基于出生体重的脐静脉置管深度配方的比较分析。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Pediatric Investigation Pub Date : 2024-09-06 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1002/ped4.12451
Jingjie Luo, Xu Zheng, Zixin Yang, Keyue Li, Lu Chen, Mingyan Hei
{"title":"基于出生体重的脐静脉置管深度配方的比较分析。","authors":"Jingjie Luo, Xu Zheng, Zixin Yang, Keyue Li, Lu Chen, Mingyan Hei","doi":"10.1002/ped4.12451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Umbilical venous catheterization (UVC) is a common procedure for critically ill newborn infants. The insertion depth was estimated before the procedure using various formulae.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the accuracy of five published formulae based on birth weight (BW).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a secondary retrospective analysis using data collected in a previous study, in which the actual final insertion depth of UVC was recorded. Predicted insertion depths were calculated by five published formulae based on BW. Then the actual depth and predicted depth were compared. Accurate position was defined as predicted depth being within ± 10% of actual depth. The accuracy rate calculated as \"(accurately positioned UVCs/ all UVCs) × 100%\" and the ratio of difference calculated as \"(|predicted depth - actual depth|/ actual depth)\" were compared among five formulae.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Totally 1298 were enrolled, with gestational age 29.8 ± 2.3 weeks and BW 1215 ± 273 g. The accuracy rates were: Tambasco formula (67.2%), Shukla formula (65.0%), JSS formula (64.4%), BW formula (48.9%), and revised Shukla formula (26.9%). Tambasco formula had the highest accuracy rate in newborns with BW ≥ 1000 g. JSS formula had the highest accuracy rate in newborns with BW<1000 g.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>It is suggested to use the Tambasco formula for estimating the UVC insertion depth for newborns, especially for those with BW ≥ 1000 g, and to apply the JSS formula for newborns with BW < 1000 g. There is no universal formula for achieving 100% accurate positioning.</p>","PeriodicalId":19992,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Investigation","volume":"8 4","pages":"265-270"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11664533/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of formulae for umbilical venous catheterization depth based on birth weight.\",\"authors\":\"Jingjie Luo, Xu Zheng, Zixin Yang, Keyue Li, Lu Chen, Mingyan Hei\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ped4.12451\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Umbilical venous catheterization (UVC) is a common procedure for critically ill newborn infants. The insertion depth was estimated before the procedure using various formulae.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the accuracy of five published formulae based on birth weight (BW).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a secondary retrospective analysis using data collected in a previous study, in which the actual final insertion depth of UVC was recorded. Predicted insertion depths were calculated by five published formulae based on BW. Then the actual depth and predicted depth were compared. Accurate position was defined as predicted depth being within ± 10% of actual depth. The accuracy rate calculated as \\\"(accurately positioned UVCs/ all UVCs) × 100%\\\" and the ratio of difference calculated as \\\"(|predicted depth - actual depth|/ actual depth)\\\" were compared among five formulae.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Totally 1298 were enrolled, with gestational age 29.8 ± 2.3 weeks and BW 1215 ± 273 g. The accuracy rates were: Tambasco formula (67.2%), Shukla formula (65.0%), JSS formula (64.4%), BW formula (48.9%), and revised Shukla formula (26.9%). Tambasco formula had the highest accuracy rate in newborns with BW ≥ 1000 g. JSS formula had the highest accuracy rate in newborns with BW<1000 g.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>It is suggested to use the Tambasco formula for estimating the UVC insertion depth for newborns, especially for those with BW ≥ 1000 g, and to apply the JSS formula for newborns with BW < 1000 g. There is no universal formula for achieving 100% accurate positioning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Investigation\",\"volume\":\"8 4\",\"pages\":\"265-270\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11664533/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Investigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ped4.12451\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ped4.12451","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:脐静脉置管(UVC)是危重新生儿的常见手术。在手术前使用各种公式估计插入深度。目的:比较已发表的5种以出生体重(BW)为基础的公式的准确性。方法:这是一项二次回顾性分析,使用先前研究中收集的数据,其中记录了UVC的实际最终插入深度。根据已发表的5个基于BW的公式计算预测插入深度。然后将实际深度与预测深度进行比较。准确位置定义为预测深度在实际深度的±10%以内。比较5个公式的准确率为“(准确定位的uvc /所有uvc) × 100%”,差值比为“(|预测深度-实际深度|/实际深度)”。结果:共纳入1298例,胎龄29.8±2.3周,体重1215±273 g。准确率依次为Tambasco公式(67.2%)、Shukla公式(65.0%)、JSS公式(64.4%)、BW公式(48.9%)、修正Shukla公式(26.9%)。坦巴斯科配方奶粉在新生儿体重≥1000 g时准确率最高。解释:建议使用Tambasco公式估算新生儿,尤其是体重≥1000 g的新生儿UVC插入深度,建议对体重≥1000 g的新生儿采用JSS公式
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative analysis of formulae for umbilical venous catheterization depth based on birth weight.

Importance: Umbilical venous catheterization (UVC) is a common procedure for critically ill newborn infants. The insertion depth was estimated before the procedure using various formulae.

Objective: To compare the accuracy of five published formulae based on birth weight (BW).

Methods: This is a secondary retrospective analysis using data collected in a previous study, in which the actual final insertion depth of UVC was recorded. Predicted insertion depths were calculated by five published formulae based on BW. Then the actual depth and predicted depth were compared. Accurate position was defined as predicted depth being within ± 10% of actual depth. The accuracy rate calculated as "(accurately positioned UVCs/ all UVCs) × 100%" and the ratio of difference calculated as "(|predicted depth - actual depth|/ actual depth)" were compared among five formulae.

Results: Totally 1298 were enrolled, with gestational age 29.8 ± 2.3 weeks and BW 1215 ± 273 g. The accuracy rates were: Tambasco formula (67.2%), Shukla formula (65.0%), JSS formula (64.4%), BW formula (48.9%), and revised Shukla formula (26.9%). Tambasco formula had the highest accuracy rate in newborns with BW ≥ 1000 g. JSS formula had the highest accuracy rate in newborns with BW<1000 g.

Interpretation: It is suggested to use the Tambasco formula for estimating the UVC insertion depth for newborns, especially for those with BW ≥ 1000 g, and to apply the JSS formula for newborns with BW < 1000 g. There is no universal formula for achieving 100% accurate positioning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Investigation
Pediatric Investigation Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
176
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信