Johanna Lilian Klinge, Petra Warschburger, Annette Maria Klein
{"title":"风险因素、后果还是共同原因?在随机截距交叉滞后面板模型中连接童年中期较低的自我调节和内化症状。","authors":"Johanna Lilian Klinge, Petra Warschburger, Annette Maria Klein","doi":"10.1017/S0954579424001937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigates whether lower self-regulation (SR) facets are risk factors for internalizing symptoms (vulnerability models), consequences of these symptoms (scar models), or develop along the same continuum and thus share common causes (spectrum models) during middle childhood. To analyze these models simultaneously, a random intercept cross-lagged panel model was estimated using Mplus. Data were assessed at three measurement time points in a community-based sample of <i>N</i> = 1657 (52.2% female) children in Germany, aged 6-13. Internalizing symptoms were measured via parent report by the emotional problems scale of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Seven SR facets were assessed behaviorally, via parent report and teacher report. At the within-person level, internalizing symptoms were concurrently associated with emotional reactivity at all measurement time points, while no cross-lagged paths reached significance. At the between-person level, internalizing symptoms were associated with working memory updating (<i>r</i> = -.29, <i>p</i> < .001), inhibitory control (<i>r</i> = -.29, <i>p</i> < .001), planning behavior (<i>r</i> = -.49, <i>p</i> < .001), and emotional reactivity (<i>r</i> = .59, <i>p</i> < .001). As internalizing symptoms and SR facets were primarily associated at the between-person level, the results lend support to spectrum models suggesting common causes of internalizing symptoms and impaired SR.</p>","PeriodicalId":11265,"journal":{"name":"Development and Psychopathology","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk factor, consequence, or common cause? Linking lower self-regulation and internalizing symptoms during middle childhood in a random intercept cross-lagged panel model.\",\"authors\":\"Johanna Lilian Klinge, Petra Warschburger, Annette Maria Klein\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0954579424001937\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study investigates whether lower self-regulation (SR) facets are risk factors for internalizing symptoms (vulnerability models), consequences of these symptoms (scar models), or develop along the same continuum and thus share common causes (spectrum models) during middle childhood. To analyze these models simultaneously, a random intercept cross-lagged panel model was estimated using Mplus. Data were assessed at three measurement time points in a community-based sample of <i>N</i> = 1657 (52.2% female) children in Germany, aged 6-13. Internalizing symptoms were measured via parent report by the emotional problems scale of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Seven SR facets were assessed behaviorally, via parent report and teacher report. At the within-person level, internalizing symptoms were concurrently associated with emotional reactivity at all measurement time points, while no cross-lagged paths reached significance. At the between-person level, internalizing symptoms were associated with working memory updating (<i>r</i> = -.29, <i>p</i> < .001), inhibitory control (<i>r</i> = -.29, <i>p</i> < .001), planning behavior (<i>r</i> = -.49, <i>p</i> < .001), and emotional reactivity (<i>r</i> = .59, <i>p</i> < .001). As internalizing symptoms and SR facets were primarily associated at the between-person level, the results lend support to spectrum models suggesting common causes of internalizing symptoms and impaired SR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11265,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Development and Psychopathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Development and Psychopathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579424001937\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development and Psychopathology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579424001937","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究调查了较低的自我调节(SR)方面是内化症状(脆弱性模型)、这些症状的后果(疤痕模型)的危险因素,还是在童年中期沿着同一连续体发展并因此具有共同的原因(频谱模型)。为了同时分析这些模型,使用Mplus估计随机截距交叉滞后面板模型。在德国以社区为基础的N = 1657(52.2%为女性)6-13岁儿童样本中,对三个测量时间点的数据进行评估。内化症状通过家长报告采用《优势与困难问卷》中的情绪问题量表进行测量。通过家长报告和教师报告对七个方面进行行为评估。在个人水平上,在所有测量时间点,内化症状与情绪反应同时相关,而没有交叉滞后路径达到显著性。在人际水平上,内化症状与工作记忆更新有关(r = -)。29, p < .001),抑制对照(r = -。29, p < .001),计划行为(r = -。49, p < .001)和情绪反应(r = .59, p < .001)。由于内化症状和SR方面主要是在人与人之间的水平上联系在一起的,因此研究结果支持了内化症状和SR受损的共同原因的频谱模型。
Risk factor, consequence, or common cause? Linking lower self-regulation and internalizing symptoms during middle childhood in a random intercept cross-lagged panel model.
This study investigates whether lower self-regulation (SR) facets are risk factors for internalizing symptoms (vulnerability models), consequences of these symptoms (scar models), or develop along the same continuum and thus share common causes (spectrum models) during middle childhood. To analyze these models simultaneously, a random intercept cross-lagged panel model was estimated using Mplus. Data were assessed at three measurement time points in a community-based sample of N = 1657 (52.2% female) children in Germany, aged 6-13. Internalizing symptoms were measured via parent report by the emotional problems scale of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Seven SR facets were assessed behaviorally, via parent report and teacher report. At the within-person level, internalizing symptoms were concurrently associated with emotional reactivity at all measurement time points, while no cross-lagged paths reached significance. At the between-person level, internalizing symptoms were associated with working memory updating (r = -.29, p < .001), inhibitory control (r = -.29, p < .001), planning behavior (r = -.49, p < .001), and emotional reactivity (r = .59, p < .001). As internalizing symptoms and SR facets were primarily associated at the between-person level, the results lend support to spectrum models suggesting common causes of internalizing symptoms and impaired SR.
期刊介绍:
This multidisciplinary journal is devoted to the publication of original, empirical, theoretical and review papers which address the interrelationship of normal and pathological development in adults and children. It is intended to serve and integrate the field of developmental psychopathology which strives to understand patterns of adaptation and maladaptation throughout the lifespan. This journal is of interest to psychologists, psychiatrists, social scientists, neuroscientists, paediatricians, and researchers.