{"title":"实验饮料市场:实验研究含糖饮料税和饮料购买工具的可行性和初步验证。","authors":"Haylee Downey, Leonard H Epstein, Jeffrey S Stein","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2024.107848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sugar sweetened-beverage (SSB) consumption contributes to poor diet quality and diet-related chronic diseases. One effective public health strategy to reduce SSB consumption is to tax SSB. Laboratory approaches can complement existing methods to improve understanding of how taxes on SSB influence purchasing. In this study we sought to develop and validate an experimental marketplace that presents participants with beverages typically available at grocery stores. Participants who drink SSB (n = 73) hypothetically shopped for beverages for their household with a 40% SSB tax and with no tax (order counterbalanced). Relative to the no tax condition, SSB purchasing was lower in the tax condition. We also found that self-reported beverage expenditures were correlated with experimental marketplace beverage expenditures. Most participants noticed the tax and agreed that the experimental marketplace was easy to use. Using an experimental marketplace is a promising way to explore SSB tax design to improve public policy. We present ideas for future studies that can include real and hypothetical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":" ","pages":"107848"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Experimental Beverage Marketplace: Feasibility and preliminary validation of a tool to experimentally study sugar-sweetened beverage taxes and beverage purchasing.\",\"authors\":\"Haylee Downey, Leonard H Epstein, Jeffrey S Stein\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.appet.2024.107848\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Sugar sweetened-beverage (SSB) consumption contributes to poor diet quality and diet-related chronic diseases. One effective public health strategy to reduce SSB consumption is to tax SSB. Laboratory approaches can complement existing methods to improve understanding of how taxes on SSB influence purchasing. In this study we sought to develop and validate an experimental marketplace that presents participants with beverages typically available at grocery stores. Participants who drink SSB (n = 73) hypothetically shopped for beverages for their household with a 40% SSB tax and with no tax (order counterbalanced). Relative to the no tax condition, SSB purchasing was lower in the tax condition. We also found that self-reported beverage expenditures were correlated with experimental marketplace beverage expenditures. Most participants noticed the tax and agreed that the experimental marketplace was easy to use. Using an experimental marketplace is a promising way to explore SSB tax design to improve public policy. We present ideas for future studies that can include real and hypothetical outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Appetite\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"107848\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Appetite\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2024.107848\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appetite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2024.107848","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Experimental Beverage Marketplace: Feasibility and preliminary validation of a tool to experimentally study sugar-sweetened beverage taxes and beverage purchasing.
Sugar sweetened-beverage (SSB) consumption contributes to poor diet quality and diet-related chronic diseases. One effective public health strategy to reduce SSB consumption is to tax SSB. Laboratory approaches can complement existing methods to improve understanding of how taxes on SSB influence purchasing. In this study we sought to develop and validate an experimental marketplace that presents participants with beverages typically available at grocery stores. Participants who drink SSB (n = 73) hypothetically shopped for beverages for their household with a 40% SSB tax and with no tax (order counterbalanced). Relative to the no tax condition, SSB purchasing was lower in the tax condition. We also found that self-reported beverage expenditures were correlated with experimental marketplace beverage expenditures. Most participants noticed the tax and agreed that the experimental marketplace was easy to use. Using an experimental marketplace is a promising way to explore SSB tax design to improve public policy. We present ideas for future studies that can include real and hypothetical outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Appetite is an international research journal specializing in cultural, social, psychological, sensory and physiological influences on the selection and intake of foods and drinks. It covers normal and disordered eating and drinking and welcomes studies of both human and non-human animal behaviour toward food. Appetite publishes research reports, reviews and commentaries. Thematic special issues appear regularly. From time to time the journal carries abstracts from professional meetings. Submissions to Appetite are expected to be based primarily on observations directly related to the selection and intake of foods and drinks; papers that are primarily focused on topics such as nutrition or obesity will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution to the understanding of appetite in line with the journal's aims and scope.