骨科学生情感共情的变化:一项纵向研究。

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Medical Science Educator Pub Date : 2024-08-20 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1007/s40670-024-02139-0
Bruce W Newton, Zachary T Vaskalis
{"title":"骨科学生情感共情的变化:一项纵向研究。","authors":"Bruce W Newton, Zachary T Vaskalis","doi":"10.1007/s40670-024-02139-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Establishing an empathic bond of trust with patients is a characteristic that needs to be taught to medical students. Patients feel physicians are more caring if they sense their physician is empathetic. Yet, longitudinal studies have shown an erosion of affective empathy as allopathic medical students progress through their education. Although there are studies examining cognitive empathy among osteopathic students, there has not been a longitudinal study which has examined potential changes in affective empathy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>During orientation to the Campbell University Jerry M. Wallace School of Osteopathic Medicine (M1 timepoint), and at the beginning of each subsequent academic year (M2-M4 timepoints), and just before graduation (M4F timepoint) the graduating classes of 2017-2019 were asked to voluntarily participate in a longitudinal study by filling out the Balanced Emotional Empathy Scale (BEES), which measures affective empathy. Desired specialty choice and sex was also collected at each of the five timepoints. Specialty choice was divided into Core and Non-Core groups. Core specialties are \"people-oriented\" and have a large amount of patient contact and continuity of care and include Family and Internal Medicine, Ob/Gyn, Pediatrics and Psychiatry. Non-Core specialties are \"technical- or procedure-oriented\" and are those with little or no patient contact and/or continuity of care (e.g., Radiology, Surgery, Emergency Medicine, Anesthesiology).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For men, BEES scores significantly dropped over the five timepoints (<i>p</i> < <i>0.001</i>). While men selecting Non-Core specialties had significant drops in scores (<i>p</i> = <i>0.001</i>); men who selected the Core specialties did not have a significant decrease. For women there was no significant drop in BEES scores, nor for women selecting Core or Non-Core specialties. Women always had larger BEES score averages than the men. Students selecting Core specialties better maintain their affective empathy than those who select Non-Core specialties.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The decline in affective empathy scores for osteopathic students has differences when compared to a similar longitudinal study of allopathic medical students.</p>","PeriodicalId":37113,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Educator","volume":"34 6","pages":"1457-1467"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11699168/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in the Affective Empathy of Osteopathic Students: a Longitudinal Study.\",\"authors\":\"Bruce W Newton, Zachary T Vaskalis\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40670-024-02139-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Establishing an empathic bond of trust with patients is a characteristic that needs to be taught to medical students. Patients feel physicians are more caring if they sense their physician is empathetic. Yet, longitudinal studies have shown an erosion of affective empathy as allopathic medical students progress through their education. Although there are studies examining cognitive empathy among osteopathic students, there has not been a longitudinal study which has examined potential changes in affective empathy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>During orientation to the Campbell University Jerry M. Wallace School of Osteopathic Medicine (M1 timepoint), and at the beginning of each subsequent academic year (M2-M4 timepoints), and just before graduation (M4F timepoint) the graduating classes of 2017-2019 were asked to voluntarily participate in a longitudinal study by filling out the Balanced Emotional Empathy Scale (BEES), which measures affective empathy. Desired specialty choice and sex was also collected at each of the five timepoints. Specialty choice was divided into Core and Non-Core groups. Core specialties are \\\"people-oriented\\\" and have a large amount of patient contact and continuity of care and include Family and Internal Medicine, Ob/Gyn, Pediatrics and Psychiatry. Non-Core specialties are \\\"technical- or procedure-oriented\\\" and are those with little or no patient contact and/or continuity of care (e.g., Radiology, Surgery, Emergency Medicine, Anesthesiology).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For men, BEES scores significantly dropped over the five timepoints (<i>p</i> < <i>0.001</i>). While men selecting Non-Core specialties had significant drops in scores (<i>p</i> = <i>0.001</i>); men who selected the Core specialties did not have a significant decrease. For women there was no significant drop in BEES scores, nor for women selecting Core or Non-Core specialties. Women always had larger BEES score averages than the men. Students selecting Core specialties better maintain their affective empathy than those who select Non-Core specialties.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The decline in affective empathy scores for osteopathic students has differences when compared to a similar longitudinal study of allopathic medical students.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Science Educator\",\"volume\":\"34 6\",\"pages\":\"1457-1467\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11699168/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Science Educator\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-024-02139-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Educator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-024-02139-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:与病人建立信任的共情纽带是一种需要教给医学生的特征。如果病人感觉到医生有同理心,他们会觉得医生更关心病人。然而,纵向研究表明,随着对抗疗法医学院学生在教育过程中的进步,情感同理心会受到侵蚀。虽然有研究考察了整骨疗法学生的认知共情,但还没有一项纵向研究考察了情感共情的潜在变化。方法:在坎贝尔大学杰瑞·m·华莱士骨科医学院(M1时间点)新生入学期间,随后每学年开始(M2-M4时间点),以及毕业前(M4F时间点),要求2017-2019届毕业班自愿参与一项纵向研究,填写衡量情感共情的平衡情绪共情量表(BEES)。在每个时间点收集期望的专业选择和性别。专业选择分为核心组和非核心组。核心专科是“以人为本”,有大量的病人接触和护理的连续性,包括家庭和内科,妇产科,儿科和精神病学。非核心专科是“以技术或程序为导向的”,是那些很少或没有病人接触和/或连续性护理的专科(如放射学、外科、急诊医学、麻醉学)。结果:对于男性,蜜蜂得分在五个时间点上显著下降(p 0.001)。而选择非核心专业的男性得分显著下降(p = 0.001);选择核心专业的男性没有明显下降。对于女性,选择核心或非核心专业的女性,蜜蜂得分没有显著下降。女性的蜜蜂平均得分总是高于男性。选择核心专业的学生比选择非核心专业的学生更能保持情感共情。结论:整骨疗法学生情感共情得分的下降与对抗疗法医学生的类似纵向研究有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Changes in the Affective Empathy of Osteopathic Students: a Longitudinal Study.

Background: Establishing an empathic bond of trust with patients is a characteristic that needs to be taught to medical students. Patients feel physicians are more caring if they sense their physician is empathetic. Yet, longitudinal studies have shown an erosion of affective empathy as allopathic medical students progress through their education. Although there are studies examining cognitive empathy among osteopathic students, there has not been a longitudinal study which has examined potential changes in affective empathy.

Methods: During orientation to the Campbell University Jerry M. Wallace School of Osteopathic Medicine (M1 timepoint), and at the beginning of each subsequent academic year (M2-M4 timepoints), and just before graduation (M4F timepoint) the graduating classes of 2017-2019 were asked to voluntarily participate in a longitudinal study by filling out the Balanced Emotional Empathy Scale (BEES), which measures affective empathy. Desired specialty choice and sex was also collected at each of the five timepoints. Specialty choice was divided into Core and Non-Core groups. Core specialties are "people-oriented" and have a large amount of patient contact and continuity of care and include Family and Internal Medicine, Ob/Gyn, Pediatrics and Psychiatry. Non-Core specialties are "technical- or procedure-oriented" and are those with little or no patient contact and/or continuity of care (e.g., Radiology, Surgery, Emergency Medicine, Anesthesiology).

Results: For men, BEES scores significantly dropped over the five timepoints (p < 0.001). While men selecting Non-Core specialties had significant drops in scores (p = 0.001); men who selected the Core specialties did not have a significant decrease. For women there was no significant drop in BEES scores, nor for women selecting Core or Non-Core specialties. Women always had larger BEES score averages than the men. Students selecting Core specialties better maintain their affective empathy than those who select Non-Core specialties.

Conclusion: The decline in affective empathy scores for osteopathic students has differences when compared to a similar longitudinal study of allopathic medical students.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Science Educator
Medical Science Educator Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
11.80%
发文量
202
期刊介绍: Medical Science Educator is the successor of the journal JIAMSE. It is the peer-reviewed publication of the International Association of Medical Science Educators (IAMSE). The Journal offers all who teach in healthcare the most current information to succeed in their task by publishing scholarly activities, opinions, and resources in medical science education. Published articles focus on teaching the sciences fundamental to modern medicine and health, and include basic science education, clinical teaching, and the use of modern education technologies. The Journal provides the readership a better understanding of teaching and learning techniques in order to advance medical science education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信