a historical control group (CG, n = 183) with an intervention group (IG, <i>n</i> = 180). In the CG, microbiological information (bacterial identification and antibiotic susceptibility) was provided between 18:00 and 22:00 h, while in the IG, bacterial identification was reported between 12:00 and 14:00 h, and antibiotic susceptibility was reported between 18:00 and 22:00 h.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The IG demonstrated a significant reduction in the number of patients undergoing Microbiology (<i>p</i> = 0.01), Biochemistry (<i>p</i> = 0.05), C-Reactive Protein (<i>p</i> = 0.02), Radiological Tests (<i>p</i> = 0.05), Computed Tomography Tests (<i>p</i> = 0.04), and Pathology (<i>p</i> = 0.01). However, no statistically significant reduction was observed in economic costs related to microbiological testing (<i>p</i> = 0.76) or antibiotic consumption (<i>p</i> = 0.59). The timely reporting of microbiological identification to clinicians resulted in fewer patients undergoing additional diagnostic tests, ultimately contributing to reduced healthcare resource utilization without adversely affecting clinical outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antibiotics-Basel\",\"volume\":\"13 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11672624/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antibiotics-Basel\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13121163\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antibiotics-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13121163","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

快速微生物学报告可以提高临床和经济效果。材料和方法:这项为期三年的准实验研究,单组前测后测研究,在一所大学医学中心进行,旨在评估使用MALDI-TOF ms快速微生物鉴定报告的临床和经济影响。共评估了363例连续住院的细菌感染患者,将历史对照组(CG, n = 183)与干预组(IG, n = 180)进行比较。CG组在18:00 - 22:00 h提供微生物学信息(细菌鉴定和抗生素敏感性),IG组在12:00 - 14:00 h报告细菌鉴定,在18:00 - 22:00 h报告抗生素敏感性。IG显示接受微生物学检查(p = 0.01)、生物化学检查(p = 0.05)、c反应蛋白检查(p = 0.02)、放射学检查(p = 0.05)、计算机断层扫描检查(p = 0.04)和病理学检查(p = 0.01)的患者数量显著减少。然而,与微生物检测相关的经济成本(p = 0.76)或抗生素消耗(p = 0.59)没有统计学上的显著降低。及时向临床医生报告微生物鉴定结果,减少了接受额外诊断测试的患者,最终有助于减少医疗保健资源的利用,而不会对临床结果产生不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accelerated Bacterial Identification with MALDI-TOF MS Leads to Fewer Diagnostic Tests and Cost Savings.

Introduction: Rapid microbiology reporting can enhance both clinical and economic outcomes.

Material and methods: This three-year, quasi-experimental study, single-group pretest-posttest study, conducted at a university medical center, aimed to evaluate the clinical and economic impact of rapid microbiological identification reporting using MALDI-TOF MS. A total of 363 consecutive hospitalized patients with bacterial infections were evaluated, comparing a historical control group (CG, n = 183) with an intervention group (IG, n = 180). In the CG, microbiological information (bacterial identification and antibiotic susceptibility) was provided between 18:00 and 22:00 h, while in the IG, bacterial identification was reported between 12:00 and 14:00 h, and antibiotic susceptibility was reported between 18:00 and 22:00 h.

Results: The IG demonstrated a significant reduction in the number of patients undergoing Microbiology (p = 0.01), Biochemistry (p = 0.05), C-Reactive Protein (p = 0.02), Radiological Tests (p = 0.05), Computed Tomography Tests (p = 0.04), and Pathology (p = 0.01). However, no statistically significant reduction was observed in economic costs related to microbiological testing (p = 0.76) or antibiotic consumption (p = 0.59). The timely reporting of microbiological identification to clinicians resulted in fewer patients undergoing additional diagnostic tests, ultimately contributing to reduced healthcare resource utilization without adversely affecting clinical outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Antibiotics-Basel
Antibiotics-Basel Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
14.60%
发文量
1547
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Antibiotics (ISSN 2079-6382) is an open access, peer reviewed journal on all aspects of antibiotics. Antibiotics is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing the general fields of biochemistry, chemistry, genetics, microbiology and pharmacology. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信