人工智能和机器学习在抗生素药代动力学建模和剂量预测中的应用:范围综述。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Iria Varela-Rey, Enrique Bandín-Vilar, Francisco José Toja-Camba, Antonio Cañizo-Outeiriño, Francisco Cajade-Pascual, Marcos Ortega-Hortas, Víctor Mangas-Sanjuan, Miguel González-Barcia, Irene Zarra-Ferro, Cristina Mondelo-García, Anxo Fernández-Ferreiro
{"title":"人工智能和机器学习在抗生素药代动力学建模和剂量预测中的应用:范围综述。","authors":"Iria Varela-Rey, Enrique Bandín-Vilar, Francisco José Toja-Camba, Antonio Cañizo-Outeiriño, Francisco Cajade-Pascual, Marcos Ortega-Hortas, Víctor Mangas-Sanjuan, Miguel González-Barcia, Irene Zarra-Ferro, Cristina Mondelo-García, Anxo Fernández-Ferreiro","doi":"10.3390/antibiotics13121203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and Objectives:</b> The use of artificial intelligence (AI) and, in particular, machine learning (ML) techniques is growing rapidly in the healthcare field. Their application in pharmacokinetics is of potential interest due to the need to relate enormous amounts of data and to the more efficient development of new predictive dose models. The development of pharmacokinetic models based on these techniques simplifies the process, reduces time, and allows more factors to be considered than with classical methods, and is therefore of special interest in the pharmacokinetic monitoring of antibiotics. This review aims to describe the studies that use AI, mainly oriented to ML techniques, for dose prediction and analyze their results in comparison with the results obtained by classical methods. Furthermore, in the review, the techniques employed and the metrics to evaluate the precision are described to improve the compression of the results. <b>Methods</b>: A systematic search was carried out in the EMBASE, OVID, and PubMed databases and the results obtained were analyzed in detail. <b>Results</b>: Of the 13 articles selected, 10 were published in the last three years. Vancomycin was monitored in seven and none of the studies were performed on new antibiotics. The most used techniques were XGBoost and neural networks. Comparisons were conducted in most cases against population pharmacokinetic models. <b>Conclusions</b>: AI techniques offer promising results. However, the diversity in terms of the statistical metrics used and the low power of some of the articles make the overall assessment difficult. For now, AI-based ML techniques should be used in addition to classical population pharmacokinetic models in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":54246,"journal":{"name":"Antibiotics-Basel","volume":"13 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11672403/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Applications to Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Dose Prediction of Antibiotics: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Iria Varela-Rey, Enrique Bandín-Vilar, Francisco José Toja-Camba, Antonio Cañizo-Outeiriño, Francisco Cajade-Pascual, Marcos Ortega-Hortas, Víctor Mangas-Sanjuan, Miguel González-Barcia, Irene Zarra-Ferro, Cristina Mondelo-García, Anxo Fernández-Ferreiro\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/antibiotics13121203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background and Objectives:</b> The use of artificial intelligence (AI) and, in particular, machine learning (ML) techniques is growing rapidly in the healthcare field. Their application in pharmacokinetics is of potential interest due to the need to relate enormous amounts of data and to the more efficient development of new predictive dose models. The development of pharmacokinetic models based on these techniques simplifies the process, reduces time, and allows more factors to be considered than with classical methods, and is therefore of special interest in the pharmacokinetic monitoring of antibiotics. This review aims to describe the studies that use AI, mainly oriented to ML techniques, for dose prediction and analyze their results in comparison with the results obtained by classical methods. Furthermore, in the review, the techniques employed and the metrics to evaluate the precision are described to improve the compression of the results. <b>Methods</b>: A systematic search was carried out in the EMBASE, OVID, and PubMed databases and the results obtained were analyzed in detail. <b>Results</b>: Of the 13 articles selected, 10 were published in the last three years. Vancomycin was monitored in seven and none of the studies were performed on new antibiotics. The most used techniques were XGBoost and neural networks. Comparisons were conducted in most cases against population pharmacokinetic models. <b>Conclusions</b>: AI techniques offer promising results. However, the diversity in terms of the statistical metrics used and the low power of some of the articles make the overall assessment difficult. For now, AI-based ML techniques should be used in addition to classical population pharmacokinetic models in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antibiotics-Basel\",\"volume\":\"13 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11672403/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antibiotics-Basel\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13121203\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antibiotics-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13121203","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:人工智能(AI),特别是机器学习(ML)技术在医疗保健领域的应用正在迅速增长。它们在药代动力学中的应用是潜在的兴趣,因为需要关联大量的数据和更有效地开发新的预测剂量模型。基于这些技术的药代动力学模型的发展简化了过程,减少了时间,并且比传统方法考虑了更多的因素,因此对抗生素的药代动力学监测特别感兴趣。本文综述了以ML技术为主的人工智能剂量预测研究,并将其结果与经典方法进行对比分析。此外,本文还介绍了用于评估精度的技术和指标,以改善结果的压缩。方法:系统检索EMBASE、OVID和PubMed数据库,并对检索结果进行详细分析。结果:入选的13篇文章中,有10篇发表于近3年。在7个病例中对万古霉素进行了监测,没有一项研究是关于新抗生素的。最常用的技术是XGBoost和神经网络。在大多数情况下,与群体药代动力学模型进行了比较。结论:人工智能技术提供了有希望的结果。然而,所使用的统计度量的多样性和一些文章的低影响力使得总体评估变得困难。目前,在临床实践中,除了经典的群体药代动力学模型外,还应使用基于人工智能的ML技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Applications to Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Dose Prediction of Antibiotics: A Scoping Review.

Background and Objectives: The use of artificial intelligence (AI) and, in particular, machine learning (ML) techniques is growing rapidly in the healthcare field. Their application in pharmacokinetics is of potential interest due to the need to relate enormous amounts of data and to the more efficient development of new predictive dose models. The development of pharmacokinetic models based on these techniques simplifies the process, reduces time, and allows more factors to be considered than with classical methods, and is therefore of special interest in the pharmacokinetic monitoring of antibiotics. This review aims to describe the studies that use AI, mainly oriented to ML techniques, for dose prediction and analyze their results in comparison with the results obtained by classical methods. Furthermore, in the review, the techniques employed and the metrics to evaluate the precision are described to improve the compression of the results. Methods: A systematic search was carried out in the EMBASE, OVID, and PubMed databases and the results obtained were analyzed in detail. Results: Of the 13 articles selected, 10 were published in the last three years. Vancomycin was monitored in seven and none of the studies were performed on new antibiotics. The most used techniques were XGBoost and neural networks. Comparisons were conducted in most cases against population pharmacokinetic models. Conclusions: AI techniques offer promising results. However, the diversity in terms of the statistical metrics used and the low power of some of the articles make the overall assessment difficult. For now, AI-based ML techniques should be used in addition to classical population pharmacokinetic models in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Antibiotics-Basel
Antibiotics-Basel Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
14.60%
发文量
1547
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Antibiotics (ISSN 2079-6382) is an open access, peer reviewed journal on all aspects of antibiotics. Antibiotics is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing the general fields of biochemistry, chemistry, genetics, microbiology and pharmacology. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信