澳大利亚农村老年护理机构姑息治疗评估工具包的开发和实施。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
H Khalil, R Hardman, M Livens, P Poon, E Spelten, I Blackberry, S O'Neill
{"title":"澳大利亚农村老年护理机构姑息治疗评估工具包的开发和实施。","authors":"H Khalil, R Hardman, M Livens, P Poon, E Spelten, I Blackberry, S O'Neill","doi":"10.1089/jpm.2024.0368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Palliative care (PC) in rural aged care facilities faces significant challenges, including late referrals and insufficient staff training, leading to a risk of suboptimal end-of-life care. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> The aim of the project was to develop and implement an evidence-based Palliative Care Assessment Toolkit (PCAT) to improve PC in rural aged care facilities and evaluate its impact on care delivery and staff practices. <b><i>Design:</i></b> The study employed a mixed-methods design across three phases: codesign of the toolkit, implementation, and evaluation (using pre- and post-data). Baseline data were collected through an audit of decedents records and interviews with clinical staff. The toolkit was developed based on these findings and included resources in four domains: anticipatory care; advanced care planning, end-of-life care management, and staff training. Post-implementation, the toolkit's impact was assessed through repeat audit of resident records. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The baseline audit revealed issues around advanced care directives, regular reviews, and end-of-life care management. Five to seven months post-implementation of the PCAT toolkit, there were improvements in key areas, the commencement of end-of-life care planning (54% vs. 88%, <i>p</i> = 0.03), availability of medications (55% vs. 100%, <i>p</i> = 0.0016), provision of psychological (59% vs. 82%, <i>p</i> = 0.17), and spiritual support (14% vs. 44%, <i>p</i> = 0.05). Staff feedback indicated increased confidence in delivering PC. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The PCAT improved the delivery of PC in rural aged care settings, enhancing both resident outcomes and staff practices. Further research is recommended to validate these findings across various settings and to explore the long-term sustainability and cost-effectiveness of such interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of palliative medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Implementation of the Palliative Care Assessment Toolkit for Rural Aged Care Facilities in Australia.\",\"authors\":\"H Khalil, R Hardman, M Livens, P Poon, E Spelten, I Blackberry, S O'Neill\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/jpm.2024.0368\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Palliative care (PC) in rural aged care facilities faces significant challenges, including late referrals and insufficient staff training, leading to a risk of suboptimal end-of-life care. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> The aim of the project was to develop and implement an evidence-based Palliative Care Assessment Toolkit (PCAT) to improve PC in rural aged care facilities and evaluate its impact on care delivery and staff practices. <b><i>Design:</i></b> The study employed a mixed-methods design across three phases: codesign of the toolkit, implementation, and evaluation (using pre- and post-data). Baseline data were collected through an audit of decedents records and interviews with clinical staff. The toolkit was developed based on these findings and included resources in four domains: anticipatory care; advanced care planning, end-of-life care management, and staff training. Post-implementation, the toolkit's impact was assessed through repeat audit of resident records. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The baseline audit revealed issues around advanced care directives, regular reviews, and end-of-life care management. Five to seven months post-implementation of the PCAT toolkit, there were improvements in key areas, the commencement of end-of-life care planning (54% vs. 88%, <i>p</i> = 0.03), availability of medications (55% vs. 100%, <i>p</i> = 0.0016), provision of psychological (59% vs. 82%, <i>p</i> = 0.17), and spiritual support (14% vs. 44%, <i>p</i> = 0.05). Staff feedback indicated increased confidence in delivering PC. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The PCAT improved the delivery of PC in rural aged care settings, enhancing both resident outcomes and staff practices. Further research is recommended to validate these findings across various settings and to explore the long-term sustainability and cost-effectiveness of such interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of palliative medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of palliative medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2024.0368\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of palliative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2024.0368","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:农村老年护理机构的姑息治疗(PC)面临重大挑战,包括转诊时间过晚和工作人员培训不足,导致不理想的临终关怀风险。目标:该项目的目的是开发和实施基于证据的姑息治疗评估工具包(PCAT),以改善农村老年护理机构的姑息治疗,并评估其对护理提供和工作人员实践的影响。设计:该研究采用混合方法设计,分为三个阶段:工具包的共同设计、实现和评估(使用前后数据)。基线数据是通过对死者记录的审计和对临床工作人员的访谈收集的。该工具包是根据这些发现开发的,包括四个领域的资源:预见性护理;高级护理计划、临终关怀管理和员工培训。实施后,通过对居民记录的重复审计来评估工具包的影响。结果:基线审计揭示了有关高级护理指示,定期审查和临终关怀管理的问题。实施PCAT工具包5至7个月后,在关键领域有改善,开始临终关怀计划(54%对88%,p = 0.03),药物的可获得性(55%对100%,p = 0.0016),提供心理(59%对82%,p = 0.17)和精神支持(14%对44%,p = 0.05)。员工的反馈表明,他们对提供个人电脑的信心有所增强。结论:PCAT改善了农村老年护理机构PC的提供,提高了居民的结果和工作人员的做法。建议进行进一步的研究,以在各种情况下验证这些发现,并探索此类干预措施的长期可持续性和成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and Implementation of the Palliative Care Assessment Toolkit for Rural Aged Care Facilities in Australia.

Background: Palliative care (PC) in rural aged care facilities faces significant challenges, including late referrals and insufficient staff training, leading to a risk of suboptimal end-of-life care. Objectives: The aim of the project was to develop and implement an evidence-based Palliative Care Assessment Toolkit (PCAT) to improve PC in rural aged care facilities and evaluate its impact on care delivery and staff practices. Design: The study employed a mixed-methods design across three phases: codesign of the toolkit, implementation, and evaluation (using pre- and post-data). Baseline data were collected through an audit of decedents records and interviews with clinical staff. The toolkit was developed based on these findings and included resources in four domains: anticipatory care; advanced care planning, end-of-life care management, and staff training. Post-implementation, the toolkit's impact was assessed through repeat audit of resident records. Results: The baseline audit revealed issues around advanced care directives, regular reviews, and end-of-life care management. Five to seven months post-implementation of the PCAT toolkit, there were improvements in key areas, the commencement of end-of-life care planning (54% vs. 88%, p = 0.03), availability of medications (55% vs. 100%, p = 0.0016), provision of psychological (59% vs. 82%, p = 0.17), and spiritual support (14% vs. 44%, p = 0.05). Staff feedback indicated increased confidence in delivering PC. Conclusions: The PCAT improved the delivery of PC in rural aged care settings, enhancing both resident outcomes and staff practices. Further research is recommended to validate these findings across various settings and to explore the long-term sustainability and cost-effectiveness of such interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of palliative medicine
Journal of palliative medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
345
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Palliative Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed journal covering medical, psychosocial, policy, and legal issues in end-of-life care and relief of suffering for patients with intractable pain. The Journal presents essential information for professionals in hospice/palliative medicine, focusing on improving quality of life for patients and their families, and the latest developments in drug and non-drug treatments. The companion biweekly eNewsletter, Briefings in Palliative Medicine, delivers the latest breaking news and information to keep clinicians and health care providers continuously updated.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信